Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.15523/JKSESE.2017.10.3.308

Conception of Carbon Cycle in High School Students According to the Difference of Spatial Perception Ability  

Lee, Ji-Eun (Korea National University of Education)
Han, Shin (Korea National University of Education)
Park, Taeyoon (Yonsei University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society of Earth Science Education / v.10, no.3, 2017 , pp. 308-322 More about this Journal
Abstract
It is the purpose of the study to investigate how high school students understand the concept of carbon cycle according to their spatial perception ability. For this, a total of 30 male students and 33 female students, who belong to the science course of the 2nd grade at a general co-education high school located in a megalopolis of Korea and have finished the class of Earth Science I in the first semester, took part in the spatial perception ability test, and four male students and four female students were selected as members of two groups : one group of higher spatial perception ability and the other group of lower spatial perception ability, and they agreed to participate in the study and have got the test of the carbon cycle concept. The results are as followings. It was found that the students who had higher spatial perception ability recorded more scores in the carbon cycle concept, state change concept, and process concept at the factor of word association and the carbon cycle concept, state change and process concept at the factor of drawing than those who had lower spatial perception ability. Connecting link used in the systemic viewpoint was disclosed like this in the factor of causal map of those who had higher spatial perception ability : one student 2 and another one student 1 and the other two students 0 : and in the factor of drawing three students 1 and the other 0 ; But nothing was found in the factors of causal map and drawing of those who had lower spatial perception ability. In addition, it was also found that those students who had higher spatial perception ability, when compared with those students who had lower spatial perception ability, have understood the fact that carbon moves through the interaction of the earth system's lower parts; Three students, who showed higher spatial perception ability, had a low level of systemic thinking concept, and one student who had higher spatial perception ability and four students who had lower spatial perception ability did not have a systemic thinking concept.
Keywords
spatial perception ability; carbon cycle; systemic thinking; concept;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 12  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 강천덕, 이효녕, 윤일희, 김은주 (2008). 물의 순환에 대한 고등학생들의 지구시스템 관련 개념과 시스템 사고의 분석. 경북대학교 과학교육연구지, 32(1), 61-72.
2 김동환 (2000). 김대중 대통령의 인과지도: 1997년도 금융위기의 원인과 극복에 관한 김대중 대통령의 시스템 사고. 한국시스템다이내믹스학회지, 1(1), 5-28.
3 김동환 (2004). 시스템사고, 선학사.
4 김범기, 이항로, 김기정 (1996). 천문 개념 성취도와 공간능력과의 상관관계에 관한 연구. 초등과학교육, 15(2), 315-325.
5 김수정, 김형범, 한신, 정진우 (2012). 초등학생의 공간능력 수준차이에 따른 지구자전에 관한 개념 분석. 대한지구과학교육학회지, 5(1), 20-30.
6 김윤지, 정진우 (2009). 지구계 교육과 소재로서 순환에 대한 이해. 한국과학교육학회지, 29(8), 951-962.
7 문병찬, 정진우, 경재복, 고영구, 윤석태, 김해경, 오강호 (2004). 예비교사들의 탄소 순환에 대한 지구시스템의 관련 개념과 시스템 사고의 적용. 한국지구과학회지, 25(8), 684-696.
8 오영, 이준 (2004). 공간능력. 군자출판사, 서울, 124 p.
9 이경훈, 임종옥 (2010). 공간능력에 따른 중학생의 지하수에 대한 개념. 한국지구과학회지, 31(3), 267-275.   DOI
10 이동은, 한신 (2011). 중학교 2학년 학생들의 순환 개념 이해에 대한 연구. 대한지구과학교육학회지, 4(2), 126-133.
11 이두연, 오은숙, 김형범, 정진우 (2013). 고등학생들의 지구시스템 관점에 기반한 탄소 순환 개념 분석. 경북대학교 과학교육연구지, 37(1), 157-169.
12 이석희, 이용섭 (2012). 스토리텔링 기법을 적용한 '태양계와 별' 수업이 과학학습 동기와 공간지각능력에 미치는 효과. 대한지구과학교육학회지, 5(1), 105-113.
13 이성미, 방정숙 (2007). 초등학생들의 공간감각 이해능력 실태 조사. 수학교육, 46(3), 273-292.
14 이용섭 (2013). 초등과학의 '지구와 우주' 영역에서 초등예비교사의 지식수준과 공간지각 능력과의 관계. 대한지구과학교육학회지, 6(3), 252-260.
15 이용섭, 김순식 (2012). 과학기반 STEAM 천문학습 프로그램이 공간지각능력 및 과학적 태도에 미치는 효과. 대한지구과학교육학회지, 5(3), 297-306.
16 이창진 (2003). 지구과학의 정체성과 학문 분류. 한국지구과학회지, 24(7), 650-656.
17 이호, 조현준, 이효녕 (2007). 달 크레이터 생성에 대한 대학생들의 정신모형 분석. 한국지구과학회지, 28(6), 655-672.   DOI
18 이효녕, 권영륜 (2008). 지구계 주제 중심의 지구과학 모듈 개발 및 적용, 한국지구과학회지, 29(2), 175-188.   DOI
19 이효녕, 권용주, 오희진, 이현동 (2011). 고등학생들의 시스템 사고 향상을 위한 교육프로그램 개발 및 적용 - 지구온난화를 중심으로. 한국지구과학회지, 32(7), 784-797.   DOI
20 이효녕, 조현준, 박미란 (2012). 공간능력의 차이에 따른 10학년 학생들의 판운동 관련 개념에 대한 이해 분석. 한국지구과학회지, 33(4), 360-375.   DOI
21 전만국, 김형범, 정진우 (2013). 초등학생의 공간능력에 따른 태양의 고도에 관한 개념. 대한지구과학교육학회지, 6(1), 28-39.
22 정진우, 김윤지, 정구송 (2007). 물의 순환에 대한 예비 지구과학 교사들의 인식. 한국지구과학회지, 28(6), 699-706.   DOI
23 Ben-zvi-Assaraf, O., & Orion, N. (2005a). A Study of Junior High Students' Perception of the Water Cycle. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53(4), 366-373.   DOI
24 Black, A. A. (2005). Spatial ability and Earth science conceptual understanding. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53(4), 402-414.   DOI
25 Burton, E. P., & Mattietti, G. K. (2011). Cognition and self-efficacy of stratigraphy and geologic time: Implications for improving undergraduate student performance in geological reasoning. Journal of Geoscience Education, 59(3), 163-173.   DOI
26 Maani, K. E. & Maharaj, V. (2004). Links between System Thinking and Complex Decision Making. System Dynamics Review, 20(1), 21-48.   DOI
27 Sweeney, L. B. & Sterman, J. D. (2000). Bathtub Dynamics; Initial Results of a Systems Thinkings Inventory. System Dynamics Review, 16(4), 249-286.   DOI
28 McGee, M. G. (1979). Human spatial abilities: Psychometric studies and environmental, genetic, hormonal and neurological Influences. Psychological Bulletin, 86(5), 889-917.   DOI
29 Pretty, M. R., & Rule, A. C. (2008). Effective materials for increasing young children's spatial and mapping skills. Journal of Geoscience Education, 56(1), 5-14.   DOI
30 Self, C. M., &Golledge, R. G. (1994). Sex-related differences in spatial ability: What every geography educator should know. Journal of Geography, 93(5), 234-243.   DOI
31 Titus, S., & Horsman, E. (2009). Characterizing and improving spatial visualization skills. Journal of Geoscience Education, 57(4), 242-254.   DOI
32 Ben-zvi-Assaraf, O., & Orion, N. (2005b). Development of System Thinking Skills in the Context of Earth System Education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(5), 518-560.   DOI