Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.17702/jai.2020.21.3.101

Improving Charge Injection Characteristics and Electrical Performances of Polymer Field-Effect Transistors by Selective Surface Energy Control of Electrode-Contacted Substrate  

Jang, Jeong Beom (The Research Center for Advanced Specialty Chemicals, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology)
Kim, Taehee (The Research Center for Advanced Specialty Chemicals, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology)
Kim, Hye Jin (The Research Center for Advanced Specialty Chemicals, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology)
Lee, Wonjoo (The Research Center for Advanced Specialty Chemicals, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology)
Seo, Bongkuk (The Research Center for Advanced Specialty Chemicals, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology)
Kim, Yongsung (InCoChem Co., Ltd)
Kim, Changyoon (Fine Chemical And Material Technology Support Department, Ulsan Technopark)
Lim, Choong-Sun (The Research Center for Advanced Specialty Chemicals, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology)
Publication Information
Journal of Adhesion and Interface / v.21, no.3, 2020 , pp. 101-106 More about this Journal
Abstract
In this study, epoxy-modified acrylate was synthesized. The synthesized acrylate was added to the composition for sheet molding compound (SMC) in the range of 5 phr to 15 phr. The prepared SMC prepreg was molded at high temperature and pressure to produce a glass fiber reinforced composite. Physical properties such as tensile and impact strength of the composite were measured, respectively. Experimental data show that the composite with 5 phr of synthesized acrylate has 20% improved tensile strength and 12% improved impact strength than that of the reference sample.
Keywords
glass fiber reinforced composite; Sheet Molding Compound (SMC); acrylate; epoxy resin; compression molding;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 G. S. SPRINGER, J. Reinf. Plast. Compos., 2, 70 (1983).   DOI
2 E.M.S. Sanchez, C.A.C. Zavaglia, M.I. Felisberti, Polymer, 41, 765 (2000).   DOI
3 B.L. Grunden, C.S.P. Sung, Macromolecules, 36, 3166 (2003).   DOI
4 J. H. Yoo, P. S. Shin, J. H. Kim, S. I. Lee, J. M. Park, J. Adhes. Adhes., 21, 65 (2020).
5 D. Cho, S. H. Yun, D. S. Bang, J. Kim, S. Lim, M. Park, J. Adhes. Adhes., 5, 21 (2004).
6 A.C.M.C. Batista, S.R.L. Tino, R.S. Fontes, S.H.S. Nobrega, E.M.F. Aquino, Compos. Part B, 125, 9 (2017).   DOI
7 R.F. Toorkey, K.C. Rajanna, P.K. Sai Prakash, J. Chem. Educ., 73, 373 (1996).
8 Brooks R. Composites in automotive applications, design, 6.16. In: Comprehensive composite materials. Elsevier (2000).
9 Department of Energy US. Quadrennial Technology Review (2011).
10 Environmental Protection Agency, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. 2017 and later model year light-duty vehicle greenhouse gas emissions and corporate average fuel economy standards: Federal Register (2012).
11 Environmental Protection Agency, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. The Safer Affordable Fuel-Efficient (SAFE) Vehicles Rule for Model Years 2021-2026 Passenger Cars and Light Trucks: Federal Register (2018).
12 N.A. Rorrer, J.R. Dorgan, D.R. Vardon, C.R. Martinez, Y.Yang, G.T. Beckham, ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., 4, 6867 (2016).   DOI
13 D. Ray, K. Das, S.N. Ghosh, N.R. Bandyopadhyay, S. Sahoo, A.K. Mohanty, M. Misra, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 49, 6069 (2010).   DOI
14 M. Vallee, G. Tersac, N. D.-Orvoen, and G. Durand, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 43, 6317 (2004).   DOI