Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2022.26.5.317

Analysis of Illustrations for the 2015 Revised Curriculum Practical Textbook 'Software Education'  

Jeaho Lee (Gyeongin National University of Education)
Sang-il Gen (Samri Elementary School)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education / v.26, no.5, 2022 , pp. 317-325 More about this Journal
Abstract
In textbooks, illustrations are used to easily explain concepts and guide the exploration process. Therefore, the illustration should be presented accurately and easily. However, as a result of analyzing previous studies, it was confirmed that there was no research related to illustration analysis at all in the case of the elementary school 'software education' unit. Therefore, among the six practical textbooks developed according to the 2015 revised curriculum, the illustration of the 'software education' unit was analyzed in terms of type, function, and use, and provided guidelines for the adoption of textbooks, curriculum research, and next textbook development. As a result of analyzing six practical textbooks, all textbooks used more than one illustration per page, and the types of illustrations were used in the order of screen capture, picture, picture, table, illustration, illustrative function, and use.
Keywords
2015 Revised Curriculum; Practical Textbook; Software Education; Textbook Analysis; Illustration Analysi;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Y.Y. Kwon, H.B. Yoo, E.Y. Jeong.(2011). An Analysis of Illustrations in Middle School Science Textbooks -Focused on the Unit "Digestion and Circulation"-. Biology Education, 39(4), 517-528.   DOI
2 KICE and et al.(2011). Significance of the compilation of textbooks for elementary and secondary schools according to the notice of revision of curriculum of elementary and secondary schools and the standards for verification.
3 M.S. Seung, H.I Chae, H.J Lim.(2016). Analysis of the Characters' Role Presenting Elementary School Science Textbook: Targeting the 2009 Revised Science 4th-Grade Textbook. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 36(1), 167-175.
4 Pozzer, Roth.(2005). Making sense of photographs. Wiley Periodicals, 89, 219-241.
5 Sipe, L. R. (1998). How picture books work: A semiotically framed theory of text-picture relationships.
6 Children's Literature in Education, 29(2), 97-108.
7 S.H. Park, J.O. Woo.(1994). A Comparative Study on the Illustration of Natural Textbooks in Korean and Japanese Primary Schools. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 14(1), 58-69.
8 E.S. Kim, I.G. Kim.(1996). Middle School Students' Understanding on Figures about Force & Motion Presented in Science Textbook. Bulletin of Science Education, 12(0), 37-63.
9 S.M. Lee.(2007). Research on illustrations related to chemistry in middle school science textbook : their use in classrooms and ways to improve them. Yonsei University.
10 Y.S. Hong.(2002). High school students' understanding of illustrations in high school science textbooks. Chungbuk National University.
11 I.H. Yang, J.E. Lee, S.M. Lim.(2007). Research Articles : How does Elementary Students Understand Illustrations in Science Textbook?. Elementary Ccience Education, 26(5), 475-488.
12 K.Y. Lee.(2007). Comparative Analysis of the Function and Structure of Photographs and Illustrations Used in High School Earth Science Textbooks of the 6th and 7th National Curriculum. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 28(7), 811-824.   DOI
13 Hong Gap Ju. (2019). The connection between illustrations and contents in elementary mathematics textbooks. The Mathematical Education, 58(2), 225-237.   DOI
14 E.K. Lee.(2009). The Effects of Presentation Types on Students' Understanding of Textbook Illustrations. Journal of Geographic and Environmental Education, 17(2), 177-188.
15 Jongeun Kim, Hyo Kwan Dong, Yong-jin Kim. (2018). The Students' Perception on the Real Thing's Actual Size through the Illustrations in Life Science's Textbooks. Biology Education, 46(3), 398-410.   DOI
16 Lee Chang-wook, Jeong Hong-cheol. (2019). AComparative Study on Design in Korean Language Textbook of Elementary School for Creativity Improvement. Journal of Communication Design, 68(0), 24-31.
17 Jang Soo Bin. (2019). Critical Discourse Analysis of Elementary Moral Education Textbooks: Focusing on the Contents Related to National Identity. Theory and Research in Citizenship Education, 51(1), 175-206.   DOI
18 J.H.Lee, S.I.Gen.(2020). Inquisitive Tendency Comparative Analysis on the Software Education Units in the 2015 Revised Practical Arts Textbook. Journal of The Korea Association of Information Education, 24(6). 615-622.   DOI
19 N.E. Lee, J.G. Kim.(2014). An Analysis of Illustrations in the Unit 'The Human in the Nature' of High School Life Science Textbooks. School Science Journal, 8(1), 86-94.
20 H.J. Kim, Y.A. Son, B.M. Min.(2009). Development and Application of Standard for Analyzing Inscriptions Used in Biology1 Textbooks. Biology Education, 37(3), 390-402.   DOI
21 Y.Y. Kwon, H.B. Yoo, E.Y. Jeong.(2011). An Analysis of Illustrations in Middle School Science Textbooks -Focused on the Unit "Digestion and Circulation"-. Biology Education, 39(4), 517-528   DOI