Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2021.25.3.579

Effects of Self-Regulation, Teaching Presence, Learning Engagement on Computational Thinking in Online SW Liberal Education  

Ha, Seukyoung (Ewha Womans University)
Park, Juyeon (Duksung Women's University)
Bae, Yoonju (Ewha Womans University)
Lee, Jeongmin (Ewha Womans University)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education / v.25, no.3, 2021 , pp. 579-590 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study examined the mediating effect of learning engagement in the relationship between self-regulation, teaching presence and computational thinking in online SW education. To verify the research problem, a blended learning model adopted SW liberal course at A Women's University located in Seoul, which 94 students were enrolled in, was selected. The results of this study and the implications are as follows: First, it was found that learning engagement mediated the relationship between self-regulation and computational thinking. Second, it was found that learning engagement mediated the relationship between teaching presence and computational thinking. This study suggested a plan to improve learners' active engagement and self-regulation strategy in online SW education. In addition, it is significant that this study considered a method for learners to perceive teaching presence in online learning environment.
Keywords
Online SW liberal education; Self-regulation; Teaching presence; Learning engagement; Computational thinking;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Curran, P. J., West, S. G., & Finch, J. F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological methods, 1(1), 16.   DOI
2 Artino, A. R. (2008). Motivational beliefs and perceptions of instructional quality: Predicting satisfaction with online training. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(3), 260-270.   DOI
3 Bandura, A. (1986). The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. Journal of social and clinical psychology, 4(3), 359-373.   DOI
4 Bong, M., Kim, S., Reeve, J., Lim, H., Li, W., Jiang, Y., & Pack, S. (2012). SMILES (Student Motivation in the Learning Environment Scales): Measurement of Student Motivation in Learning Environment. korea.ac.kr/korean/research/assessment_scales/list.html
5 Caprara, G. V., Fida, R., Vecchione, M., Del Bove, G., Vecchio, G. M., Barbaranelli, C., & Bandura, A. (2008). Longitudinal analysis of the role of perceived self-efficacy for self-regulated learning in academic continuance and achievement. Journal of educational psychology, 100(3), 525-534.   DOI
6 Cho, J., & Do, H. (2020). Relationships among Teaching Presence, Learning Engagement, and Learners' Satisfaction in K-MOOC. The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 20(15), 551-572.
7 Choi, S. (2016). A Study on Teaching-learning for Enhancing Computational Thinking Skill in terms of Problem Solving. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, 19(1), 53-62.   DOI
8 Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of educational research, 74(1), 59-109.   DOI
9 Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of distance education, 15(1), 7-23.   DOI
10 Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman. New York: NY.
11 Garrison, D. R. (2003). Cognitive presence for effective asynchronous online learning: The role of reflective inquiry, self-direction and metacognition. Elements of quality online education: P ractice and direction, 4(1), 47-58.
12 Handelsman, M. M., Briggs, W. L., Sullivan, N., & Towler, A. (2005). A measure of college student course engagement. The Journal of Educational Research, 98(3), 184-192.   DOI
13 Han, J., & Lee, S. (2019). Investigating Online Learning Types Based on self-regulated learning in Online Software Education: Applying Hierarchical Cluster Analysis. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, 22(5), 51-65.
14 Hayes, A. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling.
15 Junco, R. (2012). In-class multitasking and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(6), 2236-2243.   DOI
16 Heeter, C. (1992). Being there: The subjective experience of presence. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 1(2), 262-271.   DOI
17 Joo, Y., Ha, Y., Yoo, J., & Kim, E. (2010). The Structural Relationship among Teaching Presence, Cognitive Presence, Social Presence, and Learning Outcome in Cyber University. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 14(2), 175-187.
18 Joo, Y., Kim, N., & Cho, H. (2008). Relationship between Self-Efficacy, Online Task Value and Self-Regulated Learning, and Satisfaction and Achievement in Cyber Education. Journal of Korean Association for Educational Information and Media, 14(3), 115-135.
19 Jeong, S., Kim, B., Koo, I., & Park, J. (2010). Effects on Scientific Inquiry, Scientific Attitudes, and Scientific Achievements of Experimental Classes for Kinetics Unit using Self-Regulated Learning Strategy. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 30(6), 681-692.   DOI
20 Burford, V. N., & Gross, D. D. (2000). Caring on-line: On-line empathy, self-disclosure, emotional expression and nurturing. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Communication Association. Seattle, WA.
21 Cheong, Y. (2015). A Study on types of self-regulated learning and change in the type over time. Doctoral dissertation, Graduate School of Kyung Hee University.
22 Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner(Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13-39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
23 Sun, J. C. Y., & Rueda, R. (2012). Situational interest, computer self-efficacy and self-regulation: Their impact on student engagement in distance education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(2), 191-204.   DOI
24 Swan, K., Shea, P., Richardson, J., Ice, P., Garrison, D. R., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2008). Validating a measurement tool of presence in online communities of inquiry. E-mentor, 2(24), 1-12.
25 Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33-35.   DOI
26 Kim, S., Moon, E., & Park, I. (2015). Investigation on the Relationships among Students' Elearning Readiness, Teaching Presence and Learning Effects in an Online Learning Environment. Journal of Korean Association for Educational Information and Media, 21(4), 687-710.   DOI
27 Kim, J., & Kang, M. (2010). Structural Relationship among Teaching Presence, Learning Presence, and Effectiveness of e-Learning in the corporate setting. Asian Journal of Education, 11(2), 29-56.   DOI
28 Kim, M., & Kim, H. (2018). Effectiveness analysis based on computational thinking of a computing course for non-computer majors. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, 21(1), 11-21.   DOI
29 Kim, S., & Lim, K. (2017). The Moderating Effects of Perceived Usefulness and Self-Regulated Learning Skills on the Relationship between Participative Motivation and Learning Satisfaction in Online Continuing Education Programs. Journal of Lifelong Learning Society, 13(3), 85-107.   DOI
30 Kang, M., & Lim, K. (2013). Structural Analyses on the Effects of Self-regulated Learning and Learning Motivation on Learner-instructor Interactions and Academic Performance in College Learning Environments with e-Learning Contents. Journal of The Korea Contents Society, 13(11), 1014-1023.   DOI
31 Lee, J., Yoo, J., & Lee, M. (2018). Predictability of Elementary Students' Self-Regulated Learning, GRIT and Parents Support on Computational Thinking and Learning Satisfaction in Online Software Education. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 22(6), 689-699.   DOI
32 Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational psychology review, 16(4), 385-407.   DOI
33 Lee, S., & Ann, S. (2020). Analysis of student perception of learning block-type educational programming tools in online learning environment. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Educaton, 24(6), 519-528.   DOI
34 Korkmaz, O., Cakir, R., & Ozden, M. Y. (2015). Computational thinking levels scale (ctls) adaptation for secondary school level. Gazi. Journal of Education Sciences, 1(2), 143-162.
35 Lee, J., & Yoon, S. (2011). The Effects of Task Value, Perceived Usefulness, and Teaching Presence on Learning Outcomes in Cyber University. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 15(3), 449-458.
36 Kim, S. (2019). Teaching presence strengthening strategy based on correlation analysis between perception of teaching presence and learning satisfaction in online Spanish education. Latin American and Caribbean Studies, 38(3), 69-98.   DOI
37 Lim, Y., & Lee, O. (2008). A Study on Relations Among the Learning Participation, Learning Satisfaction and Academic Achievement of Cyber Learners. The Journal of Yeolin Education, 16(2), 177-200.
38 Ministry of Education, Korea (2015). Software Education Instructional Guidance.
39 Mosholder, R. S. (2007). Evaluating engagement with, and determining the direct effects of, a curriculum teaching students learning and motivation strategies. Doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University.
40 Oh, M., & Kim, M. (2018). Analysis of Effects of Scratch Programing Education to Improve Computational Thinking. Journal of Korean Association for Educational Information and Media, 24(2), 255-275.   DOI
41 Robinson, P. E., & Caroll, J. (2017). An online learning platform for teaching, learning, and assessment of programming. 2017 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 547-556.
42 Marks, H. M. (2000). Student engagement in instructional activity: Patterns in the elementary, middle, and high school years. American educational research journal, 37(1), 153-184.   DOI
43 Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of educational psychology, 85(4), 571-581.   DOI
44 Spanjers, D. M. (2007). Cognitive engagement as a predictor of achievement. University of Minnesota.
45 Surya, E., Syahputra, E., & Jumiati, N. (2018). Effect of Problem Based Learning Toward Mathematical Communication Ability and Self-Regulated Learning. Journal of Education and P ractice, 9(6), 14-23.
46 Newmann, F. M. (Ed.). (1992). Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools. New York: Teacher College Press Columbia University.