Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2015.19.3.323

Effects of Teaching and Learning Strategies of Learner-Centered Learning for Improving Computational Thinking  

Kim, Soohwan (Chongshin University)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education / v.19, no.3, 2015 , pp. 323-332 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to verify the effectiveness of teaching and learning strategies of learner-centered learning for the computational thinking that is the educational purpose of SW education. For improving computational thinking, funny and easy educational contents and appropriate teaching and learning strategies are needed. In this study, I applied and verified the learner-centered strategies for non-computer major learners in computational thinking education: collaboration, sharing, self-directed learning. As the result, the teaching and learning of learner-centered learning affects the pleasure and the interest of learners; they affect computational thinking efficacy; it affects intention to use. It is able to apply this learner-centered learning strategies to computational thinking education as an effective educational strategies.
Keywords
SW Education; Computational Thinking; Learner-Centered Learning; Teaching and Learning Strategy; Non-Computer Major Student;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 4  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Brennan, K., Balch, C., Chung, M. (2015). Creative Computing Guide Book (traslated by Han, S. G., Kim, S. H. et al.). Seoul: Purple (Original Book Published in 2014).
2 Kim, S. H. & Han, S. K. (2012). Design-Based Learning for Computational Thinking. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 16(3), 319-326.
3 Kim, Y. A. et al. (2015). A Study of Development of the Operation Guideline for SW Education. KERIS, CR 2015-3.
4 Kim, Y. C. (2001). Qualitative Research in Subject Curriculum and Lesson. Moonumsa.
5 Lee, E. K. (2009). Robot Programming Teaching and Learning Model to Enhance Computational Thinking Ability. Ph. D. thesis, Graduate School of Korea National University of Education.
6 Nacce & CAS (2014). Computing in the national curriculum: a guide for secondary teachers. Retrieved 2015. 7. 14 http://www.computing atschool.org.uk/data/uploads/cas_secondary.pdf
7 National Research Council (2011). Report of a Workshop of Pedagogical Aspects of Computational Thinking. Washington, D. C., The National Academies Press.
8 Noddings, N. (1990). Constructivism in Mathematics Education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, Monograph, 4, 7-18.   DOI
9 Papert, S. (1980). MINDSTORMS: Children, Computers, and Powerful Idea. Newyork, NY: basic Books, Ins.
10 Papert, S. & Resnick, M. (1995). Technological Fluency and the Representation of Knowledge. Proposal to the National Science Foundation. MIT Media Laboratory.
11 Park, J. H. (2015). Effects of Storytelling Based Software Education on Computational Thinking, Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 19(1), 57-68.   DOI
12 So, Y. H. (2006). A Study on Factors Affecting Effective Instruction in the Classroom. The Korean Journal of Educational Methodology Studies, 18(1), 1-22.
13 Brennan, K., & Resnick, M. (2012). New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. Paper presented at annual American Educational Research Association meeting, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
14 Choi, H. S. (2014). Developing Lessons and Rubrics to Promote Computational Thinking. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 18(1), 57-64.   DOI
15 CSTA & ISTE (2011). Operational definition of com putational thinking for K-12 Education. Retrieved 2015. 7. 14 http://csta.acm.org/Curriculum/sub/CurrFiles/CompThinkingFlyer.pdf
16 Gong, M., Xu, Y., & Yu, Y. (2004). An enhanced technology acceptance model for web-based learning. Journal of Information Systems Education, 15(4), 365-373.
17 Jenkins, T. (2002). On The Difficulty of Learning to Program. 3rd Annual LTSN-ICS Conference, Loughborough University. 53-58.
18 KACE & NIPA (2014). Report of Management State and Requirements of Domestic and Foreign SW Education.
19 Kang, I., Choi, J. & Chang, K. (2006). Retrospecting and Prospecting Studies of Constructivism: The comparison of Korean and Western Countries. Journal of Educational Technology, 22(4), 105-135.   DOI
20 Kim, K. H. et al. (2015). The Study of Development of The Revised Tentative Plan for Information Curriculum. KICE, CRC 2015-17.
21 Kim, M. S., Park, J., Kim, Y. J. & Oh, H. S. (2002). A Study For Developing Critical Thinking Test (II): Construction of the Test. KICE, RRE 2002-3.
22 Kim, S. H. (2014). Analysis of Non-Computer Majors' Difficulties in Computational Thinking Education. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, 18(3), 49-57.
23 Sung, J. S., Kim, S. H. & Kim, H. (2015). Analysis of Art and Humanity Major Learners' Features in Programming Class. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, 18(3), 25-35.
24 Wing, J. M. (2008). Computational thinking and thinking about computing. Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society, 366, 3717-3725.   DOI
25 Yoon, J. E., Kim, D. & Kwon, O. N. (2015). Teachers' roles of learner-centered classes in domestic mathematics education research. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 15(1), 45-68.