Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2015.19.3.311

Design Trend and Improvement Strategies of Contents Developed by Teachers -Focus on Prizewinner of the Research Competition on Educational Informatization-  

Jo, Miheon (Dept. of Computer Education, Cheongju National University of Education)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education / v.19, no.3, 2015 , pp. 311-322 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study analyzed the trend and problems in the design of contents developed by teachers, and suggested strategies for improvement. It analyzed the contents ranked as the first level in the Research Competition on Educational Informatization for the last 3 years. Concerning the 8 types of instructional activities and the 6 types of knowledge acquisition, most contents took limited types(i.e., the individual tutoring type, the concept learning type and the principle learning type). In addition, when the contents were evaluated according to the quality certification criteria for educational software, it was found that the quality level of the design was low in many criteria. When the content analysis was applied for the in-depth analysis of design characteristics, various problems were found in the areas such as evaluation, feedback and learning objectives. Also other common problems were found in the design areas such as level-based differentiated learning, interaction between students and contents, presentation of text and narration, utilization of information on a student, screen design, the content level appropriate for students. In relation to the problems found from the analysis, some strategies for improvement were suggested concerning the following topics: question selection and guidance for evaluation, content and types of feedback, statement of learning objectives, selection of content, interaction, and screen design.
Keywords
Instructional Design; Educational Contents; Development by Teachers; Design Trend; Research Competition on Educational Informatization;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Ban, M. S., Jang, S. H., & Kim, I. S. (2003). Improvement Strategies for the Service Management and Policy of Educational Contents Quality Certification. Korea Education and Research Information Service.
2 Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flipped Your Classroom: Reach Every Student in Every Class Every Day. International Society for Technology in Education.
3 Byeon, S. Y., Lee, S. K., & Gwon, S. Y. (2006). Analysis of the Current Status of e-Learning in Companies. Korea Research Institute for Vocational Education and Training.
4 Chang, H. (2010). A Comparative Analysis of Design Methods for Educational Games. Journal of Korea Game Society, 10(6), 25-35.
5 Clark, R C., & Mayer, R. E. (2011). e-Learning and the Science of Instruction. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
6 Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2011). The Systematic Design of Instruction. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
7 Digital Times (2015, 4, 12). The Korean Intellectual Property Office Plans to Find Excellent e-Learning Contents.
8 Han, T. M., Ban, M. S., Kim, I. S., & Jang, S. H. (2003). The Development of a Quality Assurance System for Educational Contents. Korea Education and Research Information Service.
9 Heo, H. O., Lim, K. Y., Seo, J. H., & Kim, Y. A. (2011). Modeling of 21st Century Learner and Teacher Competencies. Korea Education and Research Information Service.
10 Horton, W. (2012). E-Learning by Design. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
11 Jin, S., & Rha, I. (2009). A framework of teaching competencies and comparison of the perception: between Pre-service and In-service elementary school teachers in Korea. The Journal of Elementary Education, 22(1), 343-368.
12 Jo, M. H., Kim, M. K., Kim. M. R., Lee, O. H, & Heo, H. O. (2015). Design of e-Learning Contents. KyoungGi: KyoYookBook.
13 Joo, Y. J., & Lee, J. H. (2005). A study on the criteria for quality assurance in cyber universities. Journal of Educational Technology, 21(1), 95-130.   DOI
14 Kang, M. H., Kang, I. A., Song, S. H., Lim, C. I., Cho, I. H., Choi, S. J., & Heo, H. O. (2007). The Design of e-Learning Contents for the Future. KyeongGi: Seohyunsa.
15 Kim, D. S., Jeong, O. Y., & Kang, S. P. (2002). Exploration of Instructional Design Theories. Seoul: Wonmisa.
16 Kim, H. B., Park, I., & Lim, B. R. (2005). A Study on Utilizing Strategies for the Cooperating Development & Use e-Learning Contents among Universities. Korea Education and Research Information Service.
17 Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M., Kalman, H., & Kemp, J. E. (2011). Designing Effective Instruction. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
18 Ministry of Education and Science Technology (2011). Driving Strategies for Smart Education.
19 Ministry of Education, & Korea Education and Research Information Service (2013). 2013 White Paper on ICT in Education Korea.
20 Ministry of Education, & Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation (2015). Analysis Guideline of Assessment Results for Understanding Students' Achievement.
21 Park, K. (2007). Instructional design model and practice: a survey of design practice. Journal of Educational Technology, 23(4), 1-30.
22 Reigeluth, C. M., & Carr-chellman, A. A. (2009). Instructional Design Theories and Models(Volume III), Florence, Kentucky: Routledge, 2009.
23 Reiser, R. V., & Dempsey, J. V. (2011). Trends and Issues in Instructional Design and Technology, Boston, MA: Pearson Education Inc.
24 Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78, 153-189.   DOI
25 Smaldino, W. E., Lowther, D. L., & Russell, J. D. (2007). Instructional Media and Technologies for Learning(9th ed.), Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
26 Song, S. H. (2008). Preliminary Study for the Design of Digital Edutainment Content. The Journal of Educational Information and Media, 14(2), 159-188.
27 Kim, Y. S., Kim, H. J., Han, S. Y. (2007). Learning Theory and Design of e-Learning Environment. KyoungGi: KyoYookBook.
28 Kim, H. J., Heo, H. O., Kim, E. Y., & Ban, M. S. (2012). Research on the Development of a Teacher Training Program for Smart Education. Korea Education and Research Information Service.
29 Kim, I., & You, Y. (2006). Development of quality assurance support system for e-Learning contents. The Journal of Educational Information and Media, 12(1), 107-130.
30 Kim, S. W. (2015). Understanding of Educational Evaluation. Seoul: Hakjisa.
31 Korea Education and Research Information Service, & National e-Learning Quality Assurance Center (2014). Guideline for e-Learning Contents Quality Certification.
32 Lee, J. J. (2013). The Definition and Value of Contents. CEO&. 9. Retrieved on 10 August from http://blog.naver.com/PostView.nhn?blogId=sh2030100&logNo=80198120388.
33 Leem, J. (2009). Current status and future tasks of e-Learning contents design in corporate education. Journal of Lifelong Learning Society, 5(1), 45-72.
34 Lim, B., & Lee, J. (2007). Current status of e-Learning contents in higher education. The Journal of Educational Information and Media, 13(2), 277-307.
35 Lim, C. (2012). Models and Theories of Instructional Design. KyoungGi: KyoYookBook.
36 Lim, H., Yoo, Y., & Chung, J. (2014). The comparison analysis of domestic research trends of educational technology in last decade. The Journal of Educational Information and Media, 20(2), 137-159.
37 Ministry of Education (2014). Driving Strategies for the 8th Research Competition on Educational Informatization.