Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7743/kisee.2019.18.4.044

A Direction and Challenge of School Safety Policy : Focusing on 'Vision Zero'  

Park, Youn-Ju (한국교원대학교 교육정책전문대학원)
Publication Information
The Journal of Sustainable Design and Educational Environment Research / v.18, no.4, 2019 , pp. 44-57 More about this Journal
Abstract
'Vision Zero' is a fundamental response to rapidly increasing number of traffic accidents. It was first introduced in Sweden in the late 20th century and is spreading worldwide. 'Vision Zero' criticizes an existing traffic safety policy that presupposes a reasonable human beings. It suggests that traffic safety policies should be on the possibility of making mistakes by irrational beings. Under the ethical vision that human life and health cannot be exchanged for any other social benefits, the policy issue should allow to make zero out the death rate and serious injuries of traffic accidents while allowing minor injuries. 'Vision Zero' argues that the government should design an environment in which individual mistakes never lead to fatal accidents. 'Vision Zero', which shows a different perspective from existing policies regarding safety ultimate goal, is spreading from traffic safety to other areas such as health, safety and well-being. This study examines the implication of the Korea's school safety policy from the perspectives of 'Vision Zero' on the five areas : "for what", "from what", "by what", "by whom", and "how". The study is intended to establish a new directions and challenges of school safety policy in Korea through an analytical discussions on 'Vision Zero'.
Keywords
school safety; school safety policy; vision zero; safety ethics; safe system;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 김경회, & 김숙이. (2017). 학교안전 연구 경향 분석과 발전과제. 교육행정학연구, 32, 161-184.
2 김은철, & 송성수. (2012). 과학기술시대의 책임윤리를 찾아서: 한스요나스의 '책임의 원칙'을 중심으로. Journal of Engineering Education Research, 15(1), 72-78.   DOI
3 박수혁. (2009). Paternalismus und Recht in Korea. 서울법학, 16(2), 1-11.
4 볼프강 조프스키. (2007) 안전의 원칙 - 위험사회, 자유냐 안전이냐, 푸른숲.
5 손경미. (2013). 바우만의 액체근대론과 벡의 성찰적 근대화론 비교 연구: 개인화, 위험사회를 중심으로. 사회와이론, 139-174.
6 오대영, 신선희, 박윤주, 김경회, 한종극. (2019). 요구분석을 통한 학교안전정책 개선방안 연구. 교육녹색환경연구, 18(2), 22-34.   DOI
7 이택광 (2017). 자유의 '이중구속'과 액체 '근대'. 오늘의 문예비평, 180-194.
8 캐스 R. 서스타인. (2016). 와이 넛지? 똑똑한 정부는 어떻게 행복한 사회를 만드는가 (박세연 역). 열린책들.
9 向殿政男. (2018). 安全學の視点から見た小中高等學校における安全敎育. 日本信頼性學會誌 信賴性, 40(1), 2-7.
10 Bosworth, R., Hunter, A., Kibria, A., & STRATA. (2017). The Value of a Statistical Life: Economics and Politics. STRATA: Logan, UT, USA.
11 Boyer, W. H. (2006). Myth America: Democracy vs. capitalism. New York: Apex Press. 133 - 165.
12 Daube, M., Stafford, J., & Bond, L. (2008). No need for nanny. Tobacco control, 17(6), 426-427.   DOI
13 Elvik, R. (1999). Can injury prevention efforts go too far? Reflections on some possible implications of Vision Zero for road accident fatalities. Accid. Anal. Prev. 31 (3), 265-286.   DOI
14 Gostin, L. O., & Gostin, K. G. (2009). A broader liberty: JS Mill, paternalism and the public's health. Public health, 123(3), 214-221.   DOI
15 ITF. (2016), Zero Road Deaths and Serious Injuries: Leading a Paradigm Shift to a Safe System, OECD Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789282108055-en
16 Leah Shaum. (2017). Safe Streets: Insights on Vision Zero Policies from European Cities, Urban and Regional Policy, No.27.
17 John Whitelegg and Gary Haq(2006). World transport: policy & practice. Geographical Journal 172(1):78-79 . March
18 Kim, E., Muennig, P., & Rosen, Z. (2017). Vision zero: a toolkit for road safety in the modern era. Injury epidemiology, 4(1).
19 Kristianssen, A. C., Andersson, R., Belin, M. A., & Nilsen, P. (2018). Swedish Vision Zero policies for safety-A comparative policy content analysis. Safety science, 103, 260-269.   DOI
20 Lindberg, J., Strandroth, J., Ekman, L., Persson, S., & Malmstrom, T. (2016). Oversyn av etappmal for sakerhet pa vag till 2020 och 2030, med en utblick mot 2050.
21 OECD, I. (2014). Road Safety Annual Report. In International Transport Forum (Vol. 300).
22 Commission for Global Road Safety. (2006). Make Roads Safe: A New Priority for Sustainable Development. The Commission.
23 Shahum, L., & Vanderkooy, Z. (2017). Moving from Vision to Action: Fundamental Principles, Policies & Practices to Advance Vision Zero in the US.
24 Tingvall, C., & Haworth, N. (1999). Vision Zero-An ethical approach to safety and mobility.
25 Tom Platt, Jeremy Leach(2017). Delivering Vision Zero in London Proposals from 20's Plenty for Us, Living Streets and London Living Streets
26 Wegman, F. C. M., & Schermers, A. (2005). Sustainable safety in The Netherlands: the vision, the implementation and the safety effects. Contribution to the 3rd International Symposium on Highway Geometric Design, 26 June-2 July 2005, Chicago, Illinois.
27 Vision Zero: Designing Streets to Save Lives [Website]. (2019, Nov 15). https://www.good.is/articles/vision-zero-streetdesign
28 Strategie nationale VISION ZERO [Website]. (2019, Nov 20). https://visionzero.lu/en/strategy/
29 Transport Research Centre, & International Transport Forum. (2008). Towards zero: Ambitious road safety targets and the safe system approach. Organization for Economic.
30 Vision Zero: Learning from Sweden's Successes, [Website]. (2019, Nov 29). https://centerforactivedesign.org/visionzero
31 Why Vision Zero? [Website]. (2019, Nov 11). http://visionzero.global/wh