Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5000/EESK.2003.7.1.017

Seismic Response Control of a Cable-Stayed Bridge Using Passive, Active, Semiactive and Hybrid Systems  

Spencer, B. F. (Dept. of Civil and Envir. University of Illinosis at Urbana-Campaign)
Publication Information
Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea / v.7, no.1, 2003 , pp. 17-29 More about this Journal
Abstract
This paper preliminarily investigates the effectiveness of various control systems, such as passive, active, semiactive and hybrid control, for seismic protection of cable-stayed bridges by examining the ASCE first generation benchmark problem for a cable-stayed bridge. This benchm.0.00000ark problem considers the cable-stayed bridge that is scheduled for completion in Missouri, USA In 2003. Seismic considerations were strongly considered in the design of this bridge due to location of the bridge and its critical role as a principal crossing of the Mississippi River. Based on detailed drawings of this cable-stayed bridge, a three-dimensional linearized evaluation model has been developed to represent the complex behavior of the bridge. A set of eighteen evaluation criteria has been developed to evaluate the capability of each control system. In this study, four passive control systems, one active control system, two semiactive control systems and three hybrid control systems are considered. Numerical simulation results show that all the control systems are effective in reducing the responses of the benchmark cable-stayed bridge under the historical earthquakes. To get good performance, however, the passive control systems need quite large control forces compared to other control systems. The simulation results also demonstrate that the passive, semiactive and hybrid control systems are robust to the stiffness uncertainty of the structure. Therefore, the semiactive and hybrid control systems are more appropriate in real applications for full-scale civil infrastructures.
Keywords
performance evaluation; passive control system; active control system; semiactive control system; hybrid system; benchmark cable-stayed bridge; seismic response control;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Ali, H. M. and Abdel-Ghaffar, A. M, "Seismic passive control of cable-stayed bridges," Shock and Vibration, Vol. 2, No. 4, 1995, pp. 259-272.   DOI
2 Skinner, R. I., Robinson, W. H., and Mcverry, G. H., An Introduction to Seismic Isolation, New York, Wiley, 1993.
3 MATLAB$^{{\circledR}}$, The Math Works, Inc., Natick, Massachusetts, 1997.
4 Park, K. S., Jung, H. J., and Lee, I. W, "Hybrid control strategies for seismic protection of benchmark cablestayed bridges," Proceedings of the 7th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering(CD-ROM), Boston, USA, 2002.
5 Schemmann, A. G. and Smith, H. A, "Vibration control of cable-stayed bridge-Part 2: control atlalyses," Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 27, 1998, pp. 825-843.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Park, K. S., Jung, H. J., and Lee, I. W, "Hybrid control strategy for seismic protection of a benchmark cablestayed bridge," Engineering Structures, 2002, accepted for publication.
7 ABAQUS$^{{\circledR}}$; Hibbitt, Karlsson & Sorensen Inc., Pawtucket, RI, 1996.
8 He, W. L., Agrawal, A. K, and Mahmoud, K., "Control of seismically excited cable-stayed bridge using resetting semiactive stiffness dampers," Journal of Bridge Engineering, ASCE, Vol' 6, No. 6, 2001, pp. 376-384.   DOI
9 Dyke, S. J., Turan, G, Caicedo, J. M., Bergman, L. A, and Hague, S., "Benchmark control problem for seismic response of cable-stayed bridges," 2000, http://wussel.cive.wustl.edu/quake/
10 Moon, S. J., Bergman, L. A, and Voulgaris, P. G., "Sliding mode control of a cable-stayed bridge subjected to seismic excitation," Proceedings of the 7th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering(CD-ROM), Boston, USA, 2001.   과학기술학회마을
11 Ni, Y. Q., Spencer, Jr. B. E, and Ko, J. M, "Feasibility of active control of cable-stayed bridge: An insight into Ting Kau Bridge," Smart Structures and Materials 2001: Smart Systems for Bridges, Structures, and Highways, Proceedings of SPIE, 2001.
12 Paulet-Crainiceanu, F, "Seismic response control of cable-stayed bridges," Proceedings of the Second World Conference on Structural Control, Vol. 2, 1998, pp. 959-964.
13 Public Works Research Institute(PWRl), "Seismic design procedure of cable-stayed bridge: Part I, dynamic characteristics of cable-stayed bridges based on field vibration test results," Technical Report, Tsukuba, Japan, 1986.
14 Miyata, T., Yamada, H, and Paulet-Grainiceanu, E, "Active structural control for cable bridges under earthquake loads," Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Motion and Vibration Control, Vol. 2, 1996, pp. 53-58.
15 Takahashi, "Earthquake resistance design of the Meiko Nishi Bridge," Proceedings of the First U.S-Japan Bridge Engineering Workshop, Tsukuba, Japan, 1984.
16 Turan, G, "Active Control of a Cable-Stayed Bridge Against Earthquake Excitations," Ph.D. Dissertation, Deparbnent of Civil Engineering, University of lllinois at Urbana-Olampaign, 2001.
17 Moon, S. J., Bergman, L. A, and Voulgaris, P. G., "Application of magnetorheological dampers to control of a cable-stayed bridge subjected to seismic excitation," Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 2001, submitted.
18 Nishitani, A. and Inoue, Y., "Overview of the application of active/semiactive control to building structures in Japan," Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 30, 2001, pp. 1565-1574.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Jung, H. J. Spencer, Jr. B. F., and Lee, I. W., "Benchmark control problem for seismically excited cable-stayed bridges using smart damping strategies," IABSE Conference, Seoul, Korea, 2001.
20 Sakai, T., Nishikawa, K, and Kawashima, K, "New design considerations for reducing seismic lateral force of highway bridges in Japan," Proceedings of the Eleventh IRF World Meeting, Seoul, Korea, 1989, pp. 1-4.
21 lemma, H, Adachi, Y., and Pradono, M H, "Seismic retrofit of a cable-stayed bridge with dynamic response control devices," Proceedings of the 14th KKNN Symposium on Civil Engineering, 2001, pp. 95-100.
22 Dyke, S. J. and Spencer, Jr. B. F., "A comparison of semi-active control strategies for the MR damper," Proceedings of the lASTED International Conference on Intelligent Information Systems, Bahamas, 1997.   DOI
23 Dyke, S. J., Spencer, Jr. B. F., Sain, M. K, and Carlson, J. D., "Modeling and control of magnetorheological dampers for seismic response," Smart Materials and Structures, Vol. 5, 1996, pp. 565-575.   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Kitazawa, M, Noguchi, J., Nishimori, K, and Izeki, J., "Earthquake resistant design of a long period structure and development of girder displacement stopper: Higashi Kobe Bridge," Proceedings of the Initial Symposium on Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan, 1991, pp. 123-141.
25 Agrawal, A. K, Yang, J. N., and He, W L., "Performance evaluation of some semiactive control system for a benchmark cable-stayed bridge," Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 2002, submitted.   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Schemmann, A. G. and Smith, H. A., "Vibration control of cable-stayed bridge-Part 1: modeling issues" Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics,Vol. 27, 1998, pp. 811-824.   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Jung, H. J., Spencer, Jr. B. E, and Lee, I. W., "Seismic protection of cable-stayed bridges using smart damping strategy," Journal of Bridge Engineering, ASCE, 2001, submitted.