Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.21796/jse.2021.45.2.257

Analysis of the Results between On-Line and Face-to-Face Classes in 'Calculus' & 'Mathematical Education Theory'  

Suh, Boeuk (Chungnam National University)
Publication Information
Journal of Science Education / v.45, no.2, 2021 , pp. 257-273 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study explores classes for pre-service mathematics teachers. The purpose of this study is to examine the differences between 'non-face-to-face' classes & 'face-to-face' classes, as well as the differences in learning outcomes between these two methods. A Professors' Learning Group was formed to effectively carry out this study. Through this learning group, we shared how to plan and operate the lecture. The subjects of this study are 'non-face-to-face calculus courses & face-to-face calculus courses' and 'non-face mathematics education theory courses & face-to-face mathematics education theory courses." Specifically, in these two pairs of courses, we analyze the differences in course management and the differences in the outcomes of students' assessments. Non-face-to-face classes were planned, developed, implemented and evaluated based on the 'non-face class design model.' The results of this study are as follows: First, we explored the differences between 'non-face-to-face classes/mixed classes' and 'face-to-face classes.' Second, the achievement results in calculus courses were higher in face-to-face classes than in non-face classes. Third, the results of achievements in mathematics education theory courses were higher in mixed classes than in face-to-face classes. Through the results of this study, we hope that the non-face-to-face class capabilities can be improved in pre-service mathematics teacher training.
Keywords
pre-service mathematics teacher; non-face-to-face class; on-line class; blended class; mathematical education theory; calculus; comparison between non-face-to-face class and face-to-face class;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Lee, M. J. (2008). An analysis of the content and improvement strategies of 'educational technology' course In the elementary school teacher education curriculum. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 25(3), 349-377.   DOI
2 Lee, S. G., Ham, Y. M., & Lee, J. H. (2020). A study on evaluation in college mathematics education in the new normal era. Communications of Mathematical Education, 34(4), 421-437.   DOI
3 Lee, S. G., Ham, Y. M., Lee, J. H., & Park, K. E. (2020). A case study on college mathematics education in untact DT era. Communications of Mathematical Education, 34(3), 201-214.   DOI
4 Lee, S. S., & Lee, Y. N. (2007). Development of blended instructional model for creative problem solving. Journal of Educational Technology, 23(2), 135-159.   DOI
5 Leem, J. H., Kim, M. H., & Lee, S. H. (2021). Development of an online instructional design model for higher education in the era with COVID-19. Journal of Educational Technology, 27(1), 281-311.
6 Ministry of Education (2020b). Partial revision of the curriculum for elementary and secondary school and special education curriculum (proposal). December 2020 Mathematics and Curriculum Deliberation Materials. Sejong: Author.
7 Nunan, D. (1988). The learner centered curriculum. Cambridge: CUP.
8 Ministry of Education (2021a). Guidelines for 'non-face-to-face classes' and 'face-to-face classes' in the 2021 era of COVID-19. January 2021 Release of response materials from the Ministry of Education. Web search 2021.03.02. Sejong: Author.
9 Moore, M. G., & Thompson, M. M. (1997). The effects of distance learning: A summary of the literature. PA: American Center for the Study of Distance Education, The Pennsylvania State University.
10 National Institute of Korean Language (2021.03.02.). Standard Korean Dictionary. from https://stdict.korean.go.kr/main/main.do
11 Taba, H. (1962). Curriculum Development: Theory and Practice. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.
12 Saylor, J. G., Alexander, W. M., & Lewis, A. J. (1981). Curriculum planning for better teaching and learning (4th ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
13 Gillani, B. B. (2003). Learning theories and the design of e-learning environment. Lanham: University Press of America.
14 Jeong, H. H., Roh, S. Z., Jung, J. W., & Cho, Y. H. (2020). The challenge of the spread of covid-19 to education: High quality remote learning for everyone. Journal of Educational Technology, 36(3), 645-669.   DOI
15 Lee, J. Y., Sung, E. M., Lee, J. E., Lim, K. Y., & Han, S. Y. (2020). Challenges and tasks facing online classes during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Educational Technology, 36(3), 671-692.   DOI
16 Affouneh, S., Salha, S., & Khlaif, Z. (2020). Designing quality e-learning environments for emnergency remote teaching in coronavirus crisis. Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences, 11(2), 1-3.
17 Chiasson, K., Terras, K., & Smart, K. (2015). Faculty perceptions of moving a face-to-face course to online instruction. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 12(3), 231-240.
18 Choi, S. K., Ahn, I. J., Noh, Y. H., & Kim, J. S. (2013). A comparative study on curriculum contents and teaching methods based on the syllabi of library and information science in Korea and Foreign Universities. Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science Society, 47(2). 223-245.   DOI
19 Jung, J. Y. (2014). The development of a blended PBL learning model in a smart educational environment. The Journal of Thinking Development, 10(1), 145-162.
20 Hur, N. (2015). A study on developing instructional model for flipped learning on pre-service math teachers. Communications of mathematical education, 29(2), 197-214.   DOI
21 Khan, B. H. (2004). E-learning strategies. Hershey: Information Science Publishing.
22 Kim, J. S., Ryu, S. Y., Byun, H. J., & Seo, Y. K. (2020). Analysis of interaction experience through instructional digital imagination in non-face-to-face synchronous classes. Journal of Educational Technology, 36(3), 873-904.   DOI
23 Kim, J. Y., & Park, J. H. (2020). Text-mining analysis for university instructors' experiences in the transition to online teaching. Journal of Educational Technology, 36(3), 839-871.   DOI
24 Korea Science and Creativity Foundation (2020.8). 2020 Teacher Training College Online Education Capability Enhancement Project Proposal Request. Korea Science and Creativity Foundation Project Proposal.
25 Ministry of Education (2020a). Management guide for systematic distance class 2019. News Report. Sejong: Author.
26 Ministry of Education (2021b). The final report of a study on the composition of futureoriented mathematics and curriculum in preparation for post-corona. Sejong: Author.