1 |
Kim, S. & Shin, D. (2019). Exploring the possibilities of character education in various interaction-based mentor program: Focusing on "Becoming a science teacher" activity. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 39(1), 13-33.
DOI
|
2 |
Gilbert, J. K., Boulter, C. J., & Elmer, R. (2000). Positioning models in science education and in design and technology education. In J. K. Gilbert & C. J. Boulter (Eds.), Developing models in science education (pp. 3-17). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
|
3 |
Kelly, G. J. (2008). Inquiry, activity and epistemic practice. In R. A. Duschl & R. E. Grandy (Eds.), Teaching scientific inquiry
|
4 |
Kim, H. (2018). Discussion on the characteristics and framework for PISA science assessment. School Science Journal, 12(4), 389-398.
DOI
|
5 |
Kim, M., & Kim, H. B. (2009). Analysis of the types of scientific models in the life domain of science textbooks. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 29(4), 407-424.
|
6 |
Ku, J., Kim, S., Rim, H., Park, H., & Han, J. A. (2015). Programme for international student assessment(PISA 2015) main survey technical report. Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation. RRE 2015-6-2.
|
7 |
Giere, R. N. (1999) Using models to represent reality. In L. Magnani, N. J. Nersessian, P. Thagard (Eds.), Model-based reasoning in scientific discovery (pp. 41-57). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
|
8 |
Abd-El-Khalick, F., BouJaoude, S., Duschl, R., Lederman, N. G., Mamlok-Naaman, R., Hofstein, A., Niaz, M., Treagust, D., & Tuan, H. L. (2004). Inquiry in science education: International perspectives. Science Education, 88(3), 397-419.
DOI
|
9 |
American Association for the Advancement of Science [AAAS] (1993). Bechmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
|
10 |
Clement, J. (2000). Model based learning as a key research area for science education. International Journal of Science Education, 22(9), 1041-1053.
DOI
|
11 |
Duschl, R. A. (2008). Science education in 3 part harmony: Balancing conceptual, epistemic and social goals. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 268-291.
DOI
|
12 |
Mun, G., Mun, J., Cho, M., Kim, S. Y., & Joseph Krajcik (2012). Development and application of 21st century scientific literacy evaluation framework on Korean high school science text books. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 32(5), 789-804.
DOI
|
13 |
Lee, S., Cho, S., Koo, N., Lee, I., & Lee, S. (2020). An Analysis of the Achievement Characteristics of Korean Students in the Results of PISA 2018: Focusing on the Characteristics of Each Achievement Level and Students with Academic Resilience. RRE 2020-7.
|
14 |
Lee, Y. H. (2013). Nature of science (NOS) presentation in the introductory chapters of Korean high school life science I textbooks using a qualitative content analysis. Journal of Research in Curriculum & Instruction, 17(1), 173-197.
DOI
|
15 |
Ministry of Education [MOE] (2015). Science curriculum. Notification No. 2015-74 [issue 9]. Sejong: Ministry of Education.
|
16 |
OECD (2019b). PISA 2018 Results: What students know and can do (Vol. I). OECD Publishing.
|
17 |
Roberts, D. A. (2007). Scientific literacy/science literacy. In S. K. Abell, & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 729-780). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
|
18 |
Yang, F. Y., Liu, S. Y., Hsu, C. Y., Chiou, G. L., Wu, H. K., Wu, Y. T., Chen, S., Liang, J. C., Tsai, M. J., Lee, S. W. Y., Lee, M. H., Lin, C. L., Chu, R. J., & Tsai, C. C. (2018). High-school students' epistemic knowledge of Science and its relation to learner factors in Science learning. Research in Science Education, 48(2), 325-344.
DOI
|
19 |
National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies.
|
20 |
Park, J. (2016). Discussions about the three aspects of scientific literacy: Focus on integrative understanding, settlement in curriculum, and civic education. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 36(3), 413-422.
DOI
|
21 |
Zeidler, D. L. (2014). Socioscientific issues as a curriculum emphasis: Theory, research, and practice. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research in science education (Vol. 2, pp. 697-726). New York, NY: Routledge.
|
22 |
Anderson, R. D. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 1-12.
DOI
|
23 |
Braaten, M., & Windschitl, M. (2011). Working toward a stronger conceptualization of scientific explanation for science education. Science Education, 95(4), 639-669.
DOI
|
24 |
Berland, L. K., & Reiser, B. J. (2011). Classroom communities' adaptations of the practice of scientific argumentation. Science Education, 95(2), 191-216.
DOI
|
25 |
Brown, B., Reveles, J. M., & Kelly, G. J. (2005). Scientific literacy and discursive identity: A theoretical framework for understanding science learning. Science Education, 89(5), 779-802.
DOI
|
26 |
Duschl, R. A., & Grandy, R. (2013). Two views about explicitly teaching nature of science. Science & Education, 22(9), 2109-2139.
DOI
|
27 |
Harrison, A. G., & Treagust, D. F. (2000). A typology of school science models. International Journal of Science Education, 22(9), 1011-1026.
DOI
|
28 |
Bybee, R. W. (1997). Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practices. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
|
29 |
Cho, S., Ku, N. W., Kim, H., Lee, S., & Lee, I. (2018). OECD programme for international students assessment: Implementation report of PISA 2018. Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation. ORM 2018-87.
|
30 |
Cho, S., Ku, N. W., Kim, H., Lee, S., & Lee, I. (2019). OECD Programme for International Students Assessment: An analysis of PISA 2018 Result. Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation. RRE 2019-11.
|
31 |
Kim, J., Min, B. M., Lee, Y., Son, Y. A., Kim, D. R., & Kim, T. H. (2013). Comparative analysis of the nature of science reflected on the elementary school science textbooks of Korea, Japan, and the U.S. Journal of Research in Curriculum & Instruction, 17(2): 619-644.
DOI
|
32 |
Ministry of Education & Human Resources Development (2007). Science curriculum. Notification No. 2007-79 [issue 9]. Seoul: Ministry of the Ministry of Education & Human Resources Development.
|
33 |
Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (2011). Science curriculum. Notification No. 2011-361 [issue 9]. Seoul: Ministry of Education, Science and Technology.
|
34 |
National Research Council (NRC). (2000). Inquiry and the national science education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
|
35 |
OECD (2019a). PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework. OECD Publishing.
|
36 |
Rim, H. (2013). The Trends and what's new in the OECD PISA and its items. Journal of Research in Curriculum & Instruction, 17(4), 971-990.
DOI
|
37 |
Schwarz, C. V., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Kenyon, L., Acher, A., Fortus, D., Shwartz, Y.., Hug, B.., & Krajcik, J. (2009). Developing a learning progression for scientific modeling: Making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 632-654.
DOI
|
38 |
Stroupe, D. (2014). Examining classroom science practice communities: How teachers and students negotiate epistemic agency and learn science-as-practice. Science Education, 98(3), 487-516.
DOI
|