Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2020.40.4.437

The difference of measurement results between the questionnaire and performance assessment of Pre-service teacher's TPACK competency  

Choi, Kyeongsik (Sejong Academy of Science and Arts)
Paik, Seoung-Hey (Korea National University of Education)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education / v.40, no.4, 2020 , pp. 437-449 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare the results of the developed questionnaire and performance assessment for measuring TPACK competency of pre-service teachers. For this purpose, we developed the TPACK questionnaire for pre-service teachers. Then, through the performance assessment task and interview data related to the 'change of the moon and the celestial bodies', the TPACK competency of the pre-service teachers was analyzed and compared with the questionnaire results. The results of the questionnaire showed that PCK and TPK of the pre-service teachers were high, and the TCK and TPACK were relatively low. However, as a result of analyzing the performance assessment of pre-service teachers who showed low TPK in the questionnaire, it was found that the TPK was high. Conversely, as a result of analyzing the performance assessment of pre-service teachers who showed high TPK in the questionnaire, it was found that the TPK was low. In addition, as a result of analyzing the performance assessment of pre-service teachers who showed low TCK in the questionnaire, it was found that the TCK was very high. Conversely, as a result of analyzing the performance assessment of pre-service teachers who showed high TCK in the questionnaire, the actual TCK competency was found to be low. Although TPCK was high in the questionnaire, TPCK was found to be low through actual results of performance assessment. Through these results, it was confirmed that TPACK measurement tools measure self-efficacy rather than actual capability.
Keywords
Pre-service teacher; TPACK; competency measurement; questionnaire; performance assessment;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2005). What Happens When Teachers Design Educational Technology? The Development of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(2), 131-152.   DOI
2 Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., Hershey, K., & Peruski, L. (2004). With a little help from your students: A new model for faculty development and online course design. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 12(1), 25-55.
3 Koehler, M. J., Shin, T. S., & Mishra, P. (2012). How do we measure TPACK? Let me count the ways. In Educational technology, teacher knowledge, and classroom impact: A research handbook on frameworks and approaches (pp 16-31). IGI Global.
4 Koh, J . H. L ., & Chai, C. S. (2015). Towards a Web 2.0 TPACK lesson design framework: Applications of a Web 2.0 TPACK survey of Singapore preservice teachers. In T. B. Lin, V. Chen, & C. Chai (Eds.), New media and learning in the 21st century (pp. 161-180). Singapore: Springer.
5 Landry, G. A. (2010). Creating and Validating an Instrument to measure Middle Mathematics Teachers' Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge(TPACK), Doctoral Dissertation, University of Tennessee.
6 Lee, D. H., & Whang, W. H. (2017). Development and Validation of TPACK Measurement Tool for Mathematics Teachers. Journal of Korean Society of Mathematics Education Series A: The Mathematical Education, 56(4), 407-434.
7 Lee, H., Linn, M. C., Varma, K., & Liu, O. L. (2010). How do technology-enhanced inquiry science units impact classroom learning? Journal of Research in Sience Teaching, 47, 71-90.   DOI
8 Lee, M. H., & Tsai, C. C. (2010). Exploring teachers' perceived self efficacy and technological pedagogical content knowledge with respect to educational use of the World Wide Web. Instructional Science, 38(1), 1-21.   DOI
9 Linn, M. C., Davis, E. A., Bell, P. (2004). Inquiry and technology. In : Linn, M. C., Davis, E., Bell, P. (eds) Internet environments for science education(pp. 3-28), Routledge.
10 Lundin, J., Svensson, L., Pareto, L., & Lundh Snis, U. (2009). What makes the skilled, skilled?-Conflicts as analytical tools to describe skills in everyday life, information and socio-cultural theory. In T. Karlsohn (Ed.), Society, technology and learning (Vol. 1, p. 195). Stockholm, Sweden: Carlsson.
11 Lux, N. J., Bangert, A. W., & Whittier, D. B. (2011). The development of an instrument to assess preservice teacher's technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 45(4), 415-431.   DOI
12 Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006a). Designing learning from day one: A first day activity to foster design thinking about educational technology. Teachers College Record.
13 Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006b). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers college record, 108(6), 1017-1054.   DOI
14 Mistler-Jackon, M., & Songer, N. B. (2000). Student motivation and internet technology: Are students empowered to learn science? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 459-479.   DOI
15 Niess, M. L. (2011). Investigating TPACK: Knowledge Growth in Teaching with Technology. Journal of Educational Computing Research 4(3), 29-317.
16 Osborn, J., & Hennessy, S. (2003). Literature review in science education and the role of ICT: Promise, Problems and future directions. Bristol: NESTA Futurelab Series.
17 Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Shin, T. S. (2009). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK). Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123-149.   DOI
18 Orlikowski, W. J. (2002). Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in dis tributed organizing. Organization Science, 13(3), 249-273.   DOI
19 Pedersen, J. E., Yerrick, R. K. (2000). Technology in science teacher education: survey of current uses and desired knowledge among science educators. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 11(2), 131-153.
20 Scherer, R., Tondeur, J., Siddiq, F., & Baran, E. (2018). The importance of attitudes toward technology for pre-service teachers' technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge: Comparing structural equa tion modeling approaches. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 67-80.   DOI
21 Schnittka, C. G., & Bell, R. L. (2009). Preservice biology teachers' use of interactive display systems to support reforms-based science instruction. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(2).
22 Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.   DOI
23 Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.   DOI
24 Shin, W., Han, I., & Eom, M. (2012). Influence of Technology Integration Course on Preservice Teachers' Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK), Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 16(1), 71-80.
25 Abbitt, J. T. (2011). Measuring Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Preservice Teacher Education. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(4), 281-300.   DOI
26 So, H.-J., & Kim, B. (2009). Learning about problem based learning: Student teachers integrating technology, pedagogy and content knowledge. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(1), 101-116.   DOI
27 Songer, N. B., Lee, H. S., Kam, R. (2002). Technology-rich inquiry science in urban classrooms; what are the barriers to inquiry pedagogy? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(2), 128-150.   DOI
28 Varma, K., Husic, F., & Linn, M. C. (2008). Targeted support for using technology-enhanced science inquiry models. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17, 341-356.   DOI
29 Willermark, S. (2018). Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge: A Review of Empirical Studies Published From 2011 to 2016. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 56(3), 315-343.   DOI
30 Wothke, W. (1993) Nonpositive definite matrices in structural modeling. In K.A. Bollen & J.S. Long (Eds.), Testing Structural Equation Models (Chap. 11, pp. 256-293). Newbury Park NJ: Sage.
31 Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255-284.   DOI
32 Higgins, T. E., & Spitulnik, M. W. (2008). Supporting teachers' use of technology in science instruction through professional development: A literature review. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17, 511-521.   DOI
33 Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2007). Educational research: An introduction (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
34 Graham, C. R., Burgoyne, N., Cantrel, P., Smith, L., Clair, L.S. & Haris, R. (2009). TPACK development in science teaching: Measuring the TPACK confidence of inservice science teachers. TechTrends 53(5), 70-79.   DOI
35 Guzey, S. S., & Roehrig, G. (2009). Teaching Science with Technology: Case Studies of Science Teachers' Development of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 25-45.
36 Jang, S. J., & Tsai, M. F. (2012). Exploring the TPACK of Taiwanese elementary math ematics and science teachers with respect to use of interactive whiteboards. Computers & Education, 59(2), 327-338   DOI
37 Jung, J., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2020). Course-level modeling of pre-service teacher learning of technology integration. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(2), 555-571.   DOI
38 Kang, S., & Jang M. (2016). On secondary mathematics teachers' technology integration. Journal of Korean Society of Mathematics Education Series A: The Mathematical Education, 55(4), 523-538.
39 Kim, M. C., Hannafin, M. J., & Bryan, L. A. (2007). Technology-enhanced inquiry tools in science education; An emerging pedagogical framework for classroom practice. Science Education, 91, 1010-1030.   DOI
40 Archambault, L. M., & Barnett, J. H. (2010). Revisiting technological pedagogical content knowledge: Exploring the TPACK framework. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1656-1662.   DOI
41 Bell, R. L., & Trundle, K. C. (2008). The use of a computer simulation to promote scientific conceptions of moon phases. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 346-372.   DOI
42 Biswas, G., Leelawong, K., Schwartz, D., & Vye, N. (2005). TTAG at Vanderbilt Learning by teaching: A new agent paradigm for educational software. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 19(3-4), 363-392.   DOI
43 Carr, A. A., Jonassen, D. H., Litzinger, M. E., & Marra, R. M. (1998). Good ideas to foment educational revolution: The role of systematic change in advancing situated learning, constructivism, and feminist pedagogy. Educational Technology, 38(1), 5-14.
44 Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., Tsai, C. C., & Tan, L. L. W. (2011). Modeling primary school pre-service teachers' Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) for meaningful learning with information and communication technology (ICT). Computers & Education, 57(1), 1184-1193.   DOI
45 Choe, H., & Lee, T. (2015). Implementation and Analysis about Technology Knowledge Education Program for Pre-service Teacher based on the TPACK Model. Journal of The Korea Society of Computer and Information, 20(2), 231-239.   DOI
46 Choi, E. S., Lee, Y., & Paik, S. H. (2017). The effects of programming-based lessons on science teachers' perceptions related to TPACK. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education. 37(4), 693-703.   DOI
47 Daniel, C. E., Douglas, N. G. & Roy, D. P. (1999). Addressing the challenges of inquiry-based learning through technology and curriculum design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8(3&4), 391-450.   DOI
48 Duke, N. K., & Mallette, M. H. (Eds.). (2004). Literacy research methodologies. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.