High School Students' Verbal and Physical Interactions Appeared in Collaborative Science Concept Learning Using Augmented Reality |
Shin, Seokjin
(Seoul National University)
Kim, Haerheen (Seoul National University) Noh, Taehee (Seoul National University) Lee, Jaewon (Seoul National University) |
1 | Korea Education & Research Information Service [KERIS] (2007). Educational understanding of augmented reality. Seoul: Korea Education & Research Information Service. 2007 KERIS Issue Report. Report No. RM 2007-30. |
2 | Abram, P., Scarloss, B., Holthuis, N., Cohen, E., Lotan, R., & Schultz, S. E. (2002). The use of evaluation criteria to improve academic discussion in cooperative groups. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 22(1), 16-27. DOI |
3 | Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science & Creativity [KOFAC] (2015). Science level up. Retrieved Jan 16, 2020, from https://sciencelevelup.kofac.re.kr/ |
4 | Kye, B., & Kim, Y. (2008). Investigation on the relationships among media characteristics, presence, flow, and learning effects in augmented reality based learning. Journal of Educational Technology, 24(4), 193-224. DOI |
5 | Lee, H. J. (2011). Conceptual change by peer instruction of 6th grade students in science fields. Master's Thesis, Korea National University of Education, Cheongju. |
6 | Lee, J., Noh, T., & Lee, S. (2017). The characteristics of instrumental genesis appearing in the processes of high school students' school scientific inquiries. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 37(6), 971-980. DOI |
7 | Li, N., Gu, Y. X., Chang, L., & Duh, H. B.-L. (2011). Influences of AR-supported simulation on learning effectiveness in face-to-face collaborative learning for physics. Paper presented at the 2011 IEEE 11th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies(pp. 320-322). Georgia, USA. |
8 | Liu, P.-H. E., & Tsai, M.-K. (2013). Using augmented-reality-based mobile learning material in EFL English composition: An exploratory case study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(1), E1-E4. DOI |
9 | Matcha, W., & Rambli, D. R. A. (2013). Exploratory study on collaborative interaction through the use of augmented reality in science learning. Procedia Computer Science, 25, 144-153. DOI |
10 | Matthews, M. R. (2002). Constructivism and science education: A further appraisal. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 11(2), 121-134. DOI |
11 | Bunterm, T., Lee, K., Ng Lan Kong, J., Srikoon, S., Vangpoomyai, P., Rattanavongsa, J., & Rachahoon, G. (2014). Do different levels of inquiry lead to different learning outcomes? A comparison between guided and structured inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 36(12), 1937-1959. DOI |
12 | Akcayir, M., & Akcayir, G. (2017). Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education: A systematic review of the literature. Educational Research Review, 20, 1-11. DOI |
13 | Arici, F., Yildirim, P., Caliklar, Ş., & Yilmaz, R. M. (2019). Research trends in the use of augmented reality in science education: Content and bibliometric mapping analysis. Computers & Education, 142, 103647. DOI |
14 | Azuma, R. T. (1997). A survey of augmented reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 6(4), 355-385. DOI |
15 | Chiang, T. H. C., Yang, S. J. H., & Hwang, G.-J. (2014). Students' online interactive patterns in augmented reality-based inquiry activities. Computers & Education, 78, 97-108. DOI |
16 | Jang, S.-H., & Kye, B.-K. (2007). Educational application of augmented reality contents [증강현실(Augmented Reality) 콘텐츠의 교육적 적용]. The Korea Contents Association Review, 5(2), 79-85. DOI |
17 | Chinn, C. A., & Malhotra, B. A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86(2), 175-218. DOI |
18 | Diegmann, P., Schmidt-Kraepelin, M., Eynden, S., & Basten, D. (2015). Benefits of augmented reality in educational environments: A systematic literature review. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference(pp. 1542-1566) Wirtschaftsinformatik, Osnabruck, Germany. |
19 | Dunleavy, M., Dede, C., & Mitchell, R. (2009). Affordances and limitations of immersive participatory augmented reality simulations for teaching and learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(1), 7-22. DOI |
20 | Gillies, R. M. (2004). The effects of cooperative learning on junior high school students during small group learning. Learning and Instruction, 14(2), 197-213. DOI |
21 | Joo, Y., Kim, K., & Noh, T. (2014). A comparison of verbal interaction patterns in science cooperative learning based on grouping by middle school students' collectivism. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 34(3), 221-233. DOI |
22 | Jung, Y., Sung, Y., Lim, S., Ryu, J., Seo, H., & Ahn, H. (2017). A study on the implementation of future digital textbooks [미래형 디지털 교과서 구현 방안 연구]. Seoul: Korea Education & Research Information Service. Report No. CR 2017-4. |
23 | Kang, S., Kim, C., & Noh, T. (2000). Analysis of verbal interaction in small group discussion. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 20(3), 353-200. |
24 | Kim, K.-H. (2009). The effects of learning activities on the application of augmented reality contents in elementary science instruction. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, 12(5), 75-85. DOI |
25 | Pedersen, S., & Irby, T. (2014). The VELscience project: Middle schoolers' engagement in student-directed inquiry within a virtual environment for learning. Computers & Education, 71, 33-42. DOI |
26 | Munoz-Cristobal, J. A., Jorrin-Abellan, I. M., Asensio-Perez, J. I., Martinez-Mones, A., Prieto, L. P., & Dimitriadis, Y. (2014). Supporting teacher orchestration in ubiquitous learning environments: A study in primary education. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 8(1), 83-97. DOI |
27 | Nielsen, B. L., Brandt, H., & Swensen, H. (2016). Augmented reality in science education: Affordances for student learning. Nordic Studies in Science Education, 12(2), 157-174. DOI |
28 | Norman, D. A. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. New York: Doubleday. |
29 | Price, S., & Rogers, Y. (2004). Let's get physical: The learning benefits of interacting in digitally augmented physical spaces. Computers & Education, 43(1-2), 137-151. DOI |
30 | Ryu, J., Jo, I., Heo, H., Kim, J., & Kye, B. (2006). The next generation of learning model for augmented reality enhanced in tangible interface. Seoul: Korea Education & Research Information Service. Report No. CR 2006-18. |
31 | Schmid, S., & Bogner, F. X. (2017). How an inquiry-based classroom lesson intervenes in science efficacy, career-orientation and self-determination. International Journal of Science Education, 39(17), 2342-2360. DOI |
32 | Yuen, S. C. Y., Yaoyuneyong, G., & Johnson, E. (2011). Augmented reality: An overview and five directions for AR in education. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 4(1), 119-140. |
33 | Verillon, P., & Rabardel, P. (1995). Cognition and artifacts: A contribution to the study of though in relation to instrumented activity. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 10(1), 77-101. DOI |
34 | Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. |
35 | Wu, H.-K., Lee, S. W.-Y., Chang, H.-Y., & Liang, J.-C. (2013). Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education. Computers & Education, 62, 41-49. DOI |
36 | Yun, J., Kang, S., Ahn, I., & Noh, T. (2017). Analyses of verbal interaction among students in small group science learning using smart devices. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 61(3), 104-111. DOI |
37 | Shelton, B. E. (2003). How augmented reality helps students learn dynamic spatial relationships. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle, USA. |
38 | Seo, H. (2008). Relationships among presence, learning flow, attitude toward usability, and learning achievement in an augmented reality interactive learning environment. Journal of Korean Association for Educational Information and Media, 14(3), 137-165. |