Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2020.40.2.191

High School Students' Verbal and Physical Interactions Appeared in Collaborative Science Concept Learning Using Augmented Reality  

Shin, Seokjin (Seoul National University)
Kim, Haerheen (Seoul National University)
Noh, Taehee (Seoul National University)
Lee, Jaewon (Seoul National University)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education / v.40, no.2, 2020 , pp. 191-201 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study investigated verbal and physical interactions which appeared in collaborative science concept learning using augmented reality. Twelve 10th grade students participated in this study. After being organized into three four-member small groups, they participated in classes using smart device-based augmented reality application developed for the understanding of the chemical bonding concept. Their class activities were audio- and video-taped. Semi-structured interviews were also conducted. The results revealed that within individual statement units of verbal interaction, the proportions of information question/explanation and direction question/explanation were found to be high. Within interaction units, the proportions of reformative and cumulative interaction were relatively high. The proportions of progress were also found to be high within both individual statement units and interaction units of verbal interaction. Students' physical interactions were mainly conducted without meaningful verbal interactions. When their physical interactions were accompanied by knowledge construction-related verbal interactions, the proportions of gazing virtual objects and worksheet-related interactions were high. In contrast, various exploratory activities related to the manipulation of markers mainly appeared when they conducted physical interactions only, or when their physical interactions were accompanied by management-related verbal interactions. On the bases of the results, effective methods for collaborative concept learning using augmented reality in science education are discussed.
Keywords
augmented reality; verbal interaction; physical interaction; collaborative learning;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Korea Education & Research Information Service [KERIS] (2007). Educational understanding of augmented reality. Seoul: Korea Education & Research Information Service. 2007 KERIS Issue Report. Report No. RM 2007-30.
2 Abram, P., Scarloss, B., Holthuis, N., Cohen, E., Lotan, R., & Schultz, S. E. (2002). The use of evaluation criteria to improve academic discussion in cooperative groups. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 22(1), 16-27.   DOI
3 Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science & Creativity [KOFAC] (2015). Science level up. Retrieved Jan 16, 2020, from https://sciencelevelup.kofac.re.kr/
4 Kye, B., & Kim, Y. (2008). Investigation on the relationships among media characteristics, presence, flow, and learning effects in augmented reality based learning. Journal of Educational Technology, 24(4), 193-224.   DOI
5 Lee, H. J. (2011). Conceptual change by peer instruction of 6th grade students in science fields. Master's Thesis, Korea National University of Education, Cheongju.
6 Lee, J., Noh, T., & Lee, S. (2017). The characteristics of instrumental genesis appearing in the processes of high school students' school scientific inquiries. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 37(6), 971-980.   DOI
7 Li, N., Gu, Y. X., Chang, L., & Duh, H. B.-L. (2011). Influences of AR-supported simulation on learning effectiveness in face-to-face collaborative learning for physics. Paper presented at the 2011 IEEE 11th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies(pp. 320-322). Georgia, USA.
8 Liu, P.-H. E., & Tsai, M.-K. (2013). Using augmented-reality-based mobile learning material in EFL English composition: An exploratory case study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(1), E1-E4.   DOI
9 Matcha, W., & Rambli, D. R. A. (2013). Exploratory study on collaborative interaction through the use of augmented reality in science learning. Procedia Computer Science, 25, 144-153.   DOI
10 Matthews, M. R. (2002). Constructivism and science education: A further appraisal. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 11(2), 121-134.   DOI
11 Bunterm, T., Lee, K., Ng Lan Kong, J., Srikoon, S., Vangpoomyai, P., Rattanavongsa, J., & Rachahoon, G. (2014). Do different levels of inquiry lead to different learning outcomes? A comparison between guided and structured inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 36(12), 1937-1959.   DOI
12 Akcayir, M., & Akcayir, G. (2017). Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education: A systematic review of the literature. Educational Research Review, 20, 1-11.   DOI
13 Arici, F., Yildirim, P., Caliklar, Ş., & Yilmaz, R. M. (2019). Research trends in the use of augmented reality in science education: Content and bibliometric mapping analysis. Computers & Education, 142, 103647.   DOI
14 Azuma, R. T. (1997). A survey of augmented reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 6(4), 355-385.   DOI
15 Chiang, T. H. C., Yang, S. J. H., & Hwang, G.-J. (2014). Students' online interactive patterns in augmented reality-based inquiry activities. Computers & Education, 78, 97-108.   DOI
16 Jang, S.-H., & Kye, B.-K. (2007). Educational application of augmented reality contents [증강현실(Augmented Reality) 콘텐츠의 교육적 적용]. The Korea Contents Association Review, 5(2), 79-85.   DOI
17 Chinn, C. A., & Malhotra, B. A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86(2), 175-218.   DOI
18 Diegmann, P., Schmidt-Kraepelin, M., Eynden, S., & Basten, D. (2015). Benefits of augmented reality in educational environments: A systematic literature review. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference(pp. 1542-1566) Wirtschaftsinformatik, Osnabruck, Germany.
19 Dunleavy, M., Dede, C., & Mitchell, R. (2009). Affordances and limitations of immersive participatory augmented reality simulations for teaching and learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(1), 7-22.   DOI
20 Gillies, R. M. (2004). The effects of cooperative learning on junior high school students during small group learning. Learning and Instruction, 14(2), 197-213.   DOI
21 Joo, Y., Kim, K., & Noh, T. (2014). A comparison of verbal interaction patterns in science cooperative learning based on grouping by middle school students' collectivism. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 34(3), 221-233.   DOI
22 Jung, Y., Sung, Y., Lim, S., Ryu, J., Seo, H., & Ahn, H. (2017). A study on the implementation of future digital textbooks [미래형 디지털 교과서 구현 방안 연구]. Seoul: Korea Education & Research Information Service. Report No. CR 2017-4.
23 Kang, S., Kim, C., & Noh, T. (2000). Analysis of verbal interaction in small group discussion. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 20(3), 353-200.
24 Kim, K.-H. (2009). The effects of learning activities on the application of augmented reality contents in elementary science instruction. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, 12(5), 75-85.   DOI
25 Pedersen, S., & Irby, T. (2014). The VELscience project: Middle schoolers' engagement in student-directed inquiry within a virtual environment for learning. Computers & Education, 71, 33-42.   DOI
26 Munoz-Cristobal, J. A., Jorrin-Abellan, I. M., Asensio-Perez, J. I., Martinez-Mones, A., Prieto, L. P., & Dimitriadis, Y. (2014). Supporting teacher orchestration in ubiquitous learning environments: A study in primary education. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 8(1), 83-97.   DOI
27 Nielsen, B. L., Brandt, H., & Swensen, H. (2016). Augmented reality in science education: Affordances for student learning. Nordic Studies in Science Education, 12(2), 157-174.   DOI
28 Norman, D. A. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. New York: Doubleday.
29 Price, S., & Rogers, Y. (2004). Let's get physical: The learning benefits of interacting in digitally augmented physical spaces. Computers & Education, 43(1-2), 137-151.   DOI
30 Ryu, J., Jo, I., Heo, H., Kim, J., & Kye, B. (2006). The next generation of learning model for augmented reality enhanced in tangible interface. Seoul: Korea Education & Research Information Service. Report No. CR 2006-18.
31 Schmid, S., & Bogner, F. X. (2017). How an inquiry-based classroom lesson intervenes in science efficacy, career-orientation and self-determination. International Journal of Science Education, 39(17), 2342-2360.   DOI
32 Yuen, S. C. Y., Yaoyuneyong, G., & Johnson, E. (2011). Augmented reality: An overview and five directions for AR in education. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 4(1), 119-140.
33 Verillon, P., & Rabardel, P. (1995). Cognition and artifacts: A contribution to the study of though in relation to instrumented activity. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 10(1), 77-101.   DOI
34 Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
35 Wu, H.-K., Lee, S. W.-Y., Chang, H.-Y., & Liang, J.-C. (2013). Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education. Computers & Education, 62, 41-49.   DOI
36 Yun, J., Kang, S., Ahn, I., & Noh, T. (2017). Analyses of verbal interaction among students in small group science learning using smart devices. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 61(3), 104-111.   DOI
37 Shelton, B. E. (2003). How augmented reality helps students learn dynamic spatial relationships. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
38 Seo, H. (2008). Relationships among presence, learning flow, attitude toward usability, and learning achievement in an augmented reality interactive learning environment. Journal of Korean Association for Educational Information and Media, 14(3), 137-165.