1 |
Colley, C., & Windschitl, M. (2016). Rigor in elementary science students' discourse: The role of responsiveness and supportive conditions for talk. Science Education, 100(6), 1009-1038.
DOI
|
2 |
Empson, S. B., & Jacobs, V. R. (2008). Learning to listen to children's mathematics. In T. Wood (Series Ed.) & D. Tirosh & T. Wood (Eds.), Tools and Processes in Mathematics Teacher Education : Volume 2, (pp. 257-281). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
|
3 |
Forzani, F. M. (2014). Understanding "core practices" and "practice-based" teacher education: Learning from the past. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(4), 357-368.
DOI
|
4 |
Ha, H., & Kim, H. B. (2017). Exploring Responsive Teaching's Effect on Students' Epistemological Framing in Small Group Argumentation, Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 37(1), 63-75.
DOI
|
5 |
Ha, H., Lee, Y., & Kim, H. B. (2018). Exploring the Teachers' Responsive Teaching Practice and Epistemological Framing in Whole Class Discussion After Small Group Argumentation Activity. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 38(1), 11-26.
DOI
|
6 |
Hammer, D. (1997). Discovery learning and discovery teaching. Cognition and Instruction, 15, 485-529.
DOI
|
7 |
Hammer, D., Goldberg, F. & Fargason, S. (2012). Responsive teaching and the beginnings of energy in a third grade classroom. Review of Science, Mathematics and ICT Education, 6(1), 51-72.
|
8 |
Hammer, D. & Sikorski, T. R. (2015). Implications of complexity for research on learning progressions. Science Education, 99(3), 424-431.
DOI
|
9 |
Jacobs, V. R., Lamb, L. L. C., & Philipp, R. A. (2010). Professional noticing of children's mathematical thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41(2), 169-202.
DOI
|
10 |
Kang, H., & Anderson, C. W. (2015). Supporting Preservice Science Teachers' Ability to Attend and Respond to Student Thinking by Design. Science Education, 99(5), 863-895.
DOI
|
11 |
Kavanagh, S. S., Metz, M., Hauser, M., Fogo, B., Taylor, M., & Carlson, J. (2019). Practicing responsiveness: Using approximations of teaching to develop teachers' responsiveness to students' ideas. Journal of Teacher Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0022487119841884
|
12 |
Kim, T. H. (2019). A Qualitative case study to Understand Learner-centered Social studies education: Focused on the Perception of Teacher at A middle and high school. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 19(8), 441-464.
DOI
|
13 |
Kwak, Y. (2002). Impacts and Tasks of Teacher Education Programs Revealed by Preservice Teachers: Students' Intact Beliefs. The Journal of The Korean Earth Science Society, 23(4), 309-323.
|
14 |
Kwak, Y., & Shin, Y. (2019). Analysis of Enacted Curriculum through Classroom Observation of Integrated Science Teaching in 2015 Revised Curriculum. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 39(3), 379-388.
DOI
|
15 |
Lee, J. (2017). An Analysis of Preservice Teachers' Lesson Plays: How Do Preservice Teachers Give Feedbacks to Students in an Imaginary Classroom Discourse?. School Mathematics, 19(1), 19-41.
|
16 |
Lee, J. & So, K. (2017). Middle School Teachers' Understanding of "Student-Participatory Class". Journal of Educational Studies, 48(2), 141-165.
DOI
|
17 |
Levin, D. M., Grant, T., & Hammer, D. (2012). Attending and responding to student thinking in science. The American Biology Teacher, 74(3), 158-162.
DOI
|
18 |
Levin, D. M., Hammer, D., & Coffey, J. E. (2009). Novice teachers' attention to student thinking. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(2), 142-154.
DOI
|
19 |
McDonald, M., Kazemi, E., & Kavanagh, S. S. (2013). Core practices and pedagogies of teacher education: A call for a common language and collective activity. Journal of Teacher Education, 64, 378-386.
DOI
|
20 |
Lineback, J. E. (2015). The redirection: An indicator of how teachers respond to student thinking. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 24(3), 419-460.
DOI
|
21 |
Ministry of Education (2015). 2015 revised science curriculum. Ministry of Education 2015-74 [issue 9].
|
22 |
Moje, E. B. (2015). Doing and teaching disciplinary literacy with adolescent learners: A social and cultural enterprise. Harvard Educational Review, 85(2), 254-278.
DOI
|
23 |
Nam, Y., Yi, H., Kim, H., & Jeong, J. H. (2019). Suggestions of Ways to Improve Teaching Practicum Based on the Experiences of Pre-Service Teachers. Journal of Educational Innovation Research, 29(1), 65-89.
DOI
|
24 |
Newmann, F. M., & Wehlage, G. G. (1993). Five standards of authentic instruction. Educational Leadership, 50(7), 8-12.
|
25 |
Nystrand, M., & Gamoran, A. (1990). Student Engagement: When Recitation Becomes Conversation.
|
26 |
Oh, J., & Oh, P. S. (2017). An exploration of the possibility of implementing 'responsive teaching' (RT) in elementary science classrooms. Elementary Science Education, 36(3), 227-245.
|
27 |
Maskiewicz, A. C., & Winters, V. A. (2012). Understanding the coconstruction of inquiry practices: A case study of a responsive teaching environment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(4), 429-464.
DOI
|
28 |
Oh, P. S. (2015). A Theoretical Review and Trial Application of the 'Resources-Based View' (RBV) as an Alternative Cognitive Theory. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(6), 971-984.
DOI
|
29 |
Pierson, J. L. (2008). The relationship between patterns of classroom discourse and mathematics learning. The University of Texas at Austin.
|
30 |
Park, J., & Kim, H. B. (2018). Exploring Teachers' Responsive Teaching Practice in Argumentation-Based Science Classroom:Focus on Structural and Dialogical Aspects of Argument. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 38(1), 69-85.
DOI
|
31 |
Richards, J., & Robertson, A. D. (2016). A review of the research on responsive teaching in science and mathematics. In A. D. Robertson, R. E. Scherr, & D. Hammer (Eds.), Responsive teaching in science and mathematics(pp.36-55). New York, NY, Routledge.
|
32 |
Robertson, A. D., Atkins, L. J., Levin, D. M., & Richards, J. (2016). What is responsive teaching? In A. D. Robertson, R. E. Scherr, & D. Hammer (Eds.), Responsive teaching in science and mathematics(pp.1-35). New York, NY: Routledge.
|
33 |
Russ, R. S., & Luna, M. J. (2013). Inferring teacher epistemological framing from local patterns in teacher noticing. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(3), 284-314.
DOI
|
34 |
Sherin, M. G., & van Es, E. A. (2009). Effects of video club participation on teachers' professional vision. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 20-37.
DOI
|
35 |
van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2008). Mathematics teachers' "learning to notice" in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 244-276.
DOI
|
36 |
Yoon, H. G., Park, J., Song, Y., Kim, M., & Joung, Y. J. (2018). Analyzing Studies on Teacher Professional Vision: A Literature Review. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 38(6), 765-780.
DOI
|
37 |
Richards, J., & Elby, A. (2014). Incorporating disciplinary practices into characterizations of progress in responsive teaching. Journal of Learning Sciences, 1-29.
|
38 |
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139-148.
|
39 |
Bain, R. B. (2006). Rounding up unusual suspects: Facing the authority hidden in the history classroom. Teachers College Record, 108(10), 2080-2114.
DOI
|
40 |
Ball, D. L. (1993). With an eye on the mathematical horizon: Dilemmas of teaching elementary school mathematics. Elementary School Journal, 93, 373-397.
DOI
|
41 |
Choi, K., Park, J. Y., Choi, B. S., Nam, J., Choi, K. S., & Lee, K. S. (2004). Analysis of verbal interaction between teachers and students in middle school science classroom. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 24(6), 1039-1048.
|