1 |
Bernard, P., & Dudek, K. (2017). Revisiting students' perceptions of research scientist - outcomes of an indirect draw-a-scientist test (INDAST). Journal of Baltic Science Education, 16(4), 562-575.
|
2 |
Boone, W. J., Staver, J. R., & Yale, M. S. (2014). Rasch Analysis in the Human Sciences. New York, NY: Springer.
|
3 |
Bray, D., & von Storch, H. (1999). Climate science: An empirical example of postnormal science. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 80(3), 439-456.
DOI
|
4 |
Bray, D., & von Storch, H. (2017). The Normative Orientations of Climate Scientists. Science and Engineering Ethics, 23(5), 1351-1367.
DOI
|
5 |
Broome, T. H., & Peirce, J. (1997). The heroic engineer. Journal of Engineering Education, 86, 51-55.
DOI
|
6 |
Chambers, D. W. (1983). Stereotypic images of the scientist: The draw-ascientist test. Science Education, 67(2), 255-265.
DOI
|
7 |
Choi, K. H. (2005). Contemplation of Scientist's Social Role, Responsibility and its Educational Methods. Journal of Science & Technology Studies, 10, 49-67.
|
8 |
Galison, P. (1997). Image and logic: A material culture of microphysics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
|
9 |
Gaston, J. (1978). The reward system in British and American science. New York: A Wiley-Interscience Publication.
|
10 |
George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for windows step by step: A simple guide and reference 11.0 update. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
|
11 |
Hagstrom, W. O. (1965). The scientific community. New York: Basic Books.
|
12 |
Irzik, G., & Nola, R. (2011). A family resemblance approach to the nature of science for science education. Science & Education, 20, 591-607.
DOI
|
13 |
Kilinc, A., Demiral, U., & Kartal, T. (2017). Resistance to dialogic discourse in SSI teaching: The effects of an argumentation-based workshop, teaching practicum, and induction on a preservice science teacher. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(6), 764-789.
DOI
|
14 |
Kim, H. S. (2012). Climate change, science and community. Public Understanding of Science, 21(3), 268-285.
DOI
|
15 |
Kreuter, F., Presser, S., & Tourangeau, R. (2008). Social Desirability Bias in CATI, IVR, and Web SurveysThe Effects of Mode and Question Sensitivity. Public opinion quarterly, 72(5), 847-865.
DOI
|
16 |
Krumpal, I. (2013). Determinants of social desirability bias in sensitive surveys: A literature review. Quality & Quantity, 47(4), 2025-2047.
DOI
|
17 |
Lederman, N. G., Schwartz, R. S., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Bell, R. L. (2001). Pre-service teachers' understanding and teaching of nature of science: An intervention study. Canadian Journal of Math, Science & Technology Education, 1(2), 135-160.
DOI
|
18 |
Lee, J. K., Lee, T. K., & Ha M. (2013). Exploring the Evolution Patterns of Trading Zones Appearing in the Convergence of Teachers' Ideas: The Case Study of a Learning Community of Teaching Volunteers 'STEAM Teacher Community. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 33(5), 1055-1084.
DOI
|
19 |
Lee, Y. H. (2003). Beyond the ‘Science Wars': New direction of sociology of science. Economy and Society, 60, 195-217.
|
20 |
Macfarlane, B., & Cheng, M. (2008). Communism, universalism and disinterestedness: Re-examining contemporary support among academics for Merton's scientific norms. Journal of Academic Ethics, 6(1), 67-78.
DOI
|
21 |
Merton, R. K. (1973). The sociology of science. University of Chicago Press.
|
22 |
Mesci, G., & Renee'S, S. (2017). Changing preservice science teachers' views of nature of science: why some conceptions may be more easily altered than others. Research in Science Education, 47(2), 329-351.
DOI
|
23 |
Messick, S. (1995). Standards of validity and the validity of standards in performance assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 14(4), 5-8.
DOI
|
24 |
MEST (Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology). (2011). 2009 revised science curriculum. Seoul: MEST.
|
25 |
Ministry of Education. (2015). 2015 revised Science National Curriculum. Ministry of Education.
|
26 |
Mitroff, I. (1974). Norm and counter-norm in a selected group of the Apollo moon scientists. American Sociological Review, 39, 579-595.
DOI
|
27 |
MOE (Ministry of education). (2015). 2015 revised national curriculum of science. Seoul: Ministry of Education.
|
28 |
Mulkay, M. J. (1976). Norms and ideologies in science. Social Science Information, 15, 637-656.
DOI
|
29 |
Narayan, R., Park, S., Peker, D., & Suh, J. (2013). Students' images of scientists and doing science: An international comparison study. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 9(2), 115-129.
|
30 |
Nederhof, A. J. (1985). Methods of coping with social desirability bias: A review. European journal of social psychology, 15(3), 263-280.
DOI
|
31 |
Oreskes, N. (1996). Objectivity or heroism? On the invisivility of woman in science. Osiris, 11, 87-113.
DOI
|
32 |
Palmquist, B. C., & Finley, F. N. (1997). Preservice teachers' views of the nature of science during a postbaccalaureate science teaching program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(6), 595-615.
DOI
|
33 |
Polanyi, M. (1962). The republic of science. Minerva, 1(1), 54-73.
DOI
|
34 |
Scrucca, L., Fop, M., Murphy, T. B., & Raftery, A. E. (2016). mclust 5: Clustering, classification and density estimation using gaussian finite mixture models. The R journal, 8(1), 289-317.
DOI
|
35 |
Shin, S., Lee, J. K., & Ha, M. (2016). Pre-service biology teachers' value orientation related to observation and representation: Focus on objectivity. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 36(4), 617-628.
DOI
|
36 |
Sismondo, S. (2004). An introduction to science and technology studies. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
|
37 |
Smith, C. H. L. (1999). International collaboration in science and technology: Lessons from CERN. European Review, 7(1), 77-92.
DOI
|
38 |
Stohr, K. (2003). A multicentre collaboration to investigate the cause of severe acute respiratory syndrome. The Lancet, 361, 1730-1733.
DOI
|
39 |
Torresen, J. (2018). A review of future and ethical perspectives of robotics and AI. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 4(75), 1-10.
DOI
|
40 |
Vermeulen, N., Parker, J. N., & Penders, B. (2013). Understanding life together: A brief history of collaboration in biology. Endeavour, 37(3), 162-171.
DOI
|
41 |
White, R., & Wallace, J. (1999). Heroism and science education reform. Research in Science Education, 29(4), 417-430.
DOI
|
42 |
Wright, B.D. & Linacre, J.M. (1994). Reasonable mean-square-fit values. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 8(3), 370.
|
43 |
Zeidler, D. L., & Nichols, B. H. (2009). Socioscientific issues: Theory and practice. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(2), 49-58.
DOI
|
44 |
Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond STS: A research-based, framework for socioscientific issues education. Science Education, 89, 357- 377.
DOI
|
45 |
Ziman, J. (2000). Real science: What it is, and what it means. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
|
46 |
Asilomar. (2017). Available at: https://futureoflife.org/ai-principles/
|
47 |
Anderson, M. S., Martinson, B. C., & De Vries, R. (2007). Normative dissonance in science: Results from a national survey of US scientists. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 2(4), 3-14.
DOI
|
48 |
Bak, H. J. (2010). Factors affecting the selection of research topics among Korean scientists - Pure scientific concern, external interests or peer recognition. Economy & Society, 85, 211-236.
|
49 |
Bak, H. J. (2006). Commercialization of science and changing normative structure of scientific community. Korean Journal of Sociology, 40(4), 19-47.
|
50 |
Bak, H. J. (2007). Perceptions and evaluation of norms of science among Korean scientific community. Journal of Science & Tecnology Studies, 7(2), 91-124.
|