1 |
Carini, R. M., Kuh, G. D., & Klein, S. P. (2006). Student engagement and student learning: Testing the linkages. Research in Higher Education, 47(1), 1-32.
DOI
|
2 |
Case, S. (2007). Reconfiguring and realigning the assessment feedback processes for an undergraduate criminology degree. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(3), 285-299.
DOI
|
3 |
Fernández-Balboa, J. M., & Stiehl, J. (1995). The generic nature of pedagogical content knowledge among college professors. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(3), 293-306.
DOI
|
4 |
Fraser, S. P. (2016). Pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): Exploring its usefulness for science lecturers in higher education. Research in Science Education, 46(1), 141-161.
DOI
|
5 |
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410-8415.
DOI
|
6 |
Friedrichsen, P. M., & Dana, T. M. (2005). Substantive-level theory of highly regarded secondary biology teachers' science teaching orientations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(2), 218-244.
DOI
|
7 |
Hong, S. (2010). Analysis on effectiveness of instructional consultation in higher education. Asian Journal of Education, 11(3), 97-127.
DOI
|
8 |
Jang, J., & Lee, H. (2016). Exploration of engineering professors' teaching orientations toward engineering courses. Journal of Engineering Education Research, 19(3), 23-34.
DOI
|
9 |
Jang, S. J., Guan, S. Y., & Hsieh, H. F. (2009). Developing an instrument for assessing college students' perceptions of teachers' pedagogical content knowledge. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 596-606.
DOI
|
10 |
Kil, Y. (2011). Characteristics of teaching methods and teaching behaviors used by the professors. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 28(4), 405-428.
DOI
|
11 |
Kim, J., Choi, Y.-H., & Kim, S.-K. (2008). Analysis of in-service status and educational needs of engineering faculties. Journal of Engineering Education Research, 11(2), 50-64.
DOI
|
12 |
Kim, T.-W., Lee, G., Choi, M.-S., Eom, W.-Y., & Choi, S.-Y. (2006). A survey on professors' and students' perception about effective teaching and learning methods for humanities and a case study of excellent teaching examples. Journal of Educational Studies, 37(1), 101-128.
|
13 |
Lammers, W. J., & Murphy, J. J. (2002). A profile of teaching techniques used in the university classroom: A descriptive profile of a US public university. Active Learning in Higher Education, 3(1), 54-67.
DOI
|
14 |
Lee, J.-K. (2015). Analysis of instruction in higher education according to instructional consultation criteria and suggestions of the strategies of improvement of instruction. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 15(2), 663-689.
|
15 |
Lee, Y. (2011). An ethnographic study of typology and characteristics of "successful" college teaching by best teaching awarded professors. The Korean Journal of Educational Methodology Studies, 23(1), 175-211.
DOI
|
16 |
Leslie, D. W. (2002). Resolving the dispute: Teaching is academe's core value. The Journal of Higher Education, 73(1), 49-73.
DOI
|
17 |
Light, G., Calkins, S., Luna, M., & Drane, D. (2009). Assessing the impact of a year-long faculty development program on faculty approaches to teaching. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 20(2), 168-181.
|
18 |
Loughran, J., Berry, A., & Mulhall, P. (2006). Understanding and developing science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
|
19 |
Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 95-132). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
|
20 |
Loughran, J., Mulhall, P., & Berry, A. (2004). In search of pedagogical content knowledge in science: Developing ways of articulating and documenting professional practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(4), 370-391.
DOI
|
21 |
Min, H., & Lee, H. (2011). The characteristics of good teaching based on the students' awareness: The comparative analysis of actual learning experiences between a university in Korea and oversea universities. The Journal of Yeolin Education, 19(1), 57-88.
|
22 |
Min, H., & Yun, H. (2012). The functions of instructional consulting based on video recordings in reform of university classes: Cognition of faculty members. The Journal of Yeolin Education, 20(1), 251-276.
|
23 |
Mulholland, J., & Wallace, J. (2005). Growing the tree of teacher knowledge: Ten years of learning to teach elementary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(7), 767-790.
DOI
|
24 |
Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundation of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.
DOI
|
25 |
Padilla, K., & Van Driel, J. (2011). The relationships between PCK components: The case of quantum chemistry professors. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 12(3), 367-378.
DOI
|
26 |
Park, S., & Oliver, J. S. (2008). Revisiting the conceptualisation of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): PCK as a conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals. Research in Science Education, 38(3), 261-284.
DOI
|
27 |
Robert, J., & Carlsen, W. S. (2017). Teaching and research at a large university: Case studies of science professors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(7), 937-960.
DOI
|
28 |
Shin, Y., Kim, D., & Hong, K. (2012). An analysis on instructional strategies of engineering classes. Journal of Engineering Education Research, 15(6), 9-18.
|
29 |
Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
DOI
|
30 |
Song, N., Noh, T., & Han, J. Y. (2019). An understanding of professors performance of teaching in college of science and engineering: A case study using the CHAT. Journal of Engineering Education Research, 22(1), 3-15.
|
31 |
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Technique and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
|
32 |
Sunal, D. W., Wright, E. L., & Bland, J. (2004). Reform in undergraduate science teaching for the 21st century. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
|
33 |
Wright, M. (2005). Always at odds?: Congruence in faculty beliefs about teaching at a research university. The Journal of Higher Education, 76(3), 331-353.
DOI
|
34 |
Yorke, M. (2003). Formative assessment in higher education: Moves towards theory and the enhancement of pedagogic practice. Higher Education, 45(4), 477-501.
DOI
|
35 |
Ambrose, S. A., Bridges, M. W., DiPietro, M., Lovett, M. C., & Norman, M. K. (2010). How learning works: Seven research-based principles for smart teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
|
36 |
Bain, K. (2004). What the best college teachers do. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
|
37 |
Blumberg, P. (2009). Developing learner-centered teaching: A practical guide for faculty. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
|
38 |
Brown, J. (2007). Feedback: The student perspective. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 12(1), 33-51.
DOI
|
39 |
Ahn, J. (2014). A qualitative study on characteristics of "good" college classes. The Journal of Yeolin Education, 22(1), 163-191.
|