1 |
Aufschnaite C., Erduran S., Osborne J., & Simon S. (2008). Arguing to learn and learning to argue: Case studies of how students’ argumentation relates to their scientific knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(1), 101-131.
DOI
|
2 |
Berland, L. K., Schwarz, C. V., Krist, C., Kenyon, L., Lo, A. S., & Reiser, B. J. (2016). Epistemologies in practice: Making scientific practices meaningful for students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(7), 1082-1112.
DOI
|
3 |
Cavallo, A.M.L. (1996). Meaningful learning, reasoning ability and students’ understanding and problem solving of genetics topics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 33(6), 625-656.
DOI
|
4 |
Choi J., Lee S., & Kim, H. (2014). Social interaction according to students' approaches to learning science and their levels of scientific knowledge during small-group argumentation, Biology Education, 42(4), 371-385.
DOI
|
5 |
Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287-312.
DOI
|
6 |
Duschl, R. (2008). Science education in three part harmony: Balancing conceptual, epistemic, and social learning goals. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 268-291.
DOI
|
7 |
Duschl, R. A., Schweingruber, H. A., & Shouse, A. W., Editors (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
|
8 |
Duschl, R. A., & Osborne, J. (2002). Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education. Studies in Science Education, 38(1), 39-72.
DOI
|
9 |
Kang, N., & Lee E. (2013). Argument and argumentation: A review of literature for clarification of translated words, Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 33(6), 1119-1138.
DOI
|
10 |
Kwon, J., & Kim, H. (2016). Exploring small group argumentation shown in designing an experiment: Focusing on students' epistemic goals and epistemic considerations for activities, Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 36(1), 45-61.
DOI
|
11 |
Maeng, S., Park, Y., & Kim, C. (2013). Methodological review of the research on argumentative discourse focused on analyzing collaborative construction and epistemic enactments of argumentation, Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 33(4), 840-862.
DOI
|
12 |
Park, J., & Kim, H.(2012). Theoretical considerations on analytical framework design for the interactions between participants in group argumentation on socio-scientific issues, Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 32(4), 604-624.
DOI
|
13 |
Ryu, S., & Sandoval, W. A. (2012). Improvements to elementary children’s epistemic understanding from sustained argumentation. Science Education, 96(3), 488-526.
DOI
|
14 |
Sandoval, W. A. (2005). Understanding students’ practical epistemologies and their influence on learning through inquiry. Science Education, 89(4), 634-656.
DOI
|
15 |
Sandoval, W. A. (2014). Science education’s need for a theory of epistemological development. Science Education, 98(3), 383-387.
DOI
|
16 |
Sandoval, W. A., & Cam, A. (2011). Elementary children’s judgements of the epistemic status of sources of justification. Science Education, 95(3), 383-408.
DOI
|