1 |
Adams, J., Avraamidou, L., Bayram-Jacobs, D., Boujaoude, S., Bryan, L., Christodoulou, A., ... Zembal-Saul, C. (2018). The Role of Science Educationina Changing World. Lorentz Center, Netherlands.
|
2 |
Berland, L. K., & Hammer, D. (2012). Framing for scientific argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(1), 68-94.
DOI
|
3 |
Berland, L. K., & Reiser, B. J. (2011). Classroom communities’ adaptations of the practice of scientific argumentation. Science Education, 95(2), 191-216.
DOI
|
4 |
Berland, L. K., Schwarz, C. V., Krist, C., Kenyon, L., Lo, A. S., & Reiser, B. J. (2016). Epistemologies in Practice: Making scientific practices meaningful for student. Journal of Research in Science Teacing, 53(7), 1082-1112.
DOI
|
5 |
Brown, A. L., Ash, D., Rutherford, M., Nakagawa, K., Gordon, A., & Campione, J. C. (1993). Distributed expertise in the classroom. In G. Salomon(Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations(pp. 188-228). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
|
6 |
NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For States, by States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
|
7 |
Nussbaum, E. M., & Bendixen, L. D. (2003). Approaching and avoiding arguments: The role of epistemological beliefs, need for cognition, and extraverted personality traits. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28(4), 573-595.
DOI
|
8 |
Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 994-1020.
DOI
|
9 |
Park, C. M., & Martin, S. (2018). Improving Science Teaching and Learning for New Teachers and Diverse Learners Using Participatory Action Research and Cogenerative Dialogue. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 38(2), 97-112.
DOI
|
10 |
Park, S. H., Lee, S. Y., & Kim, H. B. (2014). Exploring Middle School Students’ Metacognitive Development via Collaborative Reflection of Small-Group Argumentation in Science Classroom. The Korean Society of Biology Education, 42(1), 1-15.
|
11 |
Pattison,S.A.,Gontan,I.,Ramos‐Montañez, S., & Moreno, L. (2018). Identity negotiation within peer groups during an informal engineering education program: The central role of leadership‐oriented youth. Science Education. 102(5), 978-1006.
DOI
|
12 |
Newton, P., Driver, R., & Osborne, J. (1999). The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science. International Journal of Science Education, 21(5), 553-576.
DOI
|
13 |
Chin, C. (2007). Teacher questioning in science classrooms: Approaches that stimulate productive thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(6), 815-843.
DOI
|
14 |
Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287-312.
DOI
|
15 |
Duschl, R. (2008). Science education in three-part harmony: Balancing conceptual, epistemic, and social learning goals. Review of research in education, 32(1), 268-291.
DOI
|
16 |
Quintana, C., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Krajcik, J., Fretz, E., Duncan, R. G., et al.(2004). A Scaffolding Design Framework for Software to Support Science Inquiry. The Journal of The Learning Science, 13(3), 337-386.
DOI
|
17 |
Roth, W.-M., & Tobin, K. (2001). The Implications of Coteaching / Cogenerative Dialogue for Teacher Evaluation: Learning from Multiple Perspectives of Everyday Practice. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 15(1), 7-29.
DOI
|
18 |
Felton, M., Garcia-Mila, M., & Gilabert, S. (2009). Deliberation versus Dispute: The Impact of Argumentative Discourse Goals on Learning and Reasoning in the Science Classroom. Informal Logic, 29, 417-446.
DOI
|
19 |
Engelmann, T., Kozlov, M. D., Kolodziej, R., & Clariana, R. B. (2014). Fostering group norm development and orientation while creating awareness contents for improving net-based collaborative problem solving. Computers in Human Behavior, 37, 298-306.
DOI
|
20 |
Felton, M. (2004). The development of discourse strategies in adolescent argumentation. Cognitive Development, 19, 35-52.
DOI
|
21 |
Hammer, D., & Elby, A. (2002). On the form of a personal epistemology. In B. K. Hofer, and P. R. Pintrich(Eds.), Personal Epistemology: The Psychology of Beliefs About Knowledge and Knowing (pp. 169-190). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
|
22 |
Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P., & Erduran, S. (2008). Argumentation in science education: An overview. In S. Erduran & M. P. Jimenez-Aleixandre (Eds.), Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroombased research (pp. 3-28). Dordrecht; London: Springer.
|
23 |
Jimenez-Aleixandre, M., Rodriguez, A., & Duschl, R. (2000). "Doing the lesson" or "doing science": Argument in high school genetics. Science Education, 84(6), 757-792.
DOI
|
24 |
Sandoval. W. A., & Reiser, B. J. (2004). Explanation-driven inquiry: Integrating conceptual and epistemic scaffolds for scientific inquiry. Science Education, 88, 345-372.
DOI
|
25 |
Ryu, S., & Sandoval, W. A. (2012). Improvements to elementary children's epistemic understanding from sustained argumentation. Science Education, 96(3), 488-526.
DOI
|
26 |
Sandoval, W. A. (2005). Understanding students’ practical epistemologies and their influence on learning through inquiry. Science Education, 89(4), 634-656.
DOI
|
27 |
Sandoval, W. A., & Millwood, K. A. (2008). What can argumentation tell us about epistemology? In S. Erduran & M. P. Jimenez-Aleixandre (Eds.), Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research (pp. 71-88). Dordrecht; London: Springer.
|
28 |
Tobin, K. (2014). Using Collaborative Inquiry to Better Understand Teaching and Learning. In J. L. Bencze & S. Alsop(Eds.), Activist Science and Technology Education (Vol. 9, pp. 127-147). Dordrecht: Springer.
|
29 |
Shanahan, M. -C. (2009). Identity in science learning: Exploring the attention given to agency and structure in studies of identity. Studies in Science Education, 45(1), 43-64.
DOI
|
30 |
Simon, S., Erduran, S., & Osborne, J. (2006). Learning to teach argumentation: Research and development in the science classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 28(2-3), 235-260.
DOI
|
31 |
Tobin, K., & Roth, W.-M. (2006). Teaching to learn: Perspectives from the field. Rotterdam. The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
|
32 |
Yun, H. J., & Kim, H. B. (2018). Exploring Science High School Student’ Epistemic Goal, Epistemic Considerations and Complexity of Reasoning in Open Inquiry. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 38(4), 541-553.
DOI
|
33 |
Kuhn, D. (2005). Education for thinking. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
|
34 |
Kelly, G. J. (2005). Inquiry, activity and epistemic practice. proceedings of the Inquiry Conference on Developing a Consensus Research Agenda, Rutgers University, February. Retrieved December 2006, from http://www.ruf.rice.edu/rgrandy/NSFConSched.html.
|
35 |
Kolsto, S. D., & Ratcliffe, M.. (2008). Social aspects of argumentation. In S. Erduran & M. P. Jimenez-Aleixandre(Eds.), Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research (pp.117-136). Dordrecht; London: Springer.
|
36 |
Kuhn, D. (1993). Science as argument: implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking. Science Education, 77(3), 319-337.
DOI
|
37 |
Kwon, J. S., & Kim, H. B. (2016). Exploring Small Group Argumentation Shown in Designing an Experiment: Focusing on Students’ Epistemic Goal and Epistemic Considerations for Activities. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 36(1), 45-61.
DOI
|
38 |
Lee, C. E. & Kim, H. B. (2016). Understanding the Role of Wonderment Questions Relatedto Activation of Conceptual Resources in Scientific Model Construction: Focusing on Students’ Epistemological Framing and Positional Framing. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 36(3), 471-483.
DOI
|
39 |
Lee, S. Y., Park, S. H., & Kim, H. B. (2016). Exploring Secondary Students’ Progression in Group Norms and Argumentation Competency through Collaborative Reflection about Small Group Argumentation. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 36(6), 895-910.
DOI
|
40 |
Martin, S. (2006). Where practice and theory intersect in the chemistry classroom: using cogenerative dialogue to identify the critical point in science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1(1), 693-720.
DOI
|
41 |
Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students’ knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(1), 35-62.
DOI
|
42 |
Zeidler, D. L., Walker, K. A., Ackett, W. A., & Simmons, M. L. (2002). Tangled up in views: Beliefs in the nature of science and responses to socioscientific dilemmas. Science Education, 86(3), 343-367.
DOI
|