Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2017.37.5.859

An Investigation into the Secondary Science Teachers' Perception on Scientific Models and Modeling  

Cho, Eunjin (Seoul National University)
Kim, Chan-jong (Seoul National University)
Choe, Seung-urn (Seoul National University)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education / v.37, no.5, 2017 , pp. 859-877 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to probe secondary science teachers' perception on scientific models and modeling. A total of 50 experienced science teachers were surveyed with 10 open-ended questions about several aspects of models and modeling: definition, examples, purpose, multiplicity, changeability, design/construction, evaluation and beliefs in the use of models and modeling as a teaching tool. The analysis of the data shows the following results: 1) understanding of models and modeling held by a majority of experienced secondary science teachers was far from that of experts as they concentrated on a model's superficial, representative, and visual functions, 2) when it comes to their view toward the use of a model, a model does not remain in the stage of 'doing science' but in the stage of being a subsidiary teaching tool for the teacher's explaining and the students' understanding of scientific concepts, 3) the subjects they majored in made meaningful differences in their contextual understanding of models and modeling, 4) though most of the teachers acknowledged the importance of teaching about models and modeling, even a lot of them showed a negative position toward the opinion that they are willing to apply modeling to their classes. Implications of the results were discussed in terms of intervention in order to enhance secondary science teachers' understanding and pedagogical content knowledge of models and modeling.
Keywords
models & modeling; perception; secondary science teacher;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
2 Yager, R. E. (1991). The constructivist learning model. The Science Teacher, 58(6), 52.
3 Yip, S., & De La Rubia, T. D. (2009). Scientific modeling and simulations. The Netherlands: Springer Netherlands.
4 Spitulnik, M., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (1999). Construction of models to promote scientific understanding. In W. Feurzeig & N. Roberts (Eds.), modeling and simulation in science and mathematics education (pp. 70-94). New York: Springer-Verlag.
5 Stylianidou, F., Boohan, R., & Ogborn, J. (2005). Science teachers' transformations of the use of computer modeling in the classroom: Using research to inform training. Science Education, 89(1), 56-70.   DOI
6 Nersessian, N. J. (1992). In the theoretician's laboratory: Thought experimenting as mental modeling. In PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association (pp. 291-301). Philosophy of Science Association.
7 Nersessian, N. J. (1995). Should physicists preach what they practice?. Science & Education, 4(3), 203-226.   DOI
8 Nersessian, N. J. (2002). The cognitive basis of model-based reasoning in science. In P. Carruthers, S. Stich, & M. Siegal (Eds.), The cognitive basis of science (pp. 17-34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9 Nersessian, N. J. (2005). Interpreting scientific and engineering practices: Integrating the cognitive, social, and cultural dimensions. Scientific and Technological Thinking, 17-56.
10 Nespor, J. (1987). The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19(4), 317-328.   DOI
11 Niiniluoto, I. (2002). Critical scientific realism. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
12 Ogborn, J., Boohan, R., Mellar, H., & Bliss, J. (1994). Learning with artificial worlds: Computer based modelling in the curriculum. Learning With Artificial Worlds: Computer Based Modelling in the Curriculum. London: The Falmer Press.
13 Oh, P. S. (2009). Preservice elementary teachers' perceptions on models used in science and science education. Elementary Science Education, 28(4), 450-466.
14 Oh, P. S., & Oh, S. J. (2011). What teachers of science need to know about models: An overview. International Journal of Science Education, 33(8), 1109-1130.   DOI
15 Upmeier zu Belzen, A., & Kruger, D. (2010). Model competence in bioology teaching. Zeitschrift fur Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 16, 41-57.
16 Tomasi, J. (1988). Models and modeling in theoretical chemistry. Journal of Molecular Structure: THEOCHEM, 179(1), 273-292.   DOI
17 Tomasi, J. (1999). Towards 'chemical congruence'of the models in theoretical chemistry. International Journal for Philosophy of Chemistry, 5(2), 79-115.
18 Treagust, D. F., Chittleborough, G., & Mamiala, T. L. (2002). Students' understanding of the role of scientific models in learning science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(4), 357-368.   DOI
19 Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers and powerful ideas. New York, NY: Basic Books.
20 Pajares, M. F.(1992). Teachers' beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307-332.   DOI
21 Van Driel, J. H., & Verloop, N. (2002). Experienced teachers' knowledge of teaching and learning of models and modelling in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 24(12), 1255-1272.   DOI
22 Van Der Valk, T., Van Driel, J. H., & De Vos, W. (2007). Common characteristics of models in present-day scientific practice. Research in Science Education, 37(4), 469-488.   DOI
23 Van Driel, J. H., & Verloop, N. (1998). Teachers' knowledge about the nature of models and modelling in science. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Education, San Diego.
24 Van Driel, J. H., & Verloop, N. (1999). Teachers' knowledge of models and modeling in science. International Journal of Science Education, 21(11), 1141-1154.   DOI
25 Van Driel, J. H., Verloop, N., & De Vos, W. (1998). Developing science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of research in Science Teaching, 35(6), 673-695.   DOI
26 Verloop, N. (1992). Practical knowledge of teachers: A blind spot of educational theory. Pedagogische Studien, 69, 410-423.
27 Pluta, W. J., Chinn, C. A., & Duncan, R. G. (2011). Learners' epistemic criteria for good scientific models. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(5), 486-511.   DOI
28 Passmore, C., & Stewart, J. (2002). A modeling approach to teaching evolutionary biology in high schools. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(3), 185-204.   DOI
29 Penner, D. E., Giles, N. D., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (1997). Building functional models: Designing an elbow. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(2), 125-143.   DOI
30 Prather, J. P. (1992). Educational implications of the Khunian concept of normal and revolutionary science. History and Philosophy of Science in Science Education, 2, 299-312.
31 Raghavan, K., & Glaser, R. (1995). Model-based analysis and reasoning in science: the MARS curriculum. Science Education, 79(1), 37-61.   DOI
32 Rea-Ramirez, M. A., Clement, J., & Nunez-Oviedo, M. C. (2008). An instructional model derived from model construction and criticism theory. In Model based learning and instruction in science (pp. 23-43). The Netherlands: Springer Netherlands.
33 Resnick, M. (1999). Decentralized modeling and decentralized thinking. In W. Feurzeig & N. Roberts (Eds.), Modeling and simulation in science and mathematics education (pp. 114-137). New York: Springer-Verlag.
34 Schwarz, C. V. (1998). Developing students' understanding of scientific modeling. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
35 White, B. & Frederiksen, J. R. (1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction, 16(1), 3-118.   DOI
36 Windschitl, M., & Thompson, J. (2006). Transcending simple forms of school science investigation: The impact of preservice instruction on teachers' understanding of model-based inquiry. American Educational Research Journal, 43(4), 783-835.   DOI
37 Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., & Braaten, M. (2008). Beyond the scientific method: Model-based inquiry as a new paradigm of preference for school science investigations. Science Education, 92(5), 941-967.   DOI
38 Richards, J., Barowy, W., & Levin, D. (1992). Computer simulations in the science classroom. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 1(1), 67-79.   DOI
39 Rosenblueth, A., & Wiener, N. (1945). The role of models in science. Philosophy of science, 12(4), 316-321.   DOI
40 Schwarz, C. V., & Gwekwerere, Y. N. (2007). Using a guided inquiry and modeling instructional framework (EIMA) to support preservice K-8 science teaching. Science Education, 91, 158-186.   DOI
41 Schwarz, C. V., & White, B. Y. (1999). What do seventh grade students understand about scientific modeling from a model-oriented physics curriculum. National Association for Research in Science Teaching, March, 28-31.
42 Schwarz, C. V., & White, B. Y. (2005). Metamodeling knowledge: Developing students' understanding of scientific modeling. Cognition and Instruction, 23(2), 165-205.   DOI
43 Barab, S. A., Hay, K. E., Barnett, M., & Keating, T. (2000). Virtual solar system project: Building understanding through model building. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(7), 719-756.   DOI
44 Al-Balushi, S. M. (2011). Students' evaluation of the credibility of scientific models that represent natural entities and phenomena. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(3), 571-601.   DOI
45 American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for scientific literacy. Washington, D.C.: AAAS.
46 Bailer-Jones, D. M. (2002). Scientists' thoughts on scientific models. Perspectives on Science, 10(3), 275-301.   DOI
47 Boulter, C. J., & Buckley, B. C. (2000). Constructing a typology of models for science education. In Developing models in science education (pp. 41-57). The Netherlands: Springer Netherlands.
48 Cartier, J., Rudolph, J., & Stewart, J. (2001). The nature and structure of scientific models. National Center for Improving Student Learning and Achievement in Mathematics and Science.
49 White, B. (1993). Thinker Tools: Causal models, conceptual change, and science education. Cognition and Instruction, 10(1), 1-100.   DOI
50 Smith, C. L., Maclin, D. Houghton, C., & Hennessey, M. G. (2000). Sixth-grade students' epistemologies of science: The impact of school science experiences on epistemological development. Cognition and Instruction, 18(3), 349-422.   DOI
51 Somerville, R. C., & Hassol, S. J. (2011). The science of climate change. Physics Today, 64(10), 48.   DOI
52 Songer, N. B., & Linn, M. C. (1991). How do students' views of science influence knowledge integration. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(9), 761-784.   DOI
53 Akerson, V. L., Townsend, J. S., Donnelly, L. A., Hanson, D. L., Tira, P., & White, O. (2009). Scientific modeling for inquiring teachers network (SMIT'N): The influence on elementary teachers' views of nature of science, inquiry, and modeling. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20(1), 21-40.   DOI
54 Cess-Newsome, J. (1999). Secondary teachers' knowledge and beliefs about subject matter and their impact on instruction. In Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 51-94). The Netherlands: Springer Netherlands.
55 Coll, R. K. (2006). The role of models, mental models and analogies in chemistry teaching. In Metaphor and analogy in science education (pp. 65-77). The Netherlands: Springer Netherlands.
56 Crawford, B. A., & Cullin, M. J. (2004). Supporting prospective teachers' conceptions of modelling in science. International Journal of science Education, 26(11), 1379-1401.   DOI
57 Crawford, B. A,, & Cullin, M. J. (2005). Dynamic assessments of preservice teachers' knowledge of models and modelling. In Research and the quality of science education (pp. 309-323). The Netherlands: Springer Netherlands.
58 Acher, A., Arca, M., & Sanmarti, N. (2007). Modeling as a teaching learning process for understanding materials: A case study in primary education. Science Education, 91(3), 398-418.   DOI
59 Danusso, L., Testa, I., & Vicentini, M. (2010). Improving prospective teachers' knowledge about scientific models and modelling: Design and evaluation of a teacher education intervention. International Journal of Science Education, 32(7), 871-905.   DOI
60 Darden, L. (1991). Theory change in science: Strategies from Mendelian genetics. New York: Oxford University Press.
61 Davis, E. (2011). Design approaches to support pre-service teachers in scientific modeling. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22(1), 1-21.   DOI
62 Gilbert, J. K., & Boulter, C. J. (1993). Models and modeling in science education. Hatfield, UK: Association of Science Education.
63 Fernandez-Balboa, J. M., & Stiehl, J. (1995). The generic nature of pedagogical content knowledge among college professors. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(3), 293-306.   DOI
64 Giere, R. N. (1988). Explaining science: A cognitive approach. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
65 Giere, R. N. (1999). Science without laws. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
66 Giere, R. N., Bickle, J., & Mauldin, R. F. (2006). Understanding Scientific reasoning. Toronto: Thomson Wadsworth.
67 Gilbert, J. K. (2007). Visualization: An emergent field of practice and enquiry in science education. Visualization: Theory and Practice in Science Education: Theory and Practice in Science Education, 3, 1.
68 Gilbert, J. K., & Boulter, C. J. (1998). Learning science through models and modelling. International Handbook of Science Education, 2, 53-66.
69 Gilbert, S. W. (1991). Model building and a definition of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(1), 73-79.   DOI
70 Duschl, R. A., & Grandy, R. E. (2008). Reconsidering the character and role of inquiry in school science: Framing the debates. Teaching Scientific Inquiry: Recommendations for Research and Implementation, 1-37.
71 Gilbert, S. W., & Ireton, S. W. (2003). Understanding Models in Earth & Space Science. NSTA press.
72 Gobert, J., & Discenna, J. (1997, April). The relationship between students' epistemologies and model-based reasoning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
73 Halloun, I. A. (2007). Mediated modeling in science education. Science & Education, 16(7-8), 653-697.   DOI
74 Gobert, J. D., O'Dwyer, L., Horwitz, P., Buckley, B. C., Levy, S. T., & Wilensky, U. (2011). Examining the relationship between students' understanding of the nature of models and conceptual learning in biology, physics, and chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 33(5), 653-684.   DOI
75 Grosslight, L., Unger, C., Jay, E., & Smith, C. L. (1991). Understanding models and their use in science: Conceptions of middle and high school students and experts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(9), 799-822.   DOI
76 Grunkorn, J., Hansch, J., zu Belzen, A. U., & Kruger, D. (2012). Determination of students' model competence using open-ended and hands-on tasks. Nature of Science, History, Philosophy, Sociology of Science, 39.
77 Halloun, I. A., & Hesenes, D. (1987). Modeling instuctory physics. Cognition and Instruction, 12(2), 151-183.   DOI
78 Hammer, D. (1994). Epistemological Beliefs in Introductory Physics. Cognition and Instruction, 12(2), 151-183.   DOI
79 Harrison, A. G., & Treagust, D. F. (2000). A typology of school science models. International Journal of Science Education, 22(9), 1011-1026.   DOI
80 Henze, I., Van Driel, J. H., & Verloop, N. (2007). The change of science teachers' personal knowledge about teaching models and modelling in the context of science education reform. International Journal of Science Education, 29(15), 1819-1846.   DOI
81 Henze, I., Van Driel, J. H., & Verloop, N. (2008). Development of experienced science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge of models of the solar system and the universe. International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1321-1342.   DOI
82 Justi, R. S., & Gilbert, J. K. (2003). Models and modelling in chemical education. In Chemical education: Towards research-based practice (pp. 47-68). The Netherlands: Springer Netherlands.
83 Hodson, D. (1998). Is this really what scientists do? Seeking a more authentic science in and beyond the school laboratory. Practical Work in School Science: Which Way Now, 93-108.
84 Justi, R. S., & Gilbert, J. K. (2002a). Modelling, teachers' views on the nature of modelling, and implications for the education of modellers. International Journal of Science Education, 24(4), 369-387.   DOI
85 Justi, R. S., & Gilbert, J. K. (2002b). Science teachers' knowledge about and attitudes towards the use of models and modelling in learning science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(12), 1273-1292.   DOI
86 Justi, R. S., & Van Driel, J. H. (2005). The development of science teachers' Knowledge on models and modelling: promoting, characterizing, and understanding the process. International Journal of Science Education, 27(5), 549-573.   DOI
87 Kang, N. H. (2017). Korean Teachers' Conceptions of Models and Modeling in Science and Science Teaching. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 37(1), 143-154.
88 Kim, Y. C. (2006). Qqualitative Research Methodology. Seoul: Moonumsa.
89 Kitcher, P. (1993). The advancement of science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
90 Krell, M., Upmeier zu Belzen, A., & Kruger, D. (2012). Assessment of students' concepts of models and modeling: Empirical evaluation of a model of model competence. In E-book proceedings of the ESERA 2011 conference (pp. 68-74).
91 Longino, H. (1990). Science as social knowledge: Values and objectivity in scientific inquiry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
92 Krell, M., Reinisch, B., & Kruger, D. (2014). Analyzing students' understanding of models and modeling referring to the disciplines biology, chemistry, and physics. Research in Science Education, 45(3), 367-393.   DOI
93 Krell, M., Upmeier zu Belzen, A., & Kruger, D. (2014). Context-specificities in students' understanding of models and modelling: an issue of critical importance for both assessment and teaching. In E-Book proceedings of the ESERA 2013 conference. Science education research for evidence-based teaching and coherence in learning. Part (Vol. 6).
94 Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 331-359.   DOI
95 Leatherdale, W. H. (1974). The role of analogy, model, and metaphor in science. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
96 Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2000). Modeling in mathematics and science(pp. 101-159). R. Glaser (Ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
97 Loucks-Horsley, S., Stiles, K. E., Mundry, S., Love, N., & Hewson, P. W. (2009). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. London: Corwin Press.
98 Maia, P. F., & Justi, R. (2009). Learning of chemical equilibrium through modelling-based teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 31(5), 603-630.   DOI
99 Mandinach, E., & Cline, H. (1993). Systems, science and schools. System Dynamics Review, 9(2), 195-206.   DOI
100 Mahr, B. (2009). Information science and the logic of models. Software and Systems Modeling, 8(3), 365-383.   DOI