Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2017.37.1.0215

International Comparison Study on Essential Concepts of Science Curriculum: Focus on the United States, Canada, Australia and England  

Kim, Jihyeon (Seoul National University)
Chung, Are Jun (Seoul National University)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education / v.37, no.1, 2017 , pp. 215-223 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study aims to find an effective way to present essential science concepts in national science curriculum through international comparisons. Next Generation Science Standard (US), Ontario Science Curriculum (Canada), Australia Science Curriculum, and British/English Science Curriculum were selected for comparison. In science curriculum documents, these countries used terms such as 'Key ideas,' 'Big ideas,' 'Key concepts,' 'Disciplinary core ideas.' and 'Fundamental concepts' to present essential concepts of science. This study reviewed the characteristics of the meaning, the status, and the role of essential concepts country by country. The result shows essential concepts have been used with different meanings and statutes in each case. Furthermore, various roles were performed through essential concepts in order to organize their science curriculum. From these foreign nation's cases, this study proposes several ways to present essential science concepts based on results. First, interdisciplinary integrated concepts were needed to organize an integrated science curriculum. In science curriculum documents of the United States, Canada, Australia and England, two types of terms were used in order to structuralize an integrated science curriculum. Second, essential concepts should include concepts related with function and value as well as scientific knowledge. Third, essential concepts need to be presented in such a way as to show specific contexts. Therefore, selecting appropriate contents and structure are needed to be able to improve the way to present essential concepts in Korea's educational environment.
Keywords
science curriculum; essential concepts; Next Generation Science Standard(NGSS); Ontario science curriculum; Australia science curriculum; England science curriculum;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 5  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 NGSS Lead States(2013). Next generation science standards for states, by states. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.
2 Next Generation Science Standards. (2014, December 14). NGSS Executive Summary. Retrieved from http://www.nextgenscience.org/sites/ngss/files/Final%20Release%20N GSS%20Front%20Matter%20-%206.17.13%20Update_0.pdf
3 Ontario Ministry of Education(2007). The Ontario Curriculum Grade 1-8, Science and Technology. Retrieved November 6, 2015 from https://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/curriculum/elementary/scientec18currb.pdf
4 Ontario Ministry of Education(2008a). The Ontario Curriculum : Science Grades 9 and 10. Retrieved November 6, 2015 from http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/curriculum/secondary/science910_2008.pdf
5 Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority(2015). The Australian Curriculum Science. Retrieved October 24, 2015, from http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/download/f10
6 Paik, N-J., Ohn, J-D. (2015). Examination of How General Competency is Reflected and Presented in the Australian National Curriculum. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 33(2), 99-128.   DOI
7 Ontario Ministry of Education(2008b). The Ontario Curriculum : Science Grades 11 and 12. Retrieved November 6, 2015 from http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/curriculum/secondary/2009science11_
8 Paik, N.-J. (2014a). Review of statements of achievement standards in subject curriculum : Focusing on the national science curriculum of Republic of Korea and the U. S.. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32(2), 101-131.   DOI
9 Paik, N-J. (2014b). Review of subject-specific competency based standards : focusing on social studies curriculum of Australia, Canada, Singapore. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32(4), 163-194.
10 So, K-H. (2015). Things intended and realized in the 2013 revision of the national curriculum in England: significance and limitation. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 33(3), 199-220.   DOI
11 Department for Education(2014). The national curriculum in England Framework document. London: Department for education.
12 Cho, C-K. (2006). A Continuous Concern of Citizenship Education in British Geography Education. Journal of the Korean Association of Regional Geographers, 12(3), 421-435.
13 Choi, J-H. (2008). A study on fixing and categorizing of curriculum terms for planning curriculum of literary education in secondary school(2) - curriculum terms in secondary school curriculum of literary education in USA and Canada. Journal of the Korean Society of Literary Education, 21, 199-294.
14 Choi, J., & Paik, S. (2013). A Comparative Analysis of Achievement Standards of the 2007 & 2009 Revised Elementary Science Curriculum with Next Generation Science Standards in US based on Bloom's Revised Taxonomy. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(2), 277-288.   DOI
15 Kim, J.-S., Park, S.-K., Choi, J., & Lee, H. (2013). International comparative studies on the sequence and integrity of elementary and secondary school curricula (Research report RRC 2013-3). Seoul: Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation.
16 So, K-H., Jang, J-K., Lee, S-Y. (2011). Review on the Australian Curriculum: Process of the Development and Features. Korean Journal of Comparative Education, 21(2), 51-73.
17 Yun, E., & Park, Y. (2014). Relationship of using science terminology between science curriculum and middle school science textbooks in the 2009 national curriculum. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 34(7), 667-675.   DOI
18 Given, L. M. (Ed.). (2008). The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. Sage Publications.
19 Kim, D.-H., & Kim, H.-N. (2012). International comparison of contents about particle concept in national science curricula. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 31(2), 164-176.
20 Kim, S. & Choi, T. (2007). Research methodology in education. Seoul: Hakjisa.
21 Kwak, Y., Son, J,. Kim, M-Y,. & Ku, J. (2014). Research on Ways to Improve Science Curriculum Focused on Key Competencies and Creative Fusion Education. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 34(3), 321-330.   DOI
22 Ministry of Education (MOE). (2015a). 2015 revised curriculum -Overview-. Seoul: Ministry of Education.
23 Lee, Y., Yoon, H., Song, J-Y., & Bang, D. (2014). Analysis of science educational contents of Singapore, Canada and US focused on the integrated concepts., Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 34(1), 21-32.   DOI
24 Lee, H., & Yeo, C,. (2015). International comparison study on the articulation of the science curriculum: Focus on the concept of photosynthesis., Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(5), 805-815.   DOI
25 Ministry of Education (MOE). (2014). Main points of the general guidelines for 2015 liberal art and natural science integrated curriculum. Ministry of Education. Retrived from http://ncic.re.kr/mobile.revise.board.view.do
26 Ministry of Education (MOE). (2015b). 2015 revised curriculum -Science-. Seoul: Ministry of Education.
27 Marsh, C. (1992). Key Concept for Understanding Curriculum Development. Paris: UNESCO.