1 |
Atwood, R. K., & Atwood, V. A. (1996). Preservice elementary teachers' conceptions of the causes of seasons. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(5), 553-563.
DOI
|
2 |
Berland, L. K., Schwarz, C. V., Krist, C., Kenyon, L., Lo, A. S., & Reiser, B. J. (in press). Epistemologies in practice: Making scientific practices meaningful for students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. Advance online publication doi: 10.1002/tea.21257.
DOI
|
3 |
Berliner, D. C. (2002). Educational research: The hardest science of all. Educational Researcher, 31(8), 18-20.
DOI
|
4 |
Brewer, W. F., & Samarapungavan, A. (1991). Children's theories vs. scientific theories: Differences in reasoning or differences in knowledge. In R. R. Hoffman & D. S. Palermo (Eds.), Cognition and the symbolic processes: Applied and ecological perspectives (pp. 209-232). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
|
5 |
Chae, D.-H. (1992). Students' naïve theories about change in seasons. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 13(3), 283-289.
|
6 |
Chinn, C. A., Buckland, L. A., & Samarapungavan, A. (2011). Expanding the dimensions of epistemic cognition: Arguments from philosophy and psychology. Educational Psychologist, 46(3), 141-167.
DOI
|
7 |
Clement, J., Brown, D., & Zietsman, A. (1989). Not all preconceptions are misconceptions: Finding anchoring conceptions for grounding instruction on students' intuitions. International Journal of Science Education, 11(5), 554-565.
DOI
|
8 |
diSessa, A. A. (1993). Toward an epistemology of physics. Cognition and Instruction, 10(2&3), 105-225.
DOI
|
9 |
Hodson, D. (1996). Laboratory work as scientific method: Three decades of confusion and distortion. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 28(2), 115-135.
DOI
|
10 |
Hofer, B. K. (2001). Personal epistemology research: Implications for learning and teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology Review, 13(4), 353-383.
DOI
|
11 |
Kikas, E. (1998). The impact of teaching on students' definitions and explanations of astronomical phenomena. Learning and Instruction, 8(5), 439-454.
DOI
|
12 |
Kitchener, R. F. (2002). Folk epistemology: An introduction. New Ideas in Psychology, 20, 89-105.
DOI
|
13 |
Kittleson, J. M. (2012). Epistemological beliefs of third-grade students in an investigation-rich classroom. Science Education, 95, 1026-1048.
|
14 |
Lidar, M., Lundqvist, E., & ostman, L. (2006). Teaching and learning in the science classroom: The interplay between teachers' epistemological moves and students' practical epistemology. Science Education, 90, 148-163.
DOI
|
15 |
Lee, H. (2007). A research on the necessities and methods of criticism of classroom instruction. Anthropology of Education, 10(1), 155-185.
DOI
|
16 |
Lee, S.-K. (2015). Conceptual change in learning science. Seoul: SNU press.
|
17 |
Levin, D. M., Hammer, D., & Coffey, J. E. (2009). Novice teachers' attention to student thinking. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(2), 142-154.
DOI
|
18 |
Louca, L., Elby, A., Hammer, D., & Kagey, T. (2004). Epistemological resources: Applying a new epistemological framework to science instruction. Educational Psychologist, 39(1), 57-68.
DOI
|
19 |
Rosenberg, S., Hammer, D., & Phelan, J. (2008). Multiple epistemological coherences in an eighth-grade discussion of the rock cycle. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(2). 261-292.
DOI
|
20 |
Rosebery, A. S., Ogonowski, M., DiSchino, M., & Warren, B. (2010). "The coat traps all your body heat":Heterogeneity as fundamental to learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19, 322-357.
DOI
|
21 |
Sandoval, W. A., & Millwood, K. A. (2008). What can argumentation tell us about epistemology. In S. Erduran & M. P. Jimenez-Aleixandre (Eds.), Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research (pp. 71-88). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
|
22 |
Sandoval, W. A., & Morrison, K. (2003). High school students' ideas about theories and theory change after a biological inquiry unit. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(4), 369-392.
DOI
|
23 |
Smith, J. P., diSessa, A. A., & Roschelle, J. (1993/1994). Misconceptions reconsidered: A constructivist analysis of knowledge in transition. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(2), 115-163.
DOI
|
24 |
Suh, K.-W. (2013). A lesson, how we see: Looking for children's eyes. Paju: Kyoyookbook.
|
25 |
Songer, N. B., Lee, H.-S., & McDonald, S. (2003). Research towards an expanded understanding of inquiry science beyond one idealized standard. Science Education, 87, 490-516.
DOI
|
26 |
Tang, X., Coffey, J., Elby, A., Levin, D. (2010). The scientific method and scientific inquiry: Tensions in teaching and learning. Science Education, 94, 29-47.
|
27 |
The Ministry of Education (2011). Science 6-1: Teacher guide. Seoul: Author.
|
28 |
Elby, A,. & Hammer, D. (2010). Epistemological resources and framing: A cognitive framework for helping teachers interpret and respond to their students' epistemologies. In L. D. Bendixen & F. C. Feucht (Eds.), Personal epistemology in the classroom: Theory, research, and implications for practice (pp. 409-434). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
|
29 |
diSessa, A. A. (2013). A bird's-eye view of the "pieces"vs. "coherence" controversy (from the "pieces"side of the fence). In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (2nd ed., pp. 31-48). New York: Routledge.
|
30 |
Driver, R., & Oldham, V. (1986). A constructivist approach to curriculum development in science. Studies in Science Education, 13, 105-122.
DOI
|
31 |
Ford, M. (2008). 'Grasp of practice' as a reasoning resource for inquiry and nature of science understanding. Science & Education, 17, 147-177.
DOI
|
32 |
Ford, M. (2012). A dialogic account of sense-making in scientific argumentation and reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 30(3), 207-245.
DOI
|
33 |
Hammer, D. (1996). More than misconceptions: Multiple perspectives on student knowledge and reasoning, and an appropriate role for education research. American Journal of Physics, 64(10), 1316-1325.
DOI
|
34 |
Hammer, D. (2000). Student resources for learning introductory physics. Physics Education Research, American Journal of Physics, 68(Suppl. 7), S52-S59.
|
35 |
Hammer, D. (2004a). The variability of student reasoning, lecture 1: Case studies of children's inquiries. In E. Redish & M. Vicentini (Eds.), Proceedings of the Enrico Fermi Summer School, Course CLVI (pp. 279-299). Bologna: Italian Physical Society.
|
36 |
Hammer, D., Elby, A., Scherr, R. E., & Redish, E. F. (2005). Resources, framing, and transfer. In J. Mestre (Ed.), Transfer of learning from a modern multidisciplinary perspective (pp. 89-120). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
|
37 |
Hammer, D. (2004b). The variability of student reasoning, lecture 2: Transitions. In E. Redish & M. Vicentini (Eds.), Proceedings of the Enrico Fermi Summer School, Course CLVI (pp. 301-319). Bologna: Italian Physical Society.
|
38 |
Hammer, D. (2004c). The variability of student reasoning, lecture 3: Manifold cognitive resources. In E. Redish & M. Vicentini (Eds.), Proceedings of the Enrico Fermi Summer School, Course CLVI (pp. 321-340). Bologna: Italian Physical Society.
|
39 |
Hammer, D., & Elby, A. (2002). On the form of a personal epistemology. In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 169-190). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
|
40 |
Hammer, D., Goldberg, F., & Fargason, S. (2012). Responsive teaching and the beginnings of energy in a third grade classroom. Review of Science, Mathematics and ICT Education, 6(1), 51-72.
|
41 |
Hammer, D., Russ, R., Mikeska, J., & Scherr, R. (2008). Identifying inquiry and conceptualizing students' abilities. In R. A. Duschl & R. E. Grandy (Eds.), Teaching scientific inquiry: Recommendations for research and implementation (pp. 138-156). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
|
42 |
Hammer, D., & Sikorski, T.-R. (2015). Implications of complexity for research on learning progressions. Science Education, 99(3), 424-431.
DOI
|
43 |
Hewson, P. W., & Hewson, M. G. A. (1984). The role of conceptual conflict in conceptual change and the design of science instruction. Instructional Science, 13, 1-13.
DOI
|
44 |
Millar, R., & Driver, R. (1987). Beyond processes. Studies in Science Education, 14, 33-62.
DOI
|
45 |
Manz, E. (2015). Resistance and the development of scientific practice: Designing the mangle into science instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 33(2), 89-124.
DOI
|
46 |
Maskiewicz, A. C., & Winters, V. A. (2012). Understanding the co-construction of inquiry practices: A case study of a responsive teaching environment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(4), 429-464.
DOI
|
47 |
May, D. B., Hammer, D., & Roy, P. (2006). Children's analogical reasoning in a third-grade science discussion. Science Education, 90, 316-330.
DOI
|
48 |
Minstrell, J. (1982). Explaining the 'at rest' condition of an object. Physics Teacher, 20, 10-20.
DOI
|
49 |
Oh, P. S. (2013). Secondary science teachers' thoughts on 'good' science teaching. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 33(2), 405-424.
DOI
|
50 |
Oh, P. S. (2014). Characteristics of teacher learning and changes in teachers' epistemic beliefs within a learning community of elementary science teachers. Elementary Science Education, 33(4), 683-699.
DOI
|
51 |
Ogan-Bekiroglu, F., & Akkoc, H. (2009). Preservice teachers' instructional beliefs and examination of consistency between beliefs and practices. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7, 1173-1199.
DOI
|
52 |
Parnafes, O. (2012). Developing explanations and developing understanding: Students explains the phases of the moon using visual representations. Cognition and Instruction, 30(4), 359-403.
DOI
|
53 |
Warren, B., Ballenger, C., Ogonowski, M., Rosebery, A. S., & Hudicourt-Barnes, J. (2001). Rethinking diversity in learning science: The logic of everyday sense-making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(5), 529-552.
DOI
|
54 |
Tobin, K., & McRobbie, C. (1997). Beliefs about the nature of science and the enacted science curriculum. Science & Education, 6, 355-371.
DOI
|