1 |
Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N. G. (1998). The nature of science and instructional practice: making the unnatural. Science Education, 82, 417-436.
DOI
|
2 |
Bae, J. H., Kim, J. S., & Yun, B. H. (2005). The effects of that inquiry activity through plants influences scientific process skills, science attitude and observation skills for elementary students. Journal of Research in Science Education, 30, 37-68.
|
3 |
Baek, N. Y., & Lee, H. S. (2003). Design and application of a web-based instruction to enhance science process skill. The Bulletin of Science Education, 15(2), 157-188.
|
4 |
Bodzin, A. M., & Fu, Q. (2014). The effectiveness of the geospatial curriculum approach on urban middle-level students' climate change understandings. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23, 575-590.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
5 |
Bonk, C. J., & Dennen, V. (1999). Teaching on the web: with a little help from my pedagogical friends. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 11(1), 3-28.
DOI
|
6 |
Choi, W., & Sung, E. M. (2004). An instructional model of problem-based inquiry learning with internet. The Journal of Korea Society for Educational Technology, 20(4), 147-183.
|
7 |
Clark, D. B., & Linn, M. C. (2003). Scaffolding knowledge integration through curricular depth. Journal of Learning Sciences, 12(4), 451-494.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
8 |
Collins, A. (1997). National science education standards: looking backward and forward. The Elementary School Journal, 97(4), 299-313.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
9 |
DeBoer, G. E. (1991). A history of ideas in science education. New York: Teachers College Press.
|
10 |
DeBoer, G. E., Quellmalz, E. S., Davenport, J. L., Timms, M. J., Herrmann-Abell, C. F., Buckley, B. C., Jordan, K. A., Huang, C. W., & Flanagan, J. C. (2014). Comparing three online testing modalities: using static, active, and interactive online testing modalities to assess middle school students' understanding of fundamental ideas and use of inquiry skills related to ecosystems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(4), 523-554.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
11 |
Jang, S. M., & Suh, S. S. (2004). The effects of scholastic achievement and inquiry ability enhancement of web resources based inquiry learning. Journal of research in science education, 27, 31-54.
|
12 |
Ebenezer, J., Kaya, O. N., & Ebenezer, D. L. (2011). Engaging students in environmental research projects: perceptions of fluency with innovative technologies and levels of scientific inquiry abilities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(1), 94-116.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
13 |
Glass, G. V., McGaw, B., Smith, & M. L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
|
14 |
Gwak, H. J. (2015). The effect of learner's learning style and scaffolding types on academic achievement and science process skills in web-based inquiry learning environment. (Master's thesis, Korea National University of Education, Chung-Buk, Rep. of Korea).
|
15 |
Jang, S. Y., & Lee, S. B. (2012). The effects of self-regulated learning level and reflection journal type on academic achievement in online science inquiry. Journal of Korea Society for Educational Technology, 28(3), 531-557.
|
16 |
Jong, T. D., Weinberger, A., Gorault, I., Kluge, A., Lazonder, A. W., & Pedaste, M. (2012). Using scenarios to design complex technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60(5), 883-901.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
17 |
Jung, E. S., & Ahn, D. H. (2009). Effects of web-based science program and self-regulated learning on upper elementary students' scientific self-efficacy and science performance. The Journal of Elementary Education, 22(2), 281-305.
|
18 |
Kang, M. H., Kim, J. Y., Yoo, E. J., & Park, Y. (2012). Investigating the wise(web-based inquiry science environment) effects in elementary science classes using multi-group structural analysis. The Korean Journal of Educational Methodology Studies, 24(1), 185-207.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
19 |
Kang, M. H., Lim, Y. J., Kim, M. J., & Kim, J. Y. (2009). The difference between two scaffolding types in academic achievement and science inquiry skills for wise-based science education. The Korean Journal of Educational Methodology Studies, 21(1), 1-19.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
20 |
Kang, M. H., Kim, J. Y., Yoo, E. J., Park, Y., & Cho, S. K. (2012). Investigating the structural relationship of self-regulated learning skills, cognitive presence, science process skills, and science learning achievement when using wise. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction, 16(2), 481-498.
DOI
|
21 |
Kang, M. H., Park, H. S., Yoo, E. J., & Cho, S. K. (2011). Analyzing the effectiveness of wise(web-based inquiry science environment) for elementary science classes. The Journal of Educational Information and Media, 17(4), 531-552.
|
22 |
Kim, H. H., Oh, D. I., & Heo, G. (2014). A Study on the research trends of smart learning. Journal of Fisheries and Marine Sciences Education, 26(1), 156-165.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
23 |
Kim, M. C., Hannafin, M. J., & Bryan, L. A. (2007). Technology-enhanced inquiry tools in science education: an emerging pedagogical framework for classroom practice. Science Education, 91(6), 1010-1030.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
24 |
Kim, S. J., & Moon, G. S. (2006). Development of a web community-based inquiry learning system for elementary science education utilizing blended-learning strategy. Journal of Korea Association of Information Education, 10(2), 171-182.
|
25 |
Kulo, V., & Bodzin, A. (2013). The impact of a geospatial technologysupported energy curriculum on middle school students' science achievement. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22, 24-36.
|
26 |
Lee, B. W., Son, J. W., & Jeong, H. C. (2006). The development of an online scientific inquiry learning system. The Korean Society of Elementary Science Education, 25(3), 271-280.
|
27 |
Linn, M. C., & Hsi, S. (2000). Computers, teachers, peers: science learning partners. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
|
28 |
Levy, D. (2013). How dynamic visualization technology can support molecular reasoning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22, 702-717.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
29 |
Li, Q., Moorman, L., & Dyjur, P. (2010). Inquiry-based learning and e-mentoring via video conference a study of mathematics and science learning of Canadian rural students. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58, 729-753.
DOI
|
30 |
Lim, B. (2001). Guidelines for designing inquiry-based learning on the web: online professional development of educators. Unpublished discussion, The Indiana State University, Indiana.
|
31 |
Malopinsky, L., Kirkley, J., Stein, R., & Duffy, T. (2000). An instructional design model for online problem based learning (pbl) environments : the learning to teach with technology studio. Document Resume, 244.
|
32 |
Ministry of Education and Science Technology (2008). 2007 commentary on revised curriculum of the elementary school education IV. Seoul: MiraeN.
|
33 |
National Research Council (2000). National science education standards. Washington, D.C: National Academy Press.
|
34 |
Park, H. S., & Cho, H. H. (2003). Analyses of scientific inquiry in science 8. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 23(3), 239-245.
|
35 |
Park, J. Y., & Kim, H. B. (2007). Research trend in science education from 1973 to 2006 : an analysis of publication in two kinds of korean journals. Journal of Korean Biology Education, 34(5), 551-565.
|
36 |
Shim, K. C., Kim, H. S., & Chung, J. I. (2005). The effect of web-based learning by studying the motion of the moon. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 25(4), 450-464.
|
37 |
Park, S. Y., Kang, M. J., & Kim, S. D. (2001). The development of web based instruction program on oceanography unit and the analysis of its effects in earth science class. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 21(2), 264-278.
|
38 |
Raes, A., Schellens, T., Wever, B. D., & Vanderhoven, E. (2012). Scaffolding information problem solving in web-based collaborative inquiry learning. Computers & Education, 59, 82-94.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
39 |
Ryoo, W. Y., & Bae, M. E. (2007). The effects of type of questions on knowledge sharing process and shared mental model in the web-based inquiry learning. The Journal of Educational Information and Media, 13(1), 249-278.
|
40 |
Singer, S., Hilton, M., & Schweingruber, H. (2005). America's lab report: investigations in high school science. Washington, D.C: The National Academies Press.
|
41 |
Suh, J. K. (2005). An analysis on recent trends to analyze the effectiveness of web-based instruction(wbi) in the domain of science. (Master's thesis, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Rep. of Korea).
|
42 |
Sun, D., & Looi, C. K. (2013). Designing a web-based science learning environment for model-based collaborative inquiry. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22, 73-89.
DOI
|
43 |
Sung, E. M., & Choi, W. (2006). The effects of an instructional model of problem-based inquiry learning with internet on inquiry capability, academic achievements, and retention of elementary school student. The Journal of educational Information and Media, 12(2), 129-159.
|
44 |
Ye, J. H., Park, C. B., Seo, H. A., & Song, B. H. (2002). Development and application of web-based instruction program for the enriched course of school biology. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 22(2), 299-313.
|
45 |
Tsai, C. Y., Jack, B. M., Huang, T. C., & Yang, J. T. (2012). Using the cognitive apprenticeship web-based argumentation system to improve argumentation instruction. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21, 476-486.
DOI
|
46 |
Varma, K., & Linn, M. C. (2012). Using interactive technology to support students' understanding of the greenhouse effect and global warming. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21, 453-464.
DOI
|
47 |
Wu, H. L., & Pedersen, S. (2011). Integrating computer-and teacher-based scaffolds in science inquiry. Computers & Education, 57, 2352-2363.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
48 |
Zacharia, Z. C., Xenofontos, N. A., & Manoli, C. C. (2011). The effect of two different cooperative approaches on students' learning and practices within the context of a webquest science investigation. Education Technology Research Development, 59, 399-424.
DOI
|