1 |
Bamberger, Y. M., & Davis, E. A. (2013). Middle-school science students' scientific modelling performances across content areas and within a learning progression. International Journal of Science Education, 35(2), 213-238.
DOI
|
2 |
Boulter, C. J., & Buckly C. B. (2000). Constructing a Typology of Models for Science Education. In J. K. Gilbert & B. C. Boulter (Eds.), Developing models in Science Education, (pp. 41-57). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publusher.
|
3 |
Chamizo, J. A. (2013). A new definition of models and modeling in chemistry' teaching. Science & Education, 22(7), 1613-1632
DOI
ScienceOn
|
4 |
Cho, H., & Nam, J. (2014). The Impact of the Argument-based Modeling Strategy using Scientific Writing implemented in Middle School Science. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 34(6), 583-592.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
5 |
Cho, H., Nam, J., & Lee, D. (2014). The Development of Argument-based Modeling Strategy Using Scientific Writing. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 34(5), 479-490.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
6 |
Cho, H. (2014). Development and effect of argument-based modeling strategy as teaching method in middle school students. Doctoral dissertation, Pusan National University.
|
7 |
Choi, B., Choi, M., Nam, J., & Lee, S. (2002). Effects of the Intervention of Thinking Science Program on Cognitive Development of the 7th Grade Student. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 22(3), 422-431.
|
8 |
Gilbert, S. W., & Ireton, S. W. (2003). Understanding models in earth and space science. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
|
9 |
Gobert, J. D., & Buckley, B. C. (2000). Introduction to model-based teaching and learning in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 22(9), 891-894.
DOI
|
10 |
Ha, J., Lee, H., & Kang, S. (2009). Perception of Science High School Students on Modeling Activity. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 19(1), 187-205.
|
11 |
Harrison, A. G., & Treagust, D. F. (2000). A typology of school science models. International Journal of Science Education, 22(9), 1011-1026.
DOI
|
12 |
Hodson, D. (1993). Re-thinking old ways: towards a more critical approach to practical work in school science. Studies in Science Education, 22, 85-142.
DOI
|
13 |
Inhelder, B., & Piaget, J. (1958). The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence. New York: Basic Books.
|
14 |
Jang, K., Nam, J., & Choi A. (2012). The Effects of Argument-Based Inquiry Using the Science Writing Heuristic (SWH) Approach on Argument Structure in Students' Writing. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 32(7), 1099-1108.
DOI
|
15 |
Justi, R., & Gilbert, J. K. (2002a). Modelling, teachers' views on the nature of modelling, and implications for the education of modelers. International Journal of Science Education, 24(4), 369-387.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
16 |
Justi, R., & Gilbert, J. K. (2002b). Science teachers' knowledge about and attitudes towards the use of models and modelling in learning science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(12), 1273-1292.
DOI
|
17 |
Kwak, K. (2005). The effects of teaching and learning strategy using argumentation on cognitive development and science learning in middle school science. Master's thesis, Pusan National University.
|
18 |
Keys, C. W., Hand, B., Prain, V., & Collins, S. (1999). Using the science writing heuristic as a tool for learning from laboratory investigation in secondary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(10), 1065-1084.
DOI
|
19 |
Khan, S. (2007). Model-based inquiries in chemistry. Science Education, 91(6), 877-905.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
20 |
Kim, J. (1982). Korean pragmatics. Hyungseul Publication Co.
|
21 |
Lee, S. (1994). Communication and the contents of korean language education. Korean language education research, 4(1), 67-83.
|
22 |
Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2000b). Developing model-based reasoning in mathematics and science. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 21(1), 39-48.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
23 |
Lehrer, R., & Schuable, L. (2003). Origins and evaluation of model-based reasoning in mathematics and science. In R. Lesh & H. M. Doerr (Eds.), Beyond constructivism: Models and modelling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning, and teaching (pp. 59-70). Mahwah, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
|
24 |
Lehrer, R., & Schuable, L. (2006). Cultivating model-based reasoning in science education. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 371-387). West Nyack, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.
|
25 |
Maia, P. F., & Justi, R. (2009). Learning of chemical equilibrium through modelling-based teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 31(5), 603-630.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
26 |
Nam, J., Lee, D., & Cho, H. (2011). The Impact of Argumentation-based General Chemistry Laboratory Programs on Multimodal Representation and Embeddedness in University Students' Science Writing. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 31(6), 931-941.
|
27 |
Mendonca, P. C. C., & Justi, R. (2013). The relationships between modelling and argumentation from the perspective of the model of modelling diagram. International Journal of Science Education, 35(14), 2407-2434.
DOI
|
28 |
Nam, J., Koh, M., Park, D., Bak, D., Lim, J., Lee, D., & Choi, A. (2011). The Effects of Argumentation-based General Chemistry Laboratory on Preservice Science Teachers' Understanding of Chemistry Concepts and Writing. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 31(8), 1077-1091.
|
29 |
Nam, J., Kwak, K., Jang, K., & Hand, B. (2008). The Implementation of Argumentation Using Science Writing Heuristic (SWH) in Middle School Science. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 28(8), 922-936.
|
30 |
National Research Council (2011). A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
|
31 |
Oh, P. S., & Oh, S. J. (2011). What teachers of science need to know about models: An overview. International Journal of Science Education, 33(8), 1109-1130.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
32 |
Park, Y. (2012). The Factors Affecting the Cognitive Processes of Writing. Research on Writing, 16, 231-257.
|
33 |
Passmore, C. M., & Svoboda, J. (2012). Exploring opportunities for argumentation in modelling classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, 34(10), 1535-1554.
DOI
|
34 |
Schwarz, C. V., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Kenyon, L., Acher, A Fortus, D., Shwartz, Y., Hug, B., & Krajcik, J. (2009). Developing a learning progression for science modeling: making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 632-654.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
35 |
Saari, H., & Viiri, J. (2003). A research-based teaching sequence for teaching the concept of modelling to seventh-grade students. International Journal of Science Education, 25(11), 1333-1352.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
36 |
Schwarz, C. V. (2009). Developing preservice elementary teachers' knowledge and practices through modeling-centered scientific inquiry. Science Education, 93(4), 720-744.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
37 |
Schwarz, C. V., & White, B. Y. (2005). Metamodelling knowledge: Developing students'' understanding of scientific modelling. Cognition and Instruction, 23(2), 165-205.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
38 |
Shim, W. (1995). Conceptions of Intelligence and Their Implications for Education. The Journal of Elementary Education, 9, 33-48.
|
39 |
Sung, H., & Nam, J. (2013). The Impact of Reading Framework as a Reading Strategy on Writing for Reflection of Middle School Students. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 33(2), 249-265.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
40 |
Sung, H., Hwang, S., & Nam, J. (2012). Examining the Relation Between Students' Reflective Thinking and the Reading Framework in the Science Writing Heuristic (SWH) Approach. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 32(1), 146-159.
DOI
|
41 |
Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
|