1 |
Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., Kim, D., & Reschly, A. L. (2006). Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the student engagement instrument. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 427-445.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
2 |
Cameron, D. (2001). Working with Spoken Discourse. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
|
3 |
Childs, A. & McNicholl, J. (2007). Investigating the relationship between content knowledge and pedagogical practice through the analysis of classroom discourse. International Journal of Science Education, 29(13), 1629-1653.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
4 |
Chin, C. (2006). Classroom interaction in science: Teacher questioning and feedback to students' responses. International Journal of Science Education, 28(11), 1315-1346.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
5 |
Consortium on Chicago School Research at the University of Chicago (2013). 2013 CPS My Voice, My School Student Survey Codebook. Retrieved from http://ccsr.uchicago.edu/page/2013-survey-documentation.
|
6 |
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109.
DOI
|
7 |
Fredricks, J., McColskey, W., Meli, J., Mordica, J., Montrosse, B., & Mooney, K. (2011). Measuring student engagement in upper elementary through high school: A description of 21 instruments. Issues & Answers Report, REL2011-No.098. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/projects/project.asp?projectID=268.
|
8 |
Fredricks, J. & McColskey, W. (2012). The measurement of student engagement: A comparative analysis of various methods and student self-report instruments. In S. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Student Engagement. (pp. 763-782). New York, NY: Springer.
|
9 |
Gal, H., Lin, F.-L., & Ying, J.-M. (2008). Listen to the silence: The left-behind phenomenon as seen through classroom videos and teachers' reflections. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(2), 405-429.
DOI
|
10 |
Gilmore, P. (1985). Silence and sulking: Emotional displays in the classroom. In D. Tannen & M. Saville-Troike, Perspective on Silence, (pp. 205-214). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
|
11 |
Greenwood, C. R., Carta, J. J., Kamps, D., Terry, B., & Delquadri, J. (1994). Development and validation of standard classroom observation system for school practitioners: Ecobehavioral assessment systems software (EBASS). Exceptional Children, 61(2), 197-210.
|
12 |
Greenwood, C. R. & Kim, J. M. (2012). Response to intervention (RTI) services: An ecobehavioral perspective. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 22(1-2), 79-105.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
13 |
Klopfer, L. E. (1971). Evaluation of learning in Science. In B. S. Bloom, J. T. Hastings, & G. F. Madaus (1971). Handbook on Formative and Summative Evaluation of Student Learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
|
14 |
Kelly, G. J. (2007). Discourse in science classrooms. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Science Education, (pp. 443-469). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
|
15 |
Kim, H., Park, B., & Lee, B. (2007). Analysis of the basic inquiry process in Korean science textbooks: Focused on classification, prediction and reasoning. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 26(5), 499-508.
|
16 |
Kim, S. (2008). Silent participation: East Asian international graduate students' views on active classroom participation. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 19(2-3), 199-220.
|
17 |
Lee, B., Park, B., & Kim, H. (2007). Analyses of the basic inquiry process in Korean 3-10 grade science textbooks: Focused on observation and measurement. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 27(5), 421-431.
|
18 |
Lee, H.-J., Yang, I.-H., Seo, H.-D., & Jung, J.-G. (2005). The types of social participation structure appeared in sixth grade elementary science lessons. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 24(2), 123-129.
|
19 |
Lee, J.-A, (2012). The backgrounds and developments of science classroom discourse researches. Korean Journal of Elementary Education, 23(4), 141-156.
|
20 |
Lee, J.-A, Choi, J.-R., Park, E. J., Choi, S.-U., Kim, H.-B., Noh, T., Yoo, J., Yi, K.-W., Kye, Y. H., & Kim, C.-J. (2014). The current conditions and the characteristics of elementary students' science-related engagement in informal setting: Focusing on frequency and companion. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 33(1), 1-20.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
21 |
Miller, R. B., Greene, B. A., Montalvo, G. P., Ravindran, B., & Nichols, J. D. (1996). Engagement in academic work: The role of learning goals, future consequences, pleasing others, and perceived ability. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 388-422.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
22 |
Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking Science: Language, Learning, and Values. New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
|
23 |
Li, H.-L. (2001). Silences and silencing silences. In Philosophy of Education Studies Yearbook. (pp. 157-165). Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.
|
24 |
Meyer, K. R. (2009). Student Classroom Engagement: Rethinking Participation Grades and Student Silence. Doctoral Dissertation, Ohio University.
|
25 |
Ollin, R. (2008). Silent pedagogy and rethinking classroom practice: Structuring teaching through silence rather than talk. Cambridge Journal of Education, 38(2), 265-280.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
26 |
Reda, M. M. (2009). Between Speaking and Silence. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
|
27 |
Roehrig, A. D. & Christesen, E. (2010). Development and use of a tool for evaluating teacher effectiveness in grades K-12. In V. J. Shute & B. J. Becker (Eds.), Innovative Assessment for the 21st Century: Supporting Educational Needs, (pp. 207-228). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
|
28 |
Schultz, K. (2009). Rethinking Classroom Participation: Listening to Silent Voices. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
|
29 |
Seah, L. H., Clarke, D. J., & Hart, C. E. (2014). Understanding the language demands on science students from an integrated science and language perspective. International Journal of Science Education, 36(6), 952-973.
DOI
|
30 |
Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4-13.
DOI
|
31 |
Shapiro, E. S. (2004). Academic Skills Problems: Direct Assessment and Intervention (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
|
32 |
Shapiro, E. S. (2011). Academic Skills Problems: Direct Assessment and Intervention (4th ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
|
33 |
Simon, S., Erduran, S., & Osborne, J. (2006). Learning to teach argumentation: Research and development in the science classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 28(2-3), 235-260.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
34 |
Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A., & Furrer, C. J. (2009). A motivational perspective on engagement and disaffection. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69(3), 493-525.
DOI
|
35 |
Song, J. (2013). The disparity between achievement and engagement in students' science learning: A case of East-Asian regions. In D. Corrigan, R. F. Gunstone, & A. Jones (Eds.), Valuing Assessment in Science Education: Pedagogy, Curriculum, Policy, (pp. 285-306). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
|
36 |
Tatar, S. (2005). Why keep silent? The classroom participation experiences of non-native-English-speaking students. Language and Intercultural Communication, 5(3-4), 284-293.
DOI
|
37 |
Vieira, R. D. & Kelly, G. J. (2014). Multi-level discourse analysis in a physics teaching methods course from the psychological perspective of activity theory, International Journal of Science Education, 36(16), 2694-2718.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
38 |
Wigfield, A., Guthrie, J. T., Perencevich, K. C., Taboada, A., Lutzklauda, S., Mcrae, A., & Barbosa, P. (2008). Role of reading engagement in mediating effects of reading comprehension instruction on reading outcomes. Psychology in the Schools, 45(5), 432-445.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
39 |
Yu, E.-J., Lee, S.-K., Oh, P. S., Shin, M.-K., & Kim, C.-J. (2008). Case studies of the participation structures in secondary science classrooms: Exploring the possibility to develop the 'Space for Hybrid Meaning Making'. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 28(6), 603-617.
|