1 |
Archieve. (2012). Next generation science standards.
|
2 |
Baram-Tsabari, A., & Yarden, A. (2005). Text genre as a factor in the formation of scientific literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(4), 403-428. doi: 10.1002/tea.20063
DOI
ScienceOn
|
3 |
Bricker, L.A., & Bell, P. (2008). Conceptualizations of argumentation from science studies and the learning sciences and their implications for the practices of science education. Science Education, 92(3), 473-498. doi: 10.1002/sce.20278
DOI
ScienceOn
|
4 |
Carey, S., Evans, R., Honda, M., Jay, E., & Unger, C. (1989). 'An experiment is when you try it and see if it works': A study of grade 7 students' understanding of the construction of scientific knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 11(5), 514-529.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
5 |
Carey, S., & Smith, C. (1993). On understanding the nature of scientific knowledge. Educational Psychologist, 28(3), 235-251.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
6 |
Corbin, J.M., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3-21.
DOI
|
7 |
Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1996). Young people's images of science. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
|
8 |
Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287-312.
DOI
|
9 |
Duschl, R.A. (2008). Science education in three-part harmony: Balancing conceptual, epistemic, and social learning goals. Review of research in education, 32(1), 268-291.
DOI
|
10 |
Duschl, R.A., & Osborne, J. (2002). Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education. Studies in Science Education, 38(1), 39-72.
DOI
|
11 |
Falk, H., & Yarden, A. (2009). “Here the scientists explain what i said.” coordination practices elicited during the enactment of the results and discussion sections of adapted primary literature. Research in Science Education, 39(3), 349-383.
DOI
|
12 |
Hand, B.M., Florence, M.K., & Yore, L.D. (2004b). Scientists' views of science, models of writing, and science writing practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(4), 338-369.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
13 |
Hammer, D., & Elby, A. (2002). On the form of a personal epistemology. In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 169-190). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
|
14 |
Hand, B.M., Lawrence, C., & Yore, L.D. (1999). A writing in science framework designed to enhance science literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 21(10), 1021-1035.
DOI
|
15 |
Hand, B.M, Hohenshell, L., & Prain, V. (2004a). Exploring students' responses to conceptual questions when engaged with planned writing experiences: A study with year 10 science students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(2), 186-210.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
16 |
Hapgood, S., Magnusson, S.J., & Sullivan Palincsar, A. (2004). Teacher, text, and experience: A case of young children's scientific inquiry. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(4), 455-505. doi: 10.1207/s15327809jls1304_1
DOI
ScienceOn
|
17 |
Hynd, C., Holschuh, J.P., & Hubbard, B.P. (2004). Thinking like a historian: College students' reading of multiple historical documents. Journal of Literacy Research, 36(2), 141-176.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
18 |
Leach, J., Millar, R., Ryder, J., & Sere, M.-G. (2000). Epistemological understanding in science learning: The consistency of representations across contexts. Learning and Instruction, 10(6), 497-527.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
19 |
Lederman, N.G. (2007). Nature of science: Past, present, and future. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science educaiton (pp. 831-879). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.
|
20 |
Lee, C. (2005). Reconceptualizing disciplinary literacies and the adolescent struggling reader: Placing culture at the forefront. Paper presented at the National Reading Conference.
|
21 |
Louca, L., Elby, A., Hammer, D., & Kagey, T. (2004). Epistemological resources: Applying a new epistemological framework to science instruction. Educational Psychologist, 39(1), 57-68.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
22 |
McNeill, K.L. (2011). Elementary students' views of explanation, argumentation, and evidence, and their abilities to construct arguments over the school year. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(7), 793-823.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
23 |
Moje, E.B. (2007). Developing socially just subject-matter instruction: A review of the literature on disciplinary literacy teaching. Review of research in education, 31(1), 1-44.
DOI
|
24 |
Moje, E.B. (2010). Comprehending in the content areas: The challenges of comprehension, grades 7-12, and what to do about them. In K. G. D. Fisher (Ed.), A comprehensive look at reading comprehension, k-12 (pp. 46-72). New York: Guilford.
|
25 |
Moje, E.B., Peek-Brown, D., Sutherland, L.M., Marx, R.W., Blumenfeld, P., & Krajcik, J. (2004). Explaining explanations: Developing scientific literacy in middle-school project-based science reforms. In D. Strickland & D. E. Alvermann (Eds.), Bridging the gap: Improving literacy learning for preadolescent and adolescent learners in grades 4-12 (pp. 227-251). New York: Teachers College Press.
|
26 |
Osborne, J., Erduran, S., &Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of research in science teaching, 41(10), 994-1020.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
27 |
Osborne, J., MacPherson, A., Patterson, A., & Szu, E. (2012). Introduction. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Perspectives on scientific argumentation: Theory, practice and research: Springer.
|
28 |
Ryu, S., & Sandoval, W.A. (2012). Improvements to elementary children's epistemic understanding from sustained argumentation. Science Education, 96(3), 488-526.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
29 |
Pearson, P. D., Moje, E., &Greenleaf, C. (2010). Literacy and science: Each in the service of the other. Science, 328(5977), 459-463.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
30 |
Pluta, W.J., Chinn, C.A., & Duncan, R.G. (2011). Learners' epistemic criteria for good scientific models. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(5), 486-511. doi: 10.1002/tea.20415
DOI
ScienceOn
|
31 |
Sandoval, W.A. (2005). Understanding students' practical epistemologies and their influence on learning through inquiry. Science Education, 89(4), 634-656.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
32 |
Sandoval, W.A., & Millwood, K.A. (2005). The quality of students' use of evidence in written scientific explanations. Cognition and Instruction, 23(1), 23-55.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
33 |
Sandoval, W.A., & Morrison, K. (2003). High school students' ideas about theories and theory change after a biological inquiry unit. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(4), 369-392.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
34 |
Shin, J., & Choi, A. (2014). Trends in research studies on scientific argument and writing in korea. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 34(2), 107-122.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
35 |
Smith, C.L., Maclin, D., Houghton, C., & Hennessey, M.G. (2000). Sixth-grade students' epistemologies of science: The impact of school science experiences on epistemological development. Cognition & Instruction, 18(3), 349-422.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
36 |
Smith, C.L., & Wenk, L. (2006). Relations among three aspects of first-year college students' epistemologies of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(8), 747-785.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
37 |
Textual Tools Study Group. (2006b). Developing scientific literacy through the use of literacy teaching strategies. In M. K. K. W. R. Douglas (Ed.), Linking science & literacy in the k-8 classroom (pp. 261-285). Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
|
38 |
Sutherland, LeeAnn M. (2008). Reading in science: Developing high-quality student text and supporting effective teacher enactment. The Elementary School Journal, 109(2), 162-180.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
39 |
Textual Tools Study Group. (2006a). Developing scientific literacy through the use of literacy teaching strategies. In R. Douglas, M. Klentschy & K. Worth (Eds.), Linking science & literacy in the k-8 classroom (pp. 261-285). Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
|