1 |
McComas, W. F. (2002a). The principal elements of the nature of science: Dispelling the myths. In W. K. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education (pp. 53-70). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
|
2 |
McComas, W. F. (2002b). A thematic introduction to the nature of science: The rationale and content of a course for science educators. In W. K. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education (pp. 211-222). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
|
3 |
McComas, W. F., & Olson. J. K (2002). The nature of science in international science education standards documents. In W. K. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education (pp. 40-52). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
|
4 |
Nagel, E. (1961). The structure of science: Problems in the logic of scientific explanation. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
|
5 |
Nersessian, N. J. (1999). Model-based reasoning in conceptual change. In L. Magnani, N. Nersessian, & P. Thagard (Ed), Model-based reasoning in scientific discovery (pp. 5-22), New York, NY: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
|
6 |
Ogunniyi, M. B., & Pella, M. O. (1980). Conceptualizations of scientific concepts, laws, and theories held by Kwara state, Nigeria secondary school science teacher. Science Education, 64(5), 591-599.
DOI
|
7 |
Ryan, A. G.. & Aikenhead, G. S. (1992). Students' preconceptions about epistemology of science. Science Education, 76(6), 559-580.
DOI
|
8 |
Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, N. G., & Crawford, B. A. (2004). Developing views of nature of science in an authentic context: An explicit approach to bridging the cap between nature of science and scientific inquiry. Science Education, 88, 610-645.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
9 |
Schwartz, R. S., & Lederman, N. G. (2008). What scientists say: Scientists' views of nature of science and relation to science context. International Journal of Science Education, 30(6), 727-771.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
10 |
Hodson, D. (1985). Philosophy of science, science and science education. Studies in Science Education, 12, 25-57.
DOI
|
11 |
Holloun, I. A. (2006). Modeling theory in science education. Dordrecht: Springer.
|
12 |
Kugler, C. (2002). Darwin's theory, Mendel's laws: Labels & the teaching of science. The American Biology Teacher, 64(5), 341-351.
DOI
|
13 |
Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
|
14 |
Lederman, N. G. (2004). Syntax of nature of science within inquiry and science instruction. In L. B. Flick & N. G. Lederman (Ed), Scientific inquiry and nature of science (pp. 301-317). London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
|
15 |
Lakatos, I. (1980). The methodology of scientific research programmes Volume 1: Philosophical papers. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
|
16 |
Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 331-359.
DOI
|
17 |
Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwrtz, R. S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners' conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 497-521.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
18 |
Losee, J. (2001). A historical introduction to the philosophy of science (4th ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
|
19 |
Matthews, M. R. (1994). Science teaching: The role of history and philosophy of science. London: Routledge.
|
20 |
McComas, W. F., Clough, M. P., & Almazroa, H. (2002). The role and character of the nature of science in science education. In W. K. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education (pp. 3-39). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
|
21 |
Bell, R. L. (2004). Perusing pandora's box. In L. B. Flick & N. G. Lederman, Scientific inquiry and nature of science (pp. 427-446). London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
|
22 |
Bruner, J. S. (1960). The process of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
|
23 |
Campbell, N. R. (1952). What is science? New York, NY: Dover Publication.
|
24 |
Giere, R. N. (2004). How models are used to represent reality. Philosophy of Science, 71, 742-752.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
25 |
Carnap, R. (1966). An introduction to the philosophy of science. New York, NY: Dover Publication.
|
26 |
Dilworth, C. (2006). The metaphysics of science: An account of modern science in terms of principles, laws and theories. Dordrecht: Springer.
|
27 |
Giere, R. N. (1994). The cognitive structure of scientific theory. Philosophy of Science, 61, 276-296.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
28 |
Gilbert, J. K., Boutler, C. J., & Elmer, R. (2000). Positioning models in science education and in design and technology education. In J. K. Gilbert & C. J. Boutler (Ed.), Developing models in science education (pp. 3-19). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
|
29 |
Hanson, N. R. (1965). Patterns of discovery: an inquiry into the conceptual foundations of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
|
30 |
Harre, R. (1970). The principles of scientific thinking. London: Macmillan.
|
31 |
Harre, R. (1972). The philosophies of science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
|
32 |
Hempel, C. G. (1965). Aspects of scientific explanation and other essays in the philosophy of Science. New York, NY: The Free Press.
|
33 |
Hempel, C. G. (1966). Philosophy of natural science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
|
34 |
Giere, R. N. (2006). Scientific perspectivism. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
|
35 |
Aikenhead, G. S., & Ryan, A. G. (1992). The development of a new instrument: "Views on Science-Technology-Society" (VOSTS), Science Education, 76(5), 477-491.
DOI
|
36 |
The Korean Association for Science Education (2005). Science Education Glossary. Seoul: Kyoyookbook.
|
37 |
Toulmin, S. (1953). The philosophy of science. London: Hutchinson.
|
38 |
Wong, S. L., & Hodson, D. (2008). From the horse's mouth: What scientists say about scientific investigation and scientific knowledge. Science Education, 93, 109-130.
|
39 |
Poincare, H. (1905). Science and hypothesis. New York, NY: The Walter Scott Publishing.
|