1 |
Berland, L., & Reiser, B. (2009). Making sense of argumentation and explanation. Science Education, 93(1), 26-55.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
2 |
Stephens, L., & Clement, J. (2010) Documenting the use of expert scientific reasoning process by high school physics students. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 6(2), URL: http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.6.020122.
|
3 |
Stieff, M., & Raje, S. (2010). Expert algorithmic and imagistic problem solving strategies in advanced chemistry. Spatial Cognition & Computation, 10(1), 53-81, 2010.
DOI
|
4 |
Taylor, K. L., & Dionne, J. P. (2000). Problem-Solving strategy knowledge: the complementary concurrent verbal protocols and retrospective debriefing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(3), 413-425.
DOI
|
5 |
Trafton, J. G., Trickett, S. B., & Mintz, F. (2005). Connecting internal and external representations: Spatial transformations of scientific visualizations. Foundations of Science, 10(1), 89-106.
DOI
|
6 |
Trickett, S., & Trafton, J. G. (2002). The instantiation and use of conceptual simulations in evaluating hypotheses: Movies in the mind in scientific reasoning. Peoceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Mahwah, NJ.
|
7 |
Trickett, S. B., & Trafton, J. G. (2007). "What if...": The use of conceptual simulations in scientific reasoning, Cognitive Science, 31(5), 843-875.
DOI
|
8 |
Trickett, S. B., Trafton, J. G., & Schunn, C. D. (2009). How do scientists respond to anomalies? different strategies used in basic and applied science. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(4), 711-729.
DOI
|
9 |
Van Someren, M. W., Barnard, Y. F., & Sandberg, J. A. C. (1994). The think aloud method: A practical guide to modeling cognitive processes. San Diego, CA: Academic press.
|
10 |
Ramadas, J. (2009). Visual and Spatial Modes in Science Learning. International Journal of Science Education, 31(3), 301-318.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
11 |
Reiner, M., & Gilbert, J. (2000). Epistemological resources for thought experimentation in science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 22(5), 489-506.
DOI
|
12 |
Reiner, M. (1998). Thought experiments and collaborative learning in physics. International Journal of Science Education, 20(9), 1043-1058.
DOI
|
13 |
Roberts, M. J., & Newton, E. J. (2003). Individual differences in the development of reasoning strategies. In D. Hardman & L. Macci (Eds.), Thinking: Psychological perspectives on reasoning, judgment, and decision making (pp. 23-43). Chichester: John Wiley.
|
14 |
Stephens, L. & Clement, J. (2006). Designing classroom thought experiments: What we can learn from imagery indicators and expert protocols. Proceedings of the NARST 2006 Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA.
|
15 |
Schwarz, C. V., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Kenyon, L., Acher, A., Fortus, D., Shwartz, Y., Hug, B., & Krajcik, J. (2009). Developing a learning progression for scientific modeling: Making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 632-654.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
16 |
Snir, J., Smith, C. L., & Raz, G. (2003). Linking phenomena with competing underlying models: A software tool for introducing students to the particulate nature of matter. Science Education, 87(6), 794-830.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
17 |
Steedle, J. T., & Shavelson, R. J. (2009). Supporting valid interpretations of learning progression level diagnoses. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 699-715.
DOI
|
18 |
Khan, S. (2008). What if scenarios for testing student models in chemistry. In J. Clement & M. A. Rea-Ramirez (Eds.), Model based learning and instruction in science (Chapter. 8, pp. 139-150). Dordrecht: Springer.
|
19 |
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159-174.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
20 |
Lane, R., & Coutts, P. (2012). Student's alternative conceptions of tropical cyclone causes and processes. International Research in Geographical & Environmental Education, 21(3), 205-222.
DOI
|
21 |
Moulton, S. T., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2009). Imagining predictions: mental imagery as mental emulation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 364(1521), 1273-1280.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
22 |
Nersessian, N. J. (2008). Mental modeling in conceptual change. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), Interntional handbook of conceptual change (pp. 391-416). New York, NY: Routledge.
|
23 |
Mualem, R., & Eylon, B. S. (2010). Junior high school physics: Using a qualitative strategy for successful problem solving. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(9), 1094-1115.
DOI
|
24 |
Nersessian, N. J. (2002). The cognitive basis of model-based reasoning in science. In P. Carruthers, S. Stich, & M. Siegal (Eds.), The cognitive basis of science (pp. 133-153). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
|
25 |
Nersessian, N. J. (1993). In the theoretician's laboratory: Thought experimentation as mental modelling. Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 2, 291-301.
|
26 |
Nersessian, N. J. (2009). How do engineering scientists think? model-based simulation in biomedical engineering research laboratories. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(1), 1-28.
DOI
|
27 |
Galili, I. (2009). Thought Experiments: Determining Their Meaning. science &Education, 18(1), 1-23.
DOI
|
28 |
Gabbard, C. (2012). The role of mental simulation in embodied cognition. Early Child Development and Care, 183(5), 643-650.
|
29 |
Gilbert, J., & Reiner, M. (2000). Thought experiments in science education: potential and current realization. International Journal of Science Education, 22(3), 265-283.
DOI
|
30 |
Gilbert, J., & Reiner, M. (2004). The symbiotic roles of empirical experimentation and thought experimentation in the learning of physics. International Journal of Science Education, 26(15), 1819-1834.
DOI
|
31 |
Kali, Y., Orion, N., & Mazor, E. (1997). Software for assisting high school students in the spatial perception of geological structures, Journal of Geoscience Education, 45(1), 10-21.
|
32 |
Gobert, J. D., & Buckly, B. C. (2000). Introduction to model-based teaching and learning in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 22(9), 891-894.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
33 |
Griffith, T. W., Nersessian, N. J., & Goel, A. (2000). Function-follows-form transformations in scientific problem solving. In Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society 22, 196-201. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
|
34 |
Hegarty, M. (2004). Diagrams in the mind and in the world: Relations between internal and external visualizations. In A. Blackwell et al. (Eds.), Diagrams 2004 Conference Proceedings. LNAI 2980 (pp. 1-13). Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
|
35 |
Kali, Y. (2003). A virtual journey within the rock-cycle: A software kit for the development of systems-thinking in the context of the earth's crust. Journal of GeoScience Education, 51(2), 165-170.
|
36 |
Bogacz, S., & Trafton, J. G. (2005). Using dynamic and static displays: Using images to reason dynamically. Cognitive Systems Research, 6(4), 312-319.
DOI
|
37 |
Botzer, G., & Reiner, M. (2005). Imagery in physics learning - From physicists' practice to naïve students' understanding. In Gilbert, J. K. (Ed.), Visualizations in science education (Vol. 1, pp 147-168). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
|
38 |
Brown, J. R. (1991). The Laboratory of the Mind: Thought Experiments in the Natural Sciences. London: Routledge.
|
39 |
Clement, J. (2000). Model-based learning as a key research area of science education. International Journal of Science Education, 22(9), 1041-1053.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
40 |
Clement, J. (2003). Imagistic simulation in scientific model construction. Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 25. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
|
41 |
Clement, J. (2009). The role of imagistic simulation in scientific thought experiments. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(4), 686-710.
DOI
|
42 |
Clement, J. (2008). Creative model construction in scientists and students: The role of imagery, analogy, and mental simulation. Dordrecht: Springer.
|
43 |
Christensen, B. T., & Schunn, C. D. (2009). The role and impact of mental simulation in design, Cognitive Psychology, 23(3), 327-344.
DOI
|
44 |
Dove, J. E., Everett, L. A. & Preece, P. F. W. (1999). Exploring a hydrological concept through children''s drawings. International Journal of Science Education, 21(5), 485-497.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
45 |
Duschl, R. A., & Osborne, J. (2002). Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education. Studies in Science Education, 38(1), 39-72.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
46 |
Ehrlen, K. (2009). Drawings as representations of children's conceptions. International Journal of Science Education, 31(1), 41-57.
DOI
|
47 |
Ko, M., & Yang, I. (2013). Analysis on the relationship between the construct level of analogical reasoning and the construction of explanatory model observed in small group discussions on scientific problem solving. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 33(2), 522-537.
과학기술학회마을
DOI
|
48 |
Ball, L. J., & Christensen, B. T. (2009). Analogical reasoning and mental simulation in design: Two strategies linked to uncertainty resolution. Design Studies, 30(2), 169-186.
DOI
|
49 |
Garcia-Mila, M., & Andersen, C. (2007). Developmental change in notetaking during scientific inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 29(8), 1035-1058.
DOI
ScienceOn
|