1 |
Grossman, J. B., & Rhodes, J. E. (2002). The test of time: Predictors and effects of duration in youth mentoring relationships. American Journal of community Psychology, 30(2), 271-289.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
2 |
Haeger, W. W., & Feldhusen, J. F. (1989). Developing a mentor program. East Aurora, NY: D.O.K. Publishers.
|
3 |
Harris, R. (1985). The in/out approach to locating mentors for gifted programs. Gifted Child Today, 37(2), 10-11.
|
4 |
Kram, K. E. (1985). Mentoring at work: Developmental relationships in organizational life. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.
|
5 |
MacDonald, L., & Sherman, A. (2007). Student perspectives on mentoring in a science outreach project. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 7(2/3), 133-147.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
6 |
Noller, R. B. (1982). Mentoring: A voiced scarf. Buffalo, NY: Bearly Limited.
|
7 |
O'Neill, D. K., & Polman, J. L. (2004). Why educate "little scientists?"examining the potential of practice-based scientific literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(3), 234-266.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
8 |
Pleiss, M. K., & Feldhusen, J. F. (1995). Mentors role models, and heroes in lives of gifted children. Educational Psychologist, 30(3), 159-169.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
9 |
Purdy, P. (1981). The great mentor hunt: Suggestions for the search. Gifted Child Today, 16(1), 18-20.
|
10 |
Rennie, L. J., & Punch, K. F. (1991). The relationship between affect and achievement in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(2), 193-209.
DOI
|
11 |
Ritchie, S. M., & Rigano, D. L. (1996). Laboratory Apprenticeship through a Student Research Project. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(7), 799-815.
DOI
|
12 |
Scandura, T. A., & Williams, E. A. (2001). An investigation of the moderating effects of gender on the relationships between mentorship initiation and protege perception of mentoring functions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 59(3), 342-363.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
13 |
Schatz, E. (2000). Mentors: Matchmaking for young people. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 11(2), 67-87.
|
14 |
Shim, K. C., & Kim, Y. S. (2005). Science gifted learning program: Research & education model. Journal of Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 25(6), 635-641.
|
15 |
VanTassel-Baska, J. (1989). Counseling the gifted. In J. F. Feldhusen, J. VanTassel-Baska, & K. Seeley (Eds.), Excellence in educating the gifted (pp. 299-314). Denver, CO: Love Publishing.
|
16 |
Walding, R., Foglianl, C., Over, R., & Bain, J. (1994). Gender differences in response to the australian national chemistry quiz. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(8), 833-846.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
17 |
Weinburgh, M. (1995). Gender differences in student attitudes toward science: A metaanalysis of the literature from 1970 to 1991. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(4), 387-398
DOI
ScienceOn
|
18 |
이광형, 편은진, 김영주, 한상준 (2007). 과학영재 를 위한 e-mentoring 활성화방안. KAIST과학영재 교육연구원 연구보고서 2007-19.
|
19 |
김경대, 심재영(2008). R&E 프로그램을 체험한 과학영재들의 사사교육 프로그램 효과에 대한 인식: KAIST 신입생을 중심으로. 한국과학교육학회지, 28(4), 282-290.
|
20 |
박종원 (2009). 과학영재를 위한 사사교육 준비와 유형에 대한 논의. 과학영재교육, 1(3), 1-19.
|
21 |
이선길 (2006). 고등학교 과학영재를 위한 사사 연구(R&E) 프로젝트 학습 모형의 개발과 적용. 박사학위논문. 이화여자대학교.
|
22 |
정영란 (2003). 웹기반 프로젝트 중심 학습이 학습자의 태도, 학습 결과 및 성찰적 실천 과정에 미치는 영향. 박사학위논문. 한양대학교.
|
23 |
정현철, 류춘렬, 채유정 (2012). 과학고 및 영재고 Research and Education (R&E) 운영실태 분석 및 활성화방안 제안: R&E 운영담당자 면담사례를 중심 으로. 영재교육연구, 22(2), 243-264.
|
24 |
최호성, 강호감, 서혜애, 박일영, 이혁우, 이진희, 박경희, 박지현 (2003). 연구와 교육(R&E) 프로그램 을 통한 과학영재의 창의성 신장 방안에 관한 연구. 한국과학재단 정책연구보고서 2002-5092
|
25 |
편은진, 이선길, 오혜미, 이범진 (2008). 일반 과학고와 영재고등학교 R&E 실태 비교를 통한 지원 방 안 특성화 연구. KAIST과학영재교육연구원 연구보고서 2008-40.
|
26 |
Akpinar, E., Yildiz, E., Tatar, N., & Ergin, O. (2009). Students'attitudes toward science and technology: An investigation of gender, grade level, and academic achievement. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 2804-2808.
DOI
|
27 |
Ambrose, D., Allen, J., & Huntley, S. (1994). Mentorship of the highly creative. Roeper Review, 17(2), 131-134.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
28 |
Bell, R., & Lederman, N. G. (2003). Understandings of the nature of science and decision making on science and technology based issues. Science Education, 87(3), 352- 377.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
29 |
Dunbar, K. (1997). How scientists think: On-line creativity and conceptual change in science. In T. B. Ward, S. M. Smith and J. Vaid (Eds.). Creative Thought: An Investigation of Conceptual Structures and Processes (pp. 461- 494). Washington, D. C.: American Psychological Association.
|
30 |
Ellingson, M. K., Haeger, W. W., & Feldhusen, J. F. (1986). The Purdue mentor program: A university-based mentorship experience for GICIT children. Gifted Child Today, 9(2), 2-5.
|
31 |
Gray, W. A. (1982). Mentor-assisted enrichment projects for the gifted and talented. Educational Leadership, 40(2), 16-21.
|
32 |
심규철, 박경애, 길지현 (2009). 과학적 연구 기반 과학영재 사사교육 프로그램 개발. 국제과학영재학회지, 3(1), 9-19.
|