Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2012.32.1.146

Examining the Relation Between Students' Reflective Thinking and the Reading Framework in the Science Writing Heuristic (SWH) Approach  

Sung, Hwa-Mok (Pusan National University)
Hwang, So-Young (Pusan National University)
Nam, Jeong-Hee (Pusan National University)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education / v.32, no.1, 2012 , pp. 146-159 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine the relation between students' reflective thinking and providing the reading framework in implementation of argument-based inquiry using the Science Writing Heuristic (SWH) approach. Participants of this study were 60 $8^{th}$ grade students (two classes). One class (31 students) was assigned to an experimental group and the other class (29 students) was assigned to a comparative group. For the experimental group, five activities using the reading framework with SWH writing template were implemented, while three activities using the reading framework with the SWH writing template and two SWH activities without the reading framework were implemented for the comparative group. The result of this study showed that there was no significant difference in students' reflective thinking between both groups. However, results indicated that providing the reading framework with SWH approach facilitated students' reflective thinking. Therefore, the findings show that providing the reading framework consistently in the SWH approach was effective when it came to facilitating students' reflective thinking.
Keywords
reading; reading framework; writing; reflective thinking; Science Writing Heuristic (SWH);
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 길현정(2010). 학습도구로써 과학글쓰기가 과학학습에 미치는 효과. 부산대학교 박사학위 논문.
2 김미정(2011). 전략적 읽기틀을 이용한 탐구적 과학 글쓰기가 중학생들의 학업성취도와 비판적 사고력 및 요약 글쓰기에 미치는 영향. 이화여자대학교 석사학위 논문.
3 김성은(2005). 담화 구조 학습이 읽기에 미치는 영향: 설명적 텍스트를 중심으로. 이화여자대학교 석사학위 논문.
4 남정희, 곽경화, 장경화, Brian Hand (2008). 논의를 강조한 탐구적 과학글쓰기의 중학교 과학 수업에의 적용. 한국과학교육학회지, 28(8), 922-936.
5 이강님(2007). 구성주의 학습전략이 중학생의 과학 개념학습과 과학적 태도에 미치는 영향 -과학 글쓰기 중심으로-. 전북대학교 박사학위 논문.
6 이영미(2006). 웹 기반 토론에서 반성적 사고 능력 촉진을 위한 질문생성 전략의 적용 효과. 고려대학교 박사학위 논문.
7 허은아(2011). 읽기틀을 이용한 탐구적 일반화학 실험이 대학생의 반성적 사고에 미치는 영향. 부산대학교 박사학위 논문.
8 Alvermann, D. E. (1991). The discussion web: A graphic aid for learning across the curriculum. Reading Teacher, 45(2), 92-99.
9 Butler, D. R. (1995). Zoogeomorphology : animals as geomorphic agents. Cambridge ; New York: Cambridge University Press.
10 Dole, J. A., Duffy, G.G., Roehler, L. R. & Pearson, D. P. (1991). Moving from the old to the new: Research on reading comprehension instruction. Review of Education Research, 61(2), 239-264.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Edmondson, K. M., & Novak, J. D. (1993). The interplay of scientific epistemological views, learning strategies, and attitudes of college students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(6), 547-559.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Emig, J. (1977). Writing as a mode of learning. College Composition and Communication, 28(2), 122-128.   DOI
13 Gaskins, I. W., & Guthrie, J. T. (1994). Integrating instruction of science, reading, and writing: Goals, teacher development, and assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(9), 1039-1056.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Hand, B., Norton-Meier, L., Staker, J., & Bintz, J. (2006). When science and literacy meet in the secondary learning space: Implementing the science writing heuristic (SWH). University of Iowa.
15 Hand, B., Norton-Meier, L., Staker, J., & Bintz, J. (2009). Negotiating science : The critical role of argument in student inquiry, grades 5-10. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann
16 Hatton, N., & Smith, D. (1995). Reflection in teacher education: Towards definition and implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(1), 33-49.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Holden, T. G., & Yore, L. D. (1996). Relationships among prior conceptual knowledge, metacognitive awareness, metacognitive self-management, cognitive style, perception-judgment style, attitude toward school science, self-regulation, and science achievement in grades 6-7 students. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, St. Louis, MO, March 31-April 3.
18 Keys, C. W., Hand, B., Prian, V., & Collins, S. (1999). Using the Science Writing Heuristic as a Tool for Learning from Laboratory Investigations in Secondary Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(10), 1065-1084.   DOI
19 Kuhn, D. (1993). Science as argument: Implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking. Science Education, 77(3), 319-337.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Massey, D. D., & Heafner, T. L. (2004). Promoting reading comprehension in social studies. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 48(1), 26-40.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C. A. (2002). Assessing students' metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 249-259.   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Newton, P., Driver, P., & Osborne, J. (1999). The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science. International Journal of Science Education, 21(5), 553-576.   DOI
23 Perkins, D. N. (1992). Smart schools: From training memories to educating minds. New York: Free Press.
24 Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
25 Pressley, M., Johnson, C. J., Symons, S., McGoldrick, J. A. & Kurita, J. A., (1989). Strategies that improve children's memory and comprehension of text. Elementary School Journal, 90(1), 332.
26 Richardson, J. S., Morgan, R. F., & Fleener, C. E. (2009). Reading to learn in the content areas, 7th ed. Belmont, CA, USA: Wadsworth.
27 Rutherford, F. J., & Ahlgren, A. (1990). Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.
28 Spence, D. J., & Yore, L. D. (1995). Explicit science reading instruction in grade 7: Metacognitive awareness, metacognitive self-management and science reading comprehension. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching , Sanfrancisco, CA, April 22-25.
29 Wellington, J., & Osborne, J. (2001). Language and literacy in science education. Buckingham [England] ; Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
30 Wittrock, M. C. (1989). Generative processes of comprehension. Educational Psychologist, 24(4), 345-376.   DOI   ScienceOn
31 Yore, L. D., Shymansky, J. A., Henriques, L., Chidsey, J. L., & Lewis, J. O. (1997). Reading-to-learn and writing-to-learn science activities for the elementary school classroom. AETS Conference Proceedings.