Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2012.32.1.001

The Analysis of University Student's Modeling Patterns and Perceptions Through Modeling Experiments  

Jang, Eun-Kyung (Korea National University of Education)
Ko, Woon (Korea National University of Education)
Kang, Seong-Joo (Korea National University of Education)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education / v.32, no.1, 2012 , pp. 1-14 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to analyze the student's modeling patterns of modeling experiments. The 1st year students who were taking the general chemistry laboratory course performed three modeling inquiry experiments and submitted laboratory reports. Students expressed the model in a formula form and/or a written form. Student's modeling patterns could be classified by five types; 'Refining tentative modeling', 'Accepting alternative modeling', 'Discarding tentative modeling', 'Failing to find causes', 'Disbelieving results'. This modeling experiment provides for students the opportunity for understanding how a scientific model is created and what the nature of scientific modeling is.
Keywords
modeling; student's modeling pattern; thinking process;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 권용주, 정진수, 강민정, 김영신 (2003). 과학적 가설 지식의 생성 과정에 대한 바탕이론. 한국과학교육학회지, 23(5), 458-469.
2 양일호, 정진수, 권용주, 정진우, 허명, 오창호 (2006). 과학자의 과학지식 생성 과정에 대한 심층 면담 연구. 한국과학교육학회지, 26(1), 88-98.
3 오필석 (2005). 지구과학 교육과정의 새로운 방향 모색; 모델 구성을 통한 지구과학 교수-학습 활동의 제안. 지구과학 교육심포지엄 및 춘계학술발표회.
4 오필석 (2007). 중등학교 지구과학 수업에서 과학적 모델의 활용 양상 분석: 대기 및 해양 지구과학 관련 수업을 중심으로. 한국과학교육학회지, 27(7), 645-662.
5 조흥식, 정선욱, 김진숙, 권지성 (2007). 질적연구 방법론: 다섯 가지 전통. 학지사.
6 하지희, 이화종, 강성주 (2009). 모델링 활동에 대한 과학고등학교 학생들의 인식. 영재교육연구, 19(1), 187-205.
7 채동현, 박현주, 이수영 (2003). 과학교육의 질적 접근. 북스힐, pp 42-49.
8 Danusso, L., & Testa, I., & Vicentini, M. (2010). Improving prospective teachers' knowledge about scientific models and modelling: Design and evaluation of a teacher education intervention. International Journal of Science Education , 32(7), 871-905.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Gilbert, J. K. (2004). Models and modeling: Routes to more authentic science education. International Journal of Science Education, 26(2), 115-130.
10 Halloun, I. (1996). Schematic Modeling for Meaningful Learning of Physics. Journal of Reasearch in Science Teaching, 33(9), 1-26.
11 Harwood, W.(2004). An activity model for scientific inquiry. The Science Teacher, 71(1), 44-46.
12 Khan, S. (2007). Model-Based Inquiries in Chemisty. Science Education, 91(6), 877-905.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Lim, H.-Y., & Kang, S.-J. (2010). Pattern of the University Student's Perception for Unexpected Results and Effect of Problem-Solving Experiments for Change of Perception. J. Korea Assoc. Sci. Edu. 30(3), 366-374.
14 National Research Council (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
15 Schwarz, C., & Gwekwerere, T. (2007). Using a Guided Inquiry and Modeling Instructional Framework to Support Preservise K-8 Science Teaching. Science Education, 91(1), 158-186.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Treagust, D. F., Chittleborough, G., & Thapelo, L. (2002). Students' Understanding of the Role of Scientific Models in Learning Science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(4), 357-368.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Toffler, A. (2006). REVOLUTIONARY WEALTH. Bantam Dell Pub Group. (김중웅 역 (2006). 부의 미래. 청림출판.)
18 Watson, R. (2008). Future Files: 5 Trends for the Next 50 Years(The 5 Trends That Will Shape the Next 50 Years). Nicholas Brealey Publishing. (김원호 역(2009). 퓨처 파일. 청림출판.)