Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2011.31.6.986

The Influences of Inquiry Learning-Based Analogical Experiments on Experimental Design Processes of Science-Gifted Students  

You, Ji-Yeon (Seoul National University)
Park, Youn-Ok (Seoul National University)
Noh, Tae-Hee (Seoul National University)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education / v.31, no.6, 2011 , pp. 986-997 More about this Journal
Abstract
In this study, we developed analogical experimental activities to foster scientific creativity in inquiry learning and applied them to 7th grade science-gifted students. The influences of inquiry learning-based analogical experiments were investigated with respect to the experimental design processes. We classified the patterns of experimental design processes by creative thinking processes and analyzed performance levels by the elements of experimental design processes. The students' experimental design processes were categorized into three kinds of patterns such as reinitiated motion, backward-divergent motion and stationary motion. Those belonging to the reinitiated motion performed precise experimental design from new perspectives by identifying the mapping in depth and considering the elements of experimental design processes. In the case of the backward-divergent motion, they shifted their positions to new directions, but the concreteness of experimental design was insufficient due to the lack of mapping or considering the elements. In the type of stationary motion, maintaining their previous positions, they showed less performance of experimental design without considering the elements sufficiently. Educational implication of these findings are discussed.
Keywords
designing experiments; science-gifted student; analogical experimental inquiry;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 5  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 김경순, 양찬호, 노태희 (2009). 화학 개념학습에서 역할놀이 비유가 대응 관계 이해도 및 대응 오류에 미치는 영향. 한국과학교육학회지, 29(8), 898-909.
2 김유정 (2011). 과학영재를 위한 비유 생성 수업 전략의 개발 및 적용. 서울대학교 대학원 박사 학위논문.
3 김유정, 문세정, 노태희 (2009). 크로마토그래피 개념에 대해 중학교 과학영재가 만든 비유의 유형과 대응 오류 및 비유 만들기 활동에 대한 인식 조사. 한국과학교육학회지, 29(8), 861-873.
4 김종백 (2006). 과학영재를 위한 교수-학습 전략. 영재와 영재교육, 5(2), 19-32.
5 노태희, 양찬호, 강훈식 (2010). 초등학교 5학년 과학영재와 일반 학생들의 포화 용액 개념에 대한 비유 만들기 과정의 유형과 비유 만들기에 대한 인식. 초등과학교육, 29(2), 219-232.
6 류설진 (2009). 생물학자와 과학영재의 실험설계 활동에서 나타나는 과정요소와 특성 분석. 한국교원대학교 대학원 석사 학위 논문.
7 박종원 (2004). 과학적 창의성 모델의 제안. 한국과학교육학회지, 24(2), 375-386.
8 박지영, 이길재, 김성하, 김희백 (2005). 과학영재 교육 프로그램 분석 모형의 고안과 국내의 과학영재를 위한 생물프로그램의 실태 분석. 한국생물교육학회지, 33(1), 122-131.
9 성은현 (2001). 심상적 사고를 통한 창의력 증진 프로그램 개발 및 효과 검증. 한국심리학회지, 14(1), 161-180.
10 유지연, 박연옥, 양찬호, 노태희 (2011). 과학영재들의 적용실험 설계 과정에서 나타나는 과정요소 및 특징. 한국과학교육학회지, 31(4), 528-538.
11 정현철, 한기순, 김병노, 최승언 (2002). 과학 창의성 개발을 위한 프로그램 개발 -이론과 예시를 중심으로-. 한국지구과학회지, 23(4), 334-348.
12 Arce, J., & Betancourt, R. (1997). Studentdesigned experiments in scientific lab instruction. Journal of College Science Teaching, 27(2), 114-118.
13 Baer, J. (1998). The case for domain specificity of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 11(2), 173-177.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Duit, R., Roth, W., Komorek, M., & Wilbers, J. (2001). Fostering conceptual change by analogies: Between scylla and charybdis. Learning and Instruction, 11(4), 283-303   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Snir, J., Smith, C. L., & Raz, G. (2003). Linking phenomena with computing underlying models: A software tool for introducing students to the particulate model of matter. Science Education, 87(6), 794-830.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Solomon, J. (1980). Teaching children in the laboratory. London: Croom Helm.
17 Sternberg, R. J., Kaufman, J. C., & Pretz, J. E. (2002). The creativity conundrum: A propulsion model of kinds of creative contributions. New York: Psychology Press.
18 Treagust, D. F., Harrison, A. G., & Venville, G. J. (1998). Teaching science effectively with analogies: An approach for pre-service and in-service teacher education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 9(2), 85-101.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Wellington, J. (2004). Practical work in school science: Which way now? London: Routledge.
20 Darius, P. L., Portier, K. M., & Schrevens, E. (2007). Virtual experiments and their use in teaching experimental design. International Statistical Review, 75(3), 281-294.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Etkina, E., Karelina, A., Ruibai-Villasenor, M., Rosengrant, D., Jordan, R., & Hmelo- Silver, C. E. (2010). Design and reflection help students develop scientific abilities: Learning in introductory physics laboratories. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(1), 54-98.   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Etkina, E., Murthy, S., & Zou, X. (2006). Using introductory labs to engage students in experimental design. American Journal of Physics, 74(11), 979-986.   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Han, K. (2000). Varieties of creativity: Investigating the domain-specificity of creativity in young children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Nebraska, NE.
24 Hu, W., & Adey, P. (2002). A scientific creativity test for secondary school students. International Journal of Science Education, 24(4), 389-403.   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Karelina, A., & Etkina, E. (2007). Acting like a physicist: Student approach study to experimental design. Physics Education Research, 3(2), 1-12.
26 Kipnis, N. (2005). Scientific analogies and their use in teaching science. Science and Education, 14(3), 199-233.   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Matthew, B. M., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
28 Mayo, J. A. (2001). Using analogies to teach conceptual applications of developmental theories. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 14(3), 187-213.   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Rule, A. C., & Furletti, C. (2004). Using form and function analogy object boxes to teach human body systems. School Science and Mathematics, 104(4), 155-169.   DOI   ScienceOn
30 Singer, J. E., Wu, H., & Tal, R. (2003). Students'understanding of the particulate nature of matter. School Science and Mathematics, 103(1), 28-44.   DOI   ScienceOn