1 |
McDermott, M. A. (2009). The impact of embedding multiple modes of representation on student construction of chemistry knowledge. Unpublished Dotoral Dissertation, University of Iowa.
|
2 |
Pineda, L., & Garza, G. (2000). A model for multimodal reference resolution. Computational Linguistics, 26(2), 139-193.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
3 |
Bernsen, N.O. (1993). A research agenda for modality theory. In Cox, R., Petre, M., Brna, P. and Lee, J., Eds. Proceedings of the Workshop on Graphical Representations, Reasoning and Communication. World Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, Edinburgh, August 1993, 43-46.
|
4 |
Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8(4), 293-332.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
5 |
Elian, B., & Poyas, Y. (2008). Learning with multiple representations: Extending multimedia learning beyond the lab. Learning and Instruction, 18(4), 368-378.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
6 |
Keys, C. W., Hand, B., Prian, V., & Collins, S. (1999). Using the science writing heuristic as a tool for learning from laboratory investigations in secondary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(10), 1065- 1084.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
7 |
Emig, J. (1977). Writing as a mode of learning. College Composition and Communication, 28(2), 122-128.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
8 |
Gibert, J. (2004). Models and modeling: Routes to more authentic science education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(2), 115-130.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
9 |
Hand, B., Choi, A., Greenbowe, T., Schroeder, J., & Bennett, W. (2008). Examining the impact of student use of multiple-mode representations in constructing science arguments. Annual International Conference of National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Baltimore, MD.
|
10 |
Kozma, R. (2003). Technology and classroom practices: An international study. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(1), 1-14.
|
11 |
Kozma, R. (2003). The material features of multiple representations and their cognitive and social affordances for science understanding. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 205-226.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
12 |
Kozma, R. B., & Russell, J. (2005). Students becoming chemists: Developing representational competence. K. Gilbert (Ed.), Visualization in Science Education. Dordrecht: Springer.
|
13 |
Mayer, R. E. (1997). Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? Educational Psychologist, 32(1), 1-19.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
14 |
Mayer, R. E. (2003). The promise of multimedia learning: Using the same instructional design methods across different media. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 125- 139.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
15 |
Anderson, T.L., & Bodner, G. M. (2008). What can we do about 'parker'? a case study of good student who didn't 'get'organic chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 9, 93-101.
DOI
|
16 |
남정희, 곽경화, 장경화, Hand, B. (2008). 논의를 강조한 탐구적 과학 글쓰기(Science Writing Heuristic)의 중학교 과학 수업에의 적용. 한국과학교육학회지, 28(8), 922-936.
|
17 |
왕경수. (2009). 인지 부하와 교수 설계. 초등교육연구, 22(1), 491-522.
|
18 |
Ainsworth, S. E. (1999). The functions of multiple representations. Computers & Education, 33(2-3), 131-152.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
19 |
Bhattacharyya, G., & Bodner, G. M. (2005). "It gets me to the product": How students propose organic mechanisms. Journal of Chemical Education, 82(9), 1402-1407.
DOI
ScienceOn
|