1 |
Vosniadou, S. (2007). Conceptual change and education. Human Development, 50, 47- 54.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
2 |
Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. F. (1992). Mental models of the earth: A study of conceptual change in childhood. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 535-585.
DOI
|
3 |
Wittmann, M. (1998). Making sense of how students come to an understanding of physics: An example from mechanical waves. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland.
|
4 |
Ha, M. & Cha, H. Y. (2009). Pre-service teachers'synthetic view on Darwinism and Lamarckism. Paper in the proceedings at 2009 International Conference of National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Garden Grove, CA.
|
5 |
Hammer, D. M., Elby, A., Scherr, R. E., & Redish, E. F. (2005). Resources, framing, and transfer. In J. Mestre (Ed.), Transfer of learning from a modern multidisciplinary perspective (pp. 89-120). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
|
6 |
Kwon, Y. J., Lee, J. K., Shin, D. H., & Jeong, J. S. (2009). Changes in brain activation induced by the training of hypothesis generation skills: An fMRI study. Brain & Cognition, 69, 391-397.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
7 |
Larkin, J., McDermott, J., Simon, D. P., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Expert and novice performance in solving physics problems. Science, 208(4450), 1335-1342.
DOI
|
8 |
Lee, J. K. (2009). Dissociation of the brain activation network associated with hypothesis-generating and hypothesisunderstanding in biology learning: Evidence from an fMRI study. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Cheongwon, Chungbuk: Korea National University of Education.
|
9 |
Lee, J. K., & Kwon, Y. J. (2011). Why traditional expository teaching-learning approaches may founder? An experimental examination of neural networks in biology learning. Journal of Biological Education, 45(2), 83-92.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
10 |
Nehm, R. H., & Ha, M. (2011). Item feature effects in evolution assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(3), 237-256.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
11 |
Nehm, R. H., & Reilly, L. (2007). Biology majors'knowledge and misconceptions of natural selection. BioScience, 57(3), 263-272.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
12 |
Nehm, R. H., & Schonfeld, I. S. (2007). Does increasing biology teacher knowledge of evolution and the nature of science lead to greater preference for the teaching of evolution in schools? Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18(5), 699-723.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
13 |
Nehm, R. H., & Schonfeld, I. S. (2008). Measuring knowledge of natural selection: A comparison of the CINS, an open-response instrument, and an oral interview. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(10), 1131- 1160.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
14 |
Nehm, R. H., & Schonfeld, I. S. (2010). The future of natural selection knowledge measurement: A reply to Anderson et al.(2010). Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(3), 358-362.
|
15 |
박정, 홍미영 (2002). 문항 유형에 따른 과학 능력 추정의 효율성 비교. 한국과학교육학회지, 22(1), 122-131.
|
16 |
박정, 홍미영, 김성숙, 전현정 (2000). 제3차 수학.과학 성취도 국제 비교 연구 (TIMSS-R) 국내 평가 결과 분석 연구II. 한국교육과정평가원. 연구보고RRE 2000-7.
|
17 |
이안나, 권용주, 정진수, 양일호 (2007). 동물 행동학자의 연구 활동에서 나타나는 연구 단계, 사고 과정, 행동 양식 및 생성 지식에 관한 연구. 한국생물교육학회지, 35(3), 361-373.
|
18 |
Anderson, D. L., Fisher, K. M., & Norman, G. J. (2002). Development and evaluation of the conceptual inventory of natural selection. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(10), 952-978.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
19 |
Chi, M. T. H. (1996). Constructing selfexplanations and scaffolded explanations in tutoring. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10(7), 33-49.
DOI
|
20 |
Caleon, I. S., & Subramaniam, R. (2010). Do students know what they know and what they don't know? Using a four-tier diagnostic test to assess the nature of students alternative conceptions. Research in Science Education, 40(3), 313-337.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
21 |
Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5(2), 121-152.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
22 |
Choi, K, Lee, H, Shin, N., Kim, S. W., & Krajcik, J. (2011). Re-conceptualization of scientific literacy in South Korea for the 21st Century. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 48(6), 670-697.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
23 |
diSessa, A. A. (1988). Knowledge in pieces. In G. Forman & P. Pufall (Eds.), Constructivism in the computer age (pp. 49- 70). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
|
24 |
Dochy, F. (2001). A new assessment era: different needs, new challenges. Learning and Instruction, 10(1), 11-20.
|
25 |
Gitomer, D. H., & Duschl, R. A. (2007). Establishing multilevel coherence in assessment. In P. A. Moss (Ed.), Evidence and decision making. The 106 th yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part I (pp. 288-320 ). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
|
26 |
Scouller, K. (1998). The influence of assessment method on students'learning approaches: Multiple choice question examination versus assignment essay. Higher Education, 35(4), 453-472.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
27 |
Nehm, R. H., Ha, M., Rector, M., Opfer, J., Perrin, L., Ridgway, J., Mollohan, K. (2010). Scoring Guide for the Open Response Instrument (ORI) and Evolutionary Gain and Loss Test (EGALT). Technical Report of National Science Foundation REESE Project 0909999. Accessed online January 10, 2011 at: http://evolutionassessment.org
|
28 |
Park, J. (2010). Constructive multiple choice testing system. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(6), 1054-1064.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
29 |
Pyc, M. A., & Rawson, K. A. (2010). Why testing improves memory: Mediator effectiveness hypothesis. Science, 330(6002), 335.
DOI
|
30 |
Southerland, S. A., Abrams, E., Cummins, C. L., & Anzelmo, J. (2001). Understanding students' explanations of biological phenomena: Conceptual frameworks or pprims? Science Education, 85(4), 328-348.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
31 |
Tan, K. C. D., Goh, N. K., Chia, L. S., & Treagust, D. F. (2002). Development and application of a two tier multiple choice diagnostic instrument to assess high school students' understanding of inorganic chemistry qualitative analysis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(4), 283-301.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
32 |
Vosniadou, S. (1994). Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 4(1), 45-69.
DOI
ScienceOn
|