1 |
박정, 홍미영(2002). 문항 유형에 따른 과학 능력 추정의 효율성 비교. 한국과학교육학회지. 22(1), 122-131.
과학기술학회마을
|
2 |
Black, P. J. (1990). APU science - the past and the future. School Science Review, 72(258), 28-43.
|
3 |
Black, P. J. (1998). Testing: friend or foe? : Theory and Practice of Assessment and Testing. Falmer Press.
|
4 |
Woolnough, B. E. (1989). Toward holistic view of precesses in science education, in J. Wellington (Ed.) Skills and processes in science education: a critical analysis(pp. 115-134). London: Routledge.
|
5 |
Wilson, M., Sloane, K., Roberts, L., & Henke, R. (1995). Setup course I, issues, evidence and you: Achievement evidence from pilot implementation. University of California, Berkeley.
|
6 |
Waltman, K., Kahn, A., & Koency, G. (1998). Alternative approaches to scoring: The effects of using different scoring methods on the validity of scores from a performance assessment. CSE Technical Report, 488.
|
7 |
Wilson, M., & Sloane, K. (2000). From principles to practice: An embedded assessment system. Applied Measurement in Education, 13(2), 181-208.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
8 |
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2001). ATLAS of science literacy. Vol. 1. American Association for the Advancement of Science.
|
9 |
지은림 (2000). 논술형 수행평가를 위한 채점방법들의 비교. 경희대학교 교육문제연구소 논문집, 16, 235-246
|
10 |
한국교육과정평가원 (2001). 제7차 교육과정에 따른 성취기준 평가기준.
|
11 |
이관용, 김기중 (1993). 기초 심리통계학, 법문사.
|
12 |
지은림 (1999). 사회과 보고서 수행평가를 위한 총체적 채점과 분석적 채점의 비교. 교육평가연구, 12(2), 11-24.
|
13 |
이규민 (2007). 초등학교 과학과 수행평가의 총체적 채점과 분석적 채점 방식에 대한 일반화가능도분석. 아동교육, 16(4), 169-184.
|
14 |
이기영, 안희수 (2005). 중등학교 과학 수행평가의 평가 유형과 채점 방식 및 신뢰도 분석. 한국과학교육학회지, 25(2), 173-183.
|
15 |
Qualification and Curriculum Authority (2007). Science: Programme of study for key stage 4 in the national curriculum 2007. London: Qualifications and Curriculum Development Agency.
|
16 |
Roberts, L., Wilson, M., & Draney, K. (1997) The setup assessment system: An overview. BEAR report series, SA-97-1, University of California, Berkeley.
|
17 |
유준희, 박승재 (1999). 과학과 수행평가. 열린교육연구, 7(1), 247-262
|
18 |
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Ruddock, G. J., O'Sullivan, C. Y., Arora, A., & Erberber, E. (2005). TIMSS 2007 assessment frameworks. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College.
|
19 |
Plake, B. S., & Hambleton, R. K. (1999). A standard-setting method designed for complex performance assessments: categorical assessments of student work. Educational Assessment, 6(3), 197-215.
|
20 |
Herman, J. L., Aschbacher, P. R., & Winters, L. (1992). A practical guide to alternative assessment. Alexandria, VA; ASCD.
|
21 |
성태제 (2002). 타당도와 신뢰도. 학지사.
|
22 |
김석우 (2007). 고등학교 과학과 수행평가 실태분석 및 개선방안. 교육평가연구, 20(4), 53-73.
|
23 |
Klein, S. P., Stecher, B. M., Shavelson, R., McCaffrey, D., Bell, R. M., Comfort, K., Othman, A. R., & Ormseth, T. (1998). Analytic versus holistic scoring of science performance tasks. Applied Measurement in Education, 11(2), 121-137.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
24 |
Linn, R. L., Baker. E. L., & Dunbar, S. B. (1991). Complex, performance-based assessment: Expectations and validation criteria. Educational Researcher, 20(8), 15-21.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
25 |
Etkina, E., Van Heuvelen, A., White- Brahmia, S., Brookes, D. T., Gentile, M., Murthy, S., Rosengrant, D., & Warren, A. (2006). Developing and assessing student scientific abilities. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 2(2), 020103-1-020103-15.
DOI
|
26 |
성태제 (2005). 문항반응이론의 이해와 적용. 교육과학사.
|
27 |
박정 (2001). 문항반응이론을 활용한 수행형 평가문항 분석방법. 교육학연구, 39(2), 215-232.
|
28 |
Hafner, J. C., & Hafner, P. M. (2003). Quantitative analysis of the rubric as an assessment tool: an empirical study of student peer-group rating. International Journal of Science Education, 25(12), 1509-1528.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
29 |
Halonen, J. S., Bosack, T., Clay, S., & McCarthy, M. (2003). A rubric for learning, teaching, and assessing scientific inquiry in psychology. Teaching of Psychology, 30(3), 196-208.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
30 |
김명숙 (1999). 영어작문 수행평가의 채점행위 분석 연구. 교육평가연구, 12(2), 25-54.
|
31 |
김경희, 송미영 (2001). 채점척도에 따른 채점자의 일관성과 피험자 능력 추정의 정확성 비교. 교육평가연구, 14(1), 327-347.
|