Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2009.29.3.314

Korean Pre-service Teachers' Understanding about the Nature of Science (NOS)  

Seung, Eul-Sun (Indiana State University)
Bryan, Lynn A. (Purdue University)
Nam, Jeong-Hee (Pusan National University)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education / v.29, no.3, 2009 , pp. 314-328 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine Korean preservice science teachers' understanding of the nature of science (NOS). Thirty-one Korean preservice teachers were given an open-ended questionnaire about their understanding of NOS. The Korean preservice teachers' responses were categorized according to pattern and theme. These findings will provide information to aid in the development of curriculum and instruction to improve preservice teachers' understanding of NOS. Compared to in previous studies, Korean preservice teachers demonstrated various philosophical stances that have been suggested by philosophers of science. In addition, they were more likely to connect science to human endeavors and social needs. These results were interpreted in relation to the influence of the science methods course, secondary science curriculum, and the traditional cultural view.
Keywords
the nature of science; preservice science teachers; philosophical stances; cultural differences in the views about NOS social/cultural influences;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 McComas, W.F., & Olson, J.K. (1998). The nature of science in international science education standards. In W.F. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education: Rationales and Strategies (pp. 41-52). Dordrecht: Kluwer
2 Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R.L., & Lederman, N. G. (1998). The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural natural. Science Education, 82, 417-437   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Aguirere, I.M., Haggerty, S.M., & Linder, C.J. (1990). Student-teachers' conceptions of science, teaching, learning: A case study inpreservice science education. International Journal of Science Education, 12, 381-390   DOI
4 Casti, J. L. (1989). Paradigms lost: Images of man in the mirror of science. New York, NY: Morrow
5 Eichinger, D.C., Abell, S.K.,& Dagher, Z.R.(1997). Developing a graduate level science education course on the nature of science. Science & Education, 6, 417-429   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Haukoos, G. D., & Penick, J. E. (1983). The influence of classroom climate on college science students: A replication study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22, 163-168   DOI
7 Hammrich, P.L. (1997). Confronting teacher candidates' conception of the nature of science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 8, 141-151   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Kang, S., Scharmann, L.C., & Noh, T. (2004). Examining students' views on the nature of science: Results from Korean 6th, 8th, and 10th graders. Science Education, 89, 314-334   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 91-195). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
10 Lederman, N.G., Schwartz, R., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Bell, R.L. (2001). Preserviceteachers' understanding and teaching of nature of science: An intervention study. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education, 1, 135-160   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Lederman, N.G., & Zeidler, D.L. (1987). Science teachers'conceptions of the nature of science: Do they influence teacher behavior? Science Education, 71, 721-734   DOI
12 Lederman, N.G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R.L., & Schwartz, R.S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners' conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 497-521   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Lederman, N.G. (1992). Students and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 331-359   DOI
14 Akerson, V.L., Abd-El-Khalick, F. , & Lederman, N.G. (2000). Influence of a reflective explicit activity-based approach on elementary teachers' conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 295-317   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Kawagley, A.O., & Norris-Tull, D., & Norris-Tull, R.A. (1998). The indigenous worldview of Yupiaq culture: Its scientific nature and relevance to the practice and teaching science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(2), 133-144   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Moss, D. M., Abrams, E. D., & Robb, J. (2001). Examining student conceptions of the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 771-790   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Smith, M.U., Lederman, N.G., Bell, R.L., McComas,W.F., & Clough, M. P. (1997). How great is the disagreement about NOS? A response to Alters. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 1101-1104   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Gallagher, J.J. (1991). Perspective and practicing secondary school science teachers' knowledge and beliefs about the philosophy of science. Science Education, 75, 121-134   DOI
19 Duschl, R.A. (1990). Restructuring science education. New York: Teachers College Press
20 Hodson, D. (1993). Philosophic stance of secondary school science teachers, curriculum experiences, and children's understanding of science: Some preliminary findings. Interchange, 24, 41-52   DOI
21 American Association for the Advancement of Science (1989). Project 2061: Science for all Americans. Washington, DC: Author
22 Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Improving science teachers' conceptions of nature of science: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 665-701   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Allen, N.J., & Crawley, F. E. (1998). Voices from the bridge: Worldview conflicts of Kickapoo students of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 111-132   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Bloom, J.W. (1989). Preservice elementary teachers' conceptions of science: Science, theories and evolution. International Journal of Science Education, 11(4), 401-415   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Blanco, R. & Niaz, M. (1998). Baroque tower on a gothic base: A Lakatosian reconstruction of students' and teachers' understanding of structure of the Atom. Science and Education, 7, 327-360   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Liu, S.Y., & Lederman, N.G. (2003, August). Taiwanese preservice teachers' conceptions of nature of science. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Philadelphia, PA
27 Palmquist, B.C. & Finley F.N. (1997). Preservice teachers'views of NOS during a postbaccalaureate science teaching program. Journal of Research in Science Education, 34(6), 595-615
28 Matkins, J.J., Bell, R., Irving, K. & McNall, R. (2002). Impacts of contextual and explicit instruction on preservice elementary teachers' understandings of the nature of science. Paper presented at the Annual International Conference of the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science. Charlotte, NC, January 10-13, 2002
29 Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Open coding. In A. Strauss & J. Corbin (Eds.), Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques (2nd ed.) (pp. 101-121). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
30 Lederman, N.G., & O'Malley, M.(1990). Students' perceptions of tentativeness in science: Development, use, and sources of change. Science Education, 74, 225-239   DOI
31 King, B.B. (1991). Beginning teachers' knowledge of and attitudes toward history and philosophy of science. Science Education, 75, 135-141   DOI
32 Osborne, J., Collins, S., Ratcliffe, M., Millar, R., & Duschl, R. A. (2003). What "ideas-aboutscience" should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the expert community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 692-720   DOI   ScienceOn
33 Lederman, N.G., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (1998). Avoiding de-natured science: Activities that promote understandings of the nature of science. In W.F. McComas (ed.), The nature of science in science education: Rationale and strategies. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 83-126
34 Popper, K.R. (1963). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Routledge
35 Bell, R.L., Lederman, N.G., & Abd-El- Khalick, F. (2000). Developing and acting upon one's conceptions of the nature of science: A follow-up study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 563-581   DOI   ScienceOn
36 Glaser, B.G., & Strauss, A.L. (1967). Discovery of grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press
37 Bright. P., & Yorr. L. D. (2002. April). Elementary preservice teachers' beliefs about the nature of science and their influence on classroom practice. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans, LA
38 Kuhn, T.S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolution (3rd ed). Chicago: University of Chicago Press
39 Lin, H.S. (1998, April). Promoting pre-service science teachers' understanding about the nature of science through history. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Sandago, CA
40 Seung, E., & Bryan, L.A. 2009. Improving preservice middle grades science teachers' understanding of the nature of science using three instructional approaches. Journal of Science Teacher Education, DOI: 10. 1007/s10972-00909130-2   DOI