1 |
Dimes, R. E. (1973). Objective tests and their construction. Physics Education, 8, 251-254
DOI
ScienceOn
|
2 |
Harlen, W. (2005). On the relationship between assessment for formative and summative purposes. In J. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and learning (1st ed., pp. 103-118). London: Sage
|
3 |
Haslam, F., & Treagust, D. F. (1987). Diagnosing secondary students' misconceptions of photosynthesis and respiration in plants using a two-tier multiple choice instrument. Journal of Biological Education, 21(3), 203-210
DOI
|
4 |
Lee, M. (1998). Development of the three-tier test items for the thinking skills of the scientific inquiry. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 18(4), 643-650
과학기술학회마을
|
5 |
Lee, M., & Pak, S. (1996). Development of twotier test items for the thinking skills of the scientific inquiry. Journal of Science Education in Seoul National University, 21(1), 19-33
|
6 |
McDermott, L. C. (1998). Students' conceptions and problem solving in mechanics. In A. Tiberghien, E. L. Jossem, & J. Barojas (Eds.), Connecting research in physics education with teacher education (pp. 1-6). Ann Arbor: International Commission on Physics Education
|
7 |
Park, Y., & Cho, Y. (2005). Analysis of physics problem solving processes of high school students to qualitative and quantitative problems. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 25(4), 526-532
과학기술학회마을
|
8 |
Scott, B. L. (1985). A defense of multiple choice tests. American Journal of Physics, 53(11), 1035
|
9 |
Barr, B. B. (1993). Research on problem solving: Elementary school. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 237-247). New York: Macmilian Publishing Company
|
10 |
Burton, R. F. (2001). Quantifying the effects of chance in multiple choice and true/false tests: Question selection and guessing of answers. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 26(1), 41-50
DOI
ScienceOn
|
11 |
Andersson, B. (2000). National evaluation for the improvement of science teaching. In R. Millar, J. Leach, & J. Osborne (Eds.), Improving science education: The contribution of research (pp. 62-78). Birming-ham: Open University Press
|
12 |
Bae, J. (2007, December 23). Massive lawsuits expected over college test. The Korea Times. Retrieved May 27, 2009, from http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/nation/2007/12/113_16003.html
|
13 |
Herman, J. L., & Golan, S. (1993). The effects of standardized testing on teaching and schools. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 12(4), 20-25
DOI
ScienceOn
|
14 |
Lawrenz, F. (2007). Review of science education program evaluation. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 943-963). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers
|
15 |
Lee, M., & Pak, S. (1995). A comparative study on multiple choice items of 4 options and 5 options for the thinking skills of the scientific inquiry. Journal of Science Education in Seoul National University, 20(1), 151-160
|
16 |
Linn, R. L., & Gronlund, N. E. (1993). Measurement and evaluation in teaching (10th ed.). New Jersey: The Macmillan Company
|
17 |
Rebello, N. S., & Zollman, D. A. (2004). The effect of distracters on student performance on the force concept inventory. American Journal of Physics, 72(1), 116-125
DOI
ScienceOn
|
18 |
Sangster, A. (1992). Computer-based instruction in accounting education. Accounting Education, 1(1), 13-32
DOI
ScienceOn
|
19 |
Treagust, D. F. (2002). Development and application of a two-tier multiple choice
diagnostic instrument to assess high school students' understanding of inorganic chemistry qualitative analysis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(4), 283-301
DOI
ScienceOn
|
20 |
Knight, P. (2001). A briefing on key concepts: Formative and summative, criterion and normreferenced assessment. New York: Learning and Teaching Support Network
|
21 |
Hargreaves, A., Earl, L., Moore, S., & Manning, S. (2001). Learning to change: Teaching beyond subjects and standards. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
|
22 |
Tamir, P. (1998). Assessment and evaluation in science education: Opportunities to learn and outcomes. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 761-790). London: Kluwer Academic Publishers
|
23 |
Bell, B. (2007). Classroom assessment of science learning. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 965-1006). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers
|
24 |
Atkin, J. M., Coffey, J. E., Moorthy, S., Thibeault, M., & Sato, M. (2005). Designing everyday assessment in the science classroom. New York: Teachers College Press
|
25 |
Taber, K. S. (2003). Examining structure and context—Questioning the nature and purpose of summative assessment. School Science Review, 85(311), 35-41
ScienceOn
|
26 |
Kim, M., Choi, J., & Song, J. (2007). Developing a web-based system for testing students' physics misconceptions (WEBSYSTEM) and its implementation. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 27(2), 105-119
과학기술학회마을
|
27 |
Haynes, S. N., Richard, D. C. S., & Kubany, E. S. (1995). Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 238-247
DOI
ScienceOn
|
28 |
Sahlberg, P. (2004). Teaching and globalization. Managing Global Transitions, 2(1), 65-83
|
29 |
Engelhart, M. D. (1965). A comparison of several item discrimination indices. Journal of Educational Measurement, 2(1), 69-76
DOI
ScienceOn
|
30 |
Mitchell, I., & Baird, J. (1986). Teaching, learning and curriculum 1: The influence of content in science. Research in Science Education, 16, 141-149
DOI
|
31 |
Maloney, D. P. (1994). Research on problem solving: Physics. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 327-354). New York: MacMillan Publishing Company
|
32 |
Gronlund, N. E. (1971). Measurement and evaluation in teaching. New York: The Macmillan Company
|
33 |
Hudson, H. T., & Hudson, C. K. (1981). Suggestions on the construction of multiplechoice tests. American Journal of Physics, 49(9), 838-841
DOI
|
34 |
Kwon, J., & Lee, S. (1987). A comparative analysis of expert's and novice's thinking processes in solving physics problems. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 8(1), 43-55
과학기술학회마을
|
35 |
Stark, R. (1999). Measuring science standards in Scottish schools: The assessment of achievement programme. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 6(1), 27-41
DOI
ScienceOn
|
36 |
Bak, H., & Kwon, J. (1990). A study on analysis of novice's protocol in solving physics problems. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 10(1), 57-64
과학기술학회마을
ScienceOn
|