Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2009.29.2.193

Undergraduates' Response Pattern on the Problem-Solving-Type General Chemistry Laboratory  

Lim, Hee-Young (Korea National University of Education, Department of Chemistry Education)
Kang, Seong-Joo (Korea National University of Education, Department of Chemistry Education)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education / v.29, no.2, 2009 , pp. 193-202 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate undergraduates' characteristics of problem-solving process through analysis of the response patterns on problem-solving laboratory. For this purpose, 18 freshmen taking a problem-solving-type general chemistry laboratory had been interviewed for the analysis of the characteristics of problem-solving process. According to the results, the students' responses have been classified into five types; trying to solve problems using new factors, trying to solve problems by finding missing factors in manual, recognizing problem-situations but just repeating the given process, not recognizing problem-situations but trying to solve doubts generated during execution, satisfying about results, and taking no further action. These results can be used as materials to suggest the role model of the students' laboratory execution and to look back on each students' execution.
Keywords
problem-solving laboratory; response pattern; undergraduate;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 7  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Blosser , P. E. (1988). Lab-Are They Really as Valuable as Teacher Think They are? The Science Teacher 55(5). 57-59
2 Domin, D. S. (1999). A Review of Laboratory Instruction Styles. J. Chem. Ed., 76(4), 543-547   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Dunbar, K. (1993). Concept Discovery in a Scientific Domain. Cognitive Science Society, 17, 397-434   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Dunbar, K. (2000) How Scientists Think in the Real World: Implications for Science Education. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 21(1), 49-58   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Hofstein A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The Laboratory in Science Education: Foundations for the Twenty-First Century, Science Education, 88. 28-54   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Kampourakis, C., & Tsaparlis, G. (2003). A Study of the Effect of a Practical Activity on Problem Solving in Chemistry. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice, 4(3), 319-333   DOI
7 Hofstein, D. (1988). Practical Work and Science Education Ⅱ. In, P. Fensham (Ed.). Development and Dilemmas in Science Education(pp. 188-217). London: The Farmer Press
8 양일호, 조현준, 정진우, 허명, 김영신 (2006). 학교과학교육에서 실험활동의 목적: 전문가 커뮤니티를 통한 델파이 연구. 한국과학교육학회지, 26(2) 177-190   과학기술학회마을
9 Johnson, A. M. F. (2006). The Beliefs and Practices of General Chemistry Students and Faculty Members Regarding Knowledge Transfer: A Phenomenographic Study. Purdue University West Lafayette, Indiana
10 Bodner, G. M. & Herron, J. D. (2002). Problem-solving in Chemistry. In Gilbert, J. K. & Jong, O. D. & Justi, R. & Treagust, D. F. & Driel J. V. (Eds.) Chemical Education: Towards Research-based Practice (pp. 235-266). Kluwer Academic Publishers
11 Roth, W. M. (1994). Experimenting in a Constructivist High School Physics Laboratory. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 197-223   DOI   ScienceOn
12 조연순, 성진숙, 채제숙, 구성혜(2000). 창의적 문제해결력 신장을 위한 초등과학교육과정 개발 및 적용. 한국과학교육학회지, 20(2), 307-328   과학기술학회마을
13 양일호, 정진우, 김영신, 김민경, 조현준(2006a). 중등학교 과학 실험 수업에 대한 실험 목적${\cdot}$상호작용${\cdot}$탐구 과정의 분석. 한국지구과학회지, 27(5), 509-520   과학기술학회마을
14 McGarvey, D. J. (2004). Experimenting with Undergraduate Practicals. U. Chem. Ed., 8, 58-65
15 최경희, 조연순, 조덕주(1998). 창의적 문제 해결력 신장을 위한 중학교 과학교육과정 연구-현행 교육 과정과 수업현장 분석을 중심으로-. 한국과학교육학회지, 18(2), 149-160   과학기술학회마을
16 AAAS(American Association for the Advancement of Science). (1989). Science for all Americans. A Project 2061 Report on Literacy Goals in Science, Mathematics and Technology: Washington, D. C. AAAS, pp. 11-15
17 Kvale, S. (1987). Validity in the Qualitative Research Interview. Methods: A Journal for Human Science, 1(2), 37-72
18 정현철, 한기순, 김병노, 최승언(2002). 과학 창의성 계발을 위한 프로그램 개발 -이론과 예시를 중심으로-. 한국지구과학회지, 23(4), 334-348   과학기술학회마을
19 강호감, 노석구, 이희순, 홍석인, 최선영, 원용준, 하정원, 김지선(2001). 창의력 계발을 위한 자연과 교수${\cdot}$학습 자료 개발 -2. 개발과 적용-. 한국과학교육학회지, 21(1), 89-101   과학기술학회마을
20 윤덕근, 김성하, 차희영, 이길재, 정완호(2004), 과학고 학생들의 창의력과 과학적 사고력 향상을 위한 생물 실험 모듈의 적용 효과. 한국과학교육학회지, 24(3), 556-564   과학기술학회마을
21 조연순, 최경희(2000). 창의적 문제 해결력 신장을 위한 중학교 과학 교육과정 개발. 한국과학교육학회지, 20(2), 329-343   과학기술학회마을
22 김희경, 송진웅 (2003). 과학 실험의 목적에 대한 중학생의 인식 조사. 한국과학교육학회지, 23(3), 254-264   과학기술학회마을
23 Staer, H., Goodrum, D., & Hackling, M. (1998). High School Laboratory Work in Western Australia: Openness to Inquiry. Research in Science Education, 28(2), 219-228   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Chang, C. Y., & Weng, Y. H. (2002). An Exploratory Study on Students' Problem- Solving Ability in Earth Science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(5), 441-451   DOI   ScienceOn
25 이화정, 강성주(2005). 교사 양성 대학에서의 일반화학 실험 개선과 적용. 한국과학교육학회지, 25(3), 346-352   과학기술학회마을
26 Germann, P. J., Aram, R. A., ＆ Burke, G. (1996). Identifying Patterns and Relationships among the Responses of Seventh-Grade Students to the Science Process Skills of Designing Experiments. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(1), 79-99   DOI
27 Tobin, K. (1990). Research on Science Laboratory Activities. School Science and Mathematics, 90(5), 403-418   DOI
28 양일호, 조현준, 한인경(2006b). 초등과학교육에서 실험활동의 목적에 대한 교사와 학생의 인식. 학습자중심교과교육연구, 6(1), 235-252
29 Booth, S. (1997). On Phenomenography: Learning and Teaching. Higher Education Research and Development, 16, 135-158   DOI   ScienceOn
30 NRC (1996). Science Teaching Standards, National Academy Press, Washington D.C. 27-54
31 김영신, 양일호, 박경숙(2006). 대학교 과학 실험 수업의 질 분석. 중등교육연구, 54(1), 79-94
32 양일호, 조현준(2005). 학교 과학수업에서의 실험의 목적에 대한 고찰. 초등과학교육, 24(3), 268-280   과학기술학회마을
33 이은경, 강성주(2008). 학생-학생 언어적 상호작용 분석을 통한 문제 해결형 탐구 모듈에서의 SWH 활용 효과, 한국과학교육학회지, 28(2), 130-138   과학기술학회마을
34 홍미영, 박윤배(1994). 대학생들의 기체의 성질에 대한 문제해결 과정의 분석. 한국과학교육학회지, 14(2), 143-158   과학기술학회마을