Browse > Article

Teaching Models for Scientific Inquiry Activity through the Nature of Science (NOS)  

Park, Jong-Won (Chonnam National University)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education / v.28, no.7, 2008 , pp. 759-767 More about this Journal
Abstract
This article arose from the previous studies, which suggested a synthetic list for the nature of science (NOS), discussed the relationship between the NOS and scientific inquiry and the development of the NOS in the context of scientific inquiry. In this article, for teaching scientific inquiry through the NOS, I proposed three teaching models - reflection, interaction, and the direct model -. Within these teaching models, understanding the NOS is viewed as a prerequisite condition for the improved performance of scientific inquiry. In the reflection model, the NOS is embedded and reflected in scientific inquiry without explicit introduction or direct explanation of the NOS. In the interaction model, concrete interaction between scientific inquiry and the NOS is encouraged during the process of scientific inquiry. In the direct model, subsequent to directly comprehending the NOS at the first stage of activity, students conduct scientific inquiry based on their understanding of the NOS. The intention of this present article is to facilitate the use of these models to develop teaching materials for more authentic scientific inquiry.
Keywords
The nature of science; teaching model; authentic scientific inquiry; science teaching;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Bell, P., and Linn, M.C. (2002). Beliefs about science: how does science instruction contribute? In: B.K. Hofer, and P.R. Pintrich (eds), Personal Epistemology: The Psychology of Beliefs about Knowledge and Knowing (p. 321), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers: London
2 Donnelly, J. (2001). Contested terrain or unified project? 'The nature of science' in the National Curriculum for England and Wales. International Journal of Science Education, 23(2), 181-195   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Hand, B., Prain, V., Lawrence, C., and Yore, L.D. (1999). A writing in science framework designed to improve science literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 10, 1021-1036
4 Jensen, F., and Voogt, P. (1998). Learning by designing: A case of heuristic theory development in science teaching. In: W.F. McComas (ed), The nature of science in history of science in science education: Rationales and strategies (p. 151), Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, Dordrecht.
5 Matthews, M.R. (1994). Science Teaching: The Role of History and Philosophy of Science. Routledge, New York
6 Matthews, M.R. (1998). In defense of modest goals when teaching about the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 167-174
7 National Research Council [NRC] (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards. In: http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=9596 &page=1. Cited 10 January 2008
8 Sandoval, W.A., and Reiser, B.J. (2004). Explanation-Driven inquiry: integrating conceptual and epistemic scaffolds for scientific inquiry. Science Education, 88, 345-372   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Lederman, N.G, Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, G.L., and Schwartz, R.S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners' conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 497-521   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Park, Jongwon., and Kim, Ikgyun. (2004). Classification of students' observational statements in science. In: R. Nata (ed), Progress in Education, Vol.13. (p. 139), Nova Science Publishers, Inc. New York
11 Park, Jongwon. (2006). Modelling Analysis of Students' Processes of Generating Scientific Explanatory Hypotheses. International Journal of Science Education, 28(5), 469-489   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Hodson, D. (1998). Is this really what scientists do? In: J. Wellington (ed), Practical work in school science: Which way now? (p. 93), Routledge, London
13 Ping-Kee Tao. (2003). Eliciting and developing junior secondary students' understanding of the nature of science through a peer collaboration instruction in science stories. International Journal of Science Education, 25(2), 147-171   DOI
14 Toth, E.E., Suthers, D.D., and Lesgold, A. (2002). "Mapping to know": The effects of representational guidance and reflective assessment on scientific inquiry. Science Education, 86, 264-286   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Lederman, N.G. (1998). The state of science education: subject matter without context. Electronic Journal of Science Education 3(2). In: http://unr.edu/homepage/jcannon/ejse/lederman.html. Cited 12 March 2007
16 Carey, S., Evans, R., Honda ,M., Jay, E., and Unger, C. (1989). An experiment is when you try it and see if it works: A study of grade 7 students' understanding of the construction of scientific knowledge [Special issue]. International Journal of Science Education, 11, 514-529   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Sandoval, W.A. (2005). Understanding students' practical epistemologies and their influence on learning through inquiry. Science Education, 89, 634-656   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Akerson, V.L., Morrison, J.A., and McDuffie, A.R. (2006). One course is not enough: Preservice elementary teachers' retention of improved views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(2), 194-213   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Bianchini, J., and Colburn, A. (2000). Teaching the nature of science through inquiry to prospective elementary teachers: A tale of two researchers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(2), 177-209   DOI   ScienceOn
20 National Science Teachers Association [NSTA] (2000) NSTA position statement: The nature of science. In: http://www.nsta.org/about/positions/natureo fscience.aspx. Cited 10 january 2008
21 Abd-El-Khalick, F., and Lederman, N.G. (2000). Improving science teachers' conceptions of nature of science: a critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 665-701   DOI
22 Hempel, C.G. (1965). Aspects of Scientific Explanation. The Free Press, New York
23 Julie Gess-Newsome. (2002). The use and impact of explicit instruction about the nature of science and science inquiry in an elementary science methods course. Science & Education, 11, 56-67
24 Schwartz, R.S., Lederman, N.G., and Crawford, B.A. (2004). Developing views of nature of science in an authentic context: An explicit approach to bridging the gap between nature of science and scientific inquiry. Science Education, 88, 610-645   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Park, Jongwon. (2007). A Study of New Models for Scientific Inquiry Activity through Understanding the Nature of Science (NOS): -A Proposal for a Synthetic View of the NOS-. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 27(2), 153-167
26 Lederman, N.G., and Abd-El-Khalick, F. (1998). Avoiding de-natured science: Activities that promote understandings of the nature of science. In: W.F. McComas (ed), The nature of science in history of science in science education: Rationales and strategies (p. 83), Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, Dordrecht
27 Park, Jongwon., and Kim, Doohyun. (2007). Development of comprehensive learning materials for the understanding nature of science in the context of scientific inquiry. Report No. KRF-2006-721-B00029. Korea Research Foundation, Seoul
28 Lederman, N.G. (1999). Teachers' understanding of the nature of science and classroom practice: factors that facilitate or impede the relationship. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 916-929   DOI   ScienceOn
29 American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) (1994). Project 2061: Science for All Americans. Oxford University Press, New York
30 Cartier, J.L., and Stewart, J. (2000). Teaching the nature of inquiry: Further developments in high school genetics curriculum. Science and Education, 9, 247-267   DOI   ScienceOn
31 McComas, W.F., and Olson, J.K. (1998). The nature of science in international science education standards documents. In: W.F. McComas (ed), The Nature of Science in Science Education: Rationales and Strategies (p. 41), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
32 Park, Jongwon., and Kim, Doohyun. (2008). Development of Teaching Materials for the Nature of Science and Pilot Application to Scientifically Gifted Students. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 28(2), 169-179
33 Park, Jongwon. (2008). Discussions for linking the Nature of Science (NOS) with Scientific Inquiry. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 28(7), 749-758
34 Park, Jongwon., and Han, Sooja. (2002). Deductive reasoning to promote the change of concept about force and motion. International Journal of Science Education, 24(6), 593-610   DOI   ScienceOn
35 Bel,l R., and Lederman, N.G. (2003). Understandings of the nature of science and decision making on science and technology based issues. Science Education, 87, 352-377   DOI   ScienceOn
36 Chinn, C.A., and Malhotra, B.A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating in inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86, 175-218   DOI   ScienceOn