1 |
Akerson, V.L., Morrison, J.A., and McDuffie, A.R. (2006). One course is not enough: Preservice elementary teachers' retention of improved views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(2), 194-213
DOI
ScienceOn
|
2 |
Krajcik, J., Blumenfeld, P.C., Marx, R.W., Bass, K.M., and Fredricks, J. (1998). Inquiry in projectbased science classrooms: Initial attempts by middle school students. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3&4), 313-350
DOI
ScienceOn
|
3 |
Lakatos, I. (1994). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In J. Worrall & G. Currie (Eds.), The methodology of scientific research programmes: Philosophical papers Vol.1 (pp. 8-101). New York: Cambridge University Press
|
4 |
Lederman, N.G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, G.L., and Schwartz, R.S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners' conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 497-521
DOI
ScienceOn
|
5 |
Lee, H., and Songer, N.B. (2003). Making authentic science accessible to students. International Journal of Science Education, 25(8), 923-948
DOI
|
6 |
Osborne, J., Collins, S., Ratcliffe, M., Millar, R., and Duschl, R. (2003). What "Ideas-about-Science" should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the expert community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 692-720
DOI
ScienceOn
|
7 |
Park, Jongwon, Kim, Ikgyun, Kim, Myungwhan., and Lee, Moo. (2001). Analysis of the students' processes of confirmation and falsification of the hypotheses in electrostatics. International Journal of Science Education. 23(12), 1219-1236
DOI
ScienceOn
|
8 |
Park, Jongwon, Kyoung-Ae., and Kim, Ikgyun (impress). Analysis of the Actual Processes of Physicists' Research - Proposing Authentic Process of Scientific Inquiry -. Research in Science Education
|
9 |
Rudolph, J.L. (2005). Inquiry, instrumentalism, and the public understanding of science. Science Education, 89, 803-821
DOI
ScienceOn
|
10 |
Schwartz, R.S., Lederman, N.G., and Crawford, B.A. (2004). Developing views of nature of science in an authentic context: An explicit approach to bridging the gap between nature of science and scientific inquiry. Science Education, 88, 610-645
DOI
ScienceOn
|
11 |
Vhurumuku, E., Holtman, L., Mikalsen, O., and Kolsto, S.D. (2006). An investigation of Zimbabwe high school chemistry students' laboratory work-based images of the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(2), 127-149
DOI
ScienceOn
|
12 |
Matthews, M. R. (1994). Science Teaching: The Role of History and Philosophy of Science. New York: Routledge
|
13 |
White, B.Y., and Frederiksen, J.R. (1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction, 16(1), 3-118
DOI
ScienceOn
|
14 |
Bianchini, J., and Colburn, A. (2000). Teaching the nature of science through inquiry to prospective elementary teachers: A tale of two researchers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(2), 177-209
DOI
ScienceOn
|
15 |
Park, Jongwon. (2006). Modelling Analysis of Students' Processes of Generating Scientific Explanatory Hypotheses. International Journal of Science Education. 28(5), 469-489
DOI
ScienceOn
|
16 |
Bybee, R. W. (2000). Teaching science as inquiry. In J. Minstell & R E. van Zee (Eds.), Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science (pp. 20-46). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science
|
17 |
National Science Teachers Association [NSTA] (2000). NSTA position statement: The nature of science. Document retrieved: 3/18/03. from http:// www.nsta.org/159&psid=22
|
18 |
Windschitl, M. (2004). Folk theories of "Inquiry:" How preservice teachers reproduce the discourse and practices of an atheoretical scientific method. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 481-512
DOI
ScienceOn
|
19 |
Duhem, P. (1974[1906]). The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory. New York: Atheneum
|
20 |
Song, Jinwoong, Park, Jongwon, Kwon, Sunggi., and Chung, Byunghoon. (2001). Idealization in Physics: Its types, roles and implications to physics learning. In Pinto, R., and Surinach, S. (Eds.), Physics Teacher Education Beyond 2000. (pp. 359-366). Paris: Elsevier
|
21 |
Kuhn, D., Amsel, E., and O'Loughlin, M. (1988). The development of scientific thinking skills. San Diego, CA: Academic Press
|
22 |
Alters, B. J. (1997). Whose nature of science? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 39-55
DOI
ScienceOn
|
23 |
National Research Council [NRC] (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards. from http://darwin.nap.edu/html/inquiry_addendum/ch2.html
|
24 |
Park, Jongwon. (2007). A Study of New Models for Scientific Inquiry Activity through Understanding the Nature of Science (NOS): -A Proposal for a Synthetic View of the NOS-, Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 27(2), 153-167
|
25 |
Matthews, M. R. (1998). In defense of modest goals when teaching about the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 167-174
|
26 |
Park, Jongwon., and Kim, Ikgyun. (2004). Classification of students' observational statements in science. In R. Nata (Ed.), Progress in Education, Vol.13. (pp. 139-154) NY: Nova Science Publishers, Inc
|
27 |
Khishfe, R., and Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2002). Influence of explicit and reflective versus implicit inquiry-oriented instruction on sixth graders' views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(7), 551-578
DOI
ScienceOn
|
28 |
Sandoval, W.A. (2005). Understanding students' practical epistemologies and their influence on learning through inquiry. Science Education, 89, 634-656
DOI
ScienceOn
|
29 |
Collins, H., and Pinch, T. (1998). The golem: What you should know about science (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
|
30 |
Hand, B., Prain, V., Lawrence, C. & Yore, L. D. (1999). A writing in science framework designed to improve science literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 10, 1021-1036
|
31 |
Lederman, N. G. (1998). The state of science education: subject matter without context. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 3(2). from http://unr. edu/homepage/jcannon/ejse/lederman.html
|
32 |
Park, Jongwon. (2003). An analysis of the experimental designs suggested by students for testing scientific hypotheses. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 23(3), 200-213
|
33 |
Bell, P., and Linn, M.C. (2000). Scientific arguments as learning artifacts: designing for learning from the web with KIE. International Journal of Science Education, 22(8), 797-817
DOI
|
34 |
Lederman, N. G. (1999). Teachers' understanding of the nature of science and classroom practice: factors that facilitate or impede the relationship. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 916-929
DOI
ScienceOn
|
35 |
Cartier, J.L., and Stewart, J. (2000). Teaching the nature of inquiry: Further developments in high school genetics curriculum. Science and Education, 9, 247-267
DOI
ScienceOn
|
36 |
Sandoval, W.A., and Reiser, B.J. (2004). Explanation-Driven inquiry: integrating conceptual and epistemic scaffolds for scientific inquiry. Science Education, 88, 345-372
DOI
ScienceOn
|
37 |
Zion, M., et al. (2004). Dynamic, open inquiry in biology learning. Science Education, 88, 728-753
DOI
ScienceOn
|
38 |
Bell, R. L. Blair, L. M., Crawford, B. A., andLederman, N. G. (2003). Just do it? Impact of science apprenticeship program on high school students' understanding of the nature of science and scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(5), 487-509
DOI
ScienceOn
|
39 |
Abd-El-Khalick, F., and Lederman, N. G. (2000). Improving science teachers' conceptions of nature of science: a critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 665-701
DOI
|
40 |
Toth, E.E., Suthers, D.D., and Lesgold, A. (2002). "Mapping to know": The effects of representational guidance and reflective assessment on scientific inquiry. Science Education, 86, 264-286
DOI
ScienceOn
|
41 |
Pickering, A. (1995). The mangle of practice: Time, agency, and science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
|
42 |
Park, Jongwon., and Pak, Sungjae (1997). Students' responses to experimental evidence based on perceptions of causality and availability of evidence. Journal of research in science teaching, 34(1). 57-67
DOI
ScienceOn
|
43 |
Schauble, L., Glaser, R., Duschl, R.A., Schulz, S., and John, J. (1995). Students' understanding of the objectives and procedures of experimentation in the science classroom. The Journal of the Learning Science, 4(2), 131-166
DOI
ScienceOn
|
44 |
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) (1994). Project 2061: Science for All Americans. New York: Oxford University Press
|
45 |
Bell., R., and Lederman, N.G. (2003). Understandings of the nature of science and decision making on science and technology based issues. Science Education, 87, 352-377
DOI
ScienceOn
|
46 |
Hofstein, A., and Lunetta, V.N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88, 28-54
DOI
ScienceOn
|
47 |
Chalmers, A.F. (1986). What is this thing called science? Milton Keynes: Open University Press
|
48 |
McComas, W. F., and Olson, J. K. (1998). The nature of science in international science education standards documents. In W.F. McComas (Ed.), The Nature of Science in Science Education: Rationales and Strategies (pp. 41-52). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers
|
49 |
Richmond, G., and Kurth, L.A. (1999). Moving from outside to inside: High school students' use of apprenticeship as vehicle for entering the culture and practice of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(6), 677-697
DOI
ScienceOn
|