Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2008.28.7.730

Use of Alternative Assessments to Rectify Common Students' Misconceptions: A Case Study of "mini-project" in GCE 'A' Level Physics in a Singapore School  

Lim, Ai Phing (Millennia Institute, Singapore)
Yau, Che Ming (National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education / v.28, no.7, 2008 , pp. 730-748 More about this Journal
Abstract
Students often have tenacious physics misconceptions and many studies were conducted on engendering conceptual change. Correspondingly, there is much literature on alternative assessment and its role in student learning. This is a comparison study on using alternative assessments to improve common students' misconceptions in GCE Advanced Level Physics. This research also aims to affirm alternative assessment as a valid tool for learning and promote its use. This study involved two classes with 24 students each. For four weeks, electromagnetism was taught to students using the same classroom pedagogies but with different assignments. The control group completeda standard drill-and-practice assignment while the experimental group finished an alternative assessment. From the preliminary results, students who undertook the alternative assessment and the traditional assessment both improved, however, the treatment group did not perform statistically significantly better than the control group. The reasons will be discussed and commented and it is expected to have significant improvement on rectifying misconceptionsupon next batch of experimentation groups.
Keywords
alternative assessment; conceptual change; physics; misconception;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Pinkerton, K. D. (1997). Enhancing conceptual learning by understanding levels of language-rich teaching. Chicago, IL: Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 406677)
2 Saltman, S. (1994). Assignment: write a chapter of text. The Physics Teacher, 32, 162-163   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Slater, T. F., Samson, S. L., & Ryan, J. M. (1995). A qualitative and quantitative comparison of the impact of portfolio assessment procedures versus traditional assessment in a college physics course. San Francisco, CA: Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 391835)
4 Wiggins, G. (2004). Assessment as feedback. Retrieved Sep 15, 2007, from New Horizons for Learning web site: http://www.newhorizons.org/strate gies/assess/wiggins.htm
5 Wiliam, D., & Black, P. (1998). Inside the black box: raising standards through classroom assessment. Retrieved Feb 1, 2007, from Phi Delta Kappa International Web site: http://www.pdkintl.org/kappan/ kbla9810.htm
6 Hargreaves, A., Earl, L., & Schmidt, M. (2002). Perspectives on alternative assessment reform. American Educational Research Journal, 39(1), 69-95   DOI
7 Klammer, J. (1998). An overview of techniques for identifying, acknowledging and overcoming alternate conceptions in physics education. 1997-98 Klingenstein Project Paper, (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 423121)
8 Mills, P. A., Sweeney, W. V., DeMeo, S., Marino, R., & Clarkson, S. (2000). Using poster sessions as an alternative to written examinations - the poster exam. Journal of Chemical Education, 77(9), 1158-1161   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Raduta, C. (2005). General students' misconceptions related to electricity and magnetism. Retrieved Jul 12, 2007, from Cornell University arXiv Web site: http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0503132
10 diSessa, A. A. (1993). Towards an epistemology of physics. Cognition and Instruction, 10(2 & 3), 105-225   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Notaros, B. M. (2002). Concept inventory assessment instruments for electromagnetics education. Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium, 1, 684-687
12 Kwon, J. S., Lee, Y. J., Beeth, M. E. (2000). The effects of cognitive conflict on students' conceptual change in physics. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 443734)
13 Sherin, B. (1999). Common sense clarified: intuitive knowledge and its role in physics expertise. Boston, MA: Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 444337)
14 Shepard, L. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4-14
15 Singapore Examinations and Assessment Board. GCE A Level Higher 2 (H2 Physics syllabus examined in 2008. Retrieved Aug 22, 2008, from Singapore Examinations and Assessment Board Web site: http://www.seab.gov.sg/SEAB/aLevel/syllabus/ 2008_GCE_A_Level_Syllabuses/9745_2008.pdf
16 Wiliam, D., Black, P., Lee, C., & Harrison, C. (2004). Teachers developing assessment for learning: impact on student achievement. Assessment in Education, 11, 49-65   DOI
17 Moreira, M. (1985). Concept mapping: an alternative strategy for evaluation. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 10(2), 159-168   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Ranney, M. (1987). Restructuring conceptions of motion in physics-naive students. Washington, DC: Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 357965)
19 Pearson, G., & Atkinson, D. (1995). Physics in the sonnet style. The Physics Teacher, 33, 577   DOI
20 Planinic, M. (2006). Assessment of difficulties of some conceptual areas from electricity and magnetism using the conceptual survey of electricity and magnetism. American Journal of Physics, 74(12), 1143-1148   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Niedderer, H. (1997). Learning process studies in physics: a review of concepts and results. Chicago, IL: Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 406171)
22 Berglund, A., Daniels, M., Hedenborg, M., & Tengstrand, A. (1998). Assessment to increase students' creativity: two case studies. European Journal of Engineering Education, 23(1), 45-54   DOI   ScienceOn