Browse > Article

Analysis on the Communication Processes Appeared in Coteaching  

Yoon, Ji-Hyun (Seoul National University)
Noh, Tae-Hee (Seoul National University)
Han, Jae-Young (Chungbuk National University)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education / v.28, no.2, 2008 , pp. 159-168 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to apply the coteaching to the teaching practice of the student-teachers and identify the distinctive characteristics of the communication processes appeared in coteaching. We developed the semiotic analyzing-frame and observed 7 classes of middle schools where the student-teachers cotaught one or two units. Then we analyzed the communication processes on the view of semiotics. We found three patterns of the communication processes. First, when there was a discontinuous communication between the student-teacher and the students, the communication was restarted by the other student-teacher leading to the complete meaning making. Second, when an insufficient communication took place by the student-teacher using inadequate interpretant, the other student-teacher modified the communication by selecting another interpretant including sufficient meaning towards the object. With this new interpretant, students could refine the imperfect private meanings and eventually establish the more objective meanings. Third, the communication was pre-planned between coteachers to help students understand the contents through the successful translation of interpretants. Coteaching provided positive implications to improve the communication processes in science lesson.
Keywords
coteaching; communication; semiotics;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 성숙경, 최병순(2007). 과학 실험에서 교사-모둠학생의 언어적 상호작용 사례 연구. 대한화학회지, 51(4), 375-386   DOI
2 정은영, 홍미영(2004). 초등학교 과학과 실험 및 관찰 수업 사례에서 나타난 수업의 문제점: 도시 지역의 수업 사례를 중심으로. 한국초등과학교육학회지, 23(4), 287-296
3 Roth, W.-M., & Tobin, K. (2001). The implications of coteaching/cogenerative dialogue for teacher evaluation: Learning from multiple perspectives of everyday practice. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 15, 7-29   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Roth, W.-M., Tobin, K., Carambo, C., & Dalland, C. (2005). Coordination in Coteaching: Producing Alignment in Real Time. Science Education, 89(4), 675-702   DOI   ScienceOn
5 민병위(2001). 기호의 '의미와 커뮤니케이션'에 대한 논의(I) (퍼어스계의 기호론자들) -기호의 '외연과 내포'에 대한 논의를 중심으로-. 인문논총, 14, 37-56
6 소연희(2006). 효과적인 교실수업에 영향을 미치는 요인 탐색. 교육방법연구, 18(1), 1-22
7 Pierce, C. S. (1931-1958). Collected papers, Cambridge (Mass): Harvard University Press
8 한재영(2005). 코티칭(coteaching): 새로운 교육실습 방식. 교육연구논총, 26(3), 49-69
9 Griffiths, A. K., & Preston, K. R. (1992). Grade-12 students' misconceptions relating to fundamental characteristics of atoms and molecules. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(6), 611-628   DOI
10 노태희, 윤미숙, 강훈식, 한재영(2007). 중학교 3학 년 과학 교과서에서 원자 및 분자 개념을 표상한 시각 자료의 기호학적 분석. 대한화학회지, 51(5), 423-432   DOI
11 최경희, 박종윤, 최병순, 남정희, 최경순, 이기순(2004). 중학교 과학 수업에서 교사와 학생의 언어적 상호작용 분석. 한국과학교육학회지, 24(6), 1039-1048
12 Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press
13 조창연(2002). 디지털 시대의 제품 의미 생성 작용에 대한 광고 기호학적 접근-소쉬르와 퍼스의 기호학과 그 관점을 넘어서. 한국기호학회, 12, 244-285
14 Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (2003) Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. MaidenheadPhiladelphia: Open University Press
15 Roth, W.-M., Tobin, K., Carambo, C., & Dalland, C. (2004). Coteaching: Creating resources for learning and learning to teach chemistry in urban high schools. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(9), 882-904   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Saenz-Ludlow, A. (2006). Classroom interpreting games with an illustration. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61, 183-218   DOI
17 Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage