Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2007.27.9.870

Change and Characteristics of Interactions in a Heterogeneous Group in Scientific Inquiry Experiments  

Seong, Suk-Kyoung (Seocho High School)
Choi, Byung-Soon (Korea National University of Education)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education / v.27, no.9, 2007 , pp. 870-880 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to understand the change and characteristics of interactions in a heterogeneous group in scientific inquiry experiments. For this purpose, the process of students' interactions in small group activities were analyzed. This study focused on two, small heterogeneous groups of eighth graders. Students were involved in 13 scientific inquiry experiments for one year and students' interactions in each experiments were observed and recorded using video/audio and the data recorded were transcribed. The analysis of data was based on the method of making a note by looking and listening to the data repeatedly. Students' interactions in heterogeneous group changed toward that 3A (early formal operation student solved the problems by oneself and other students only listened to 3A student's explanation or copied the answer. The least able student was alienated from peers' interactions. In the meantime, new interactions of two middle level students were shaped. Educational implications of the progression of activities emphasizing interactions and the organization of grouping were drawn.
Keywords
heterogeneous group; inquiry experiment; social interactions;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 5  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 강순민 (2004). 과학적 맥락의 논의 과제 해결과정에서 나타나는 논의과정 요소의 특정. 한국교원대학교 박사학위논문
2 김지영, 성숙경, 강성주, 박종윤, 최병순 (2002). 사회적 상호작용을 강조한 과학탐구실혐의 효과. 한국과학교육학회지. 22(4), 757-767
3 김찬종, 오필석, 오영선, 박영선 (2005). 포트폴리오 체제를 적용한 수업에서 학생들의 소집단내 상호삭용 참여 양상과 포트폴리오 성취도와의 관계. 한국과학교육학회지, 25( 7), 837-848
4 성숙경 (2005). 사회적 상호작용을 강조한 과학탐구 실험에서 언어적 상호작용의 변화와 특성. 한국교원대학교 박사학위논문
5 Berg, C., Bergendahl, V., Lundberg. B., & Tibell, L.(2003). Benefiting from an open-ended experirnent? A comparison of attitude to, and outcomes of, and expository versus open-inquiry version of the same experiment. International Journal of Science Education, 25(3). 351-372   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Chang, H. P., & Lederman. N. G. (1994). The effects of lewis of cooperation with in physical science achieveroent. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(2), 167-181   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Solomon, .J. (1998), About argument and discussion School Science Review, 80(291), 57-62
8 Wasron, S. B., & Mashall, J. E. (1995). Effects of cooperative incentives am heterogeneous arrangement on achievement and interactio: of cooperative learning groups in a college life science course, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(3), 281-299
9 Yerrick, F. K, Dostes. E., Mugent, J. S., Parke, H, & Carwley, F. E. (2003) Social interaction and the use of analogy: An analysis of preservice teachers' talk during physics inquiry lessons. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(5), 443-463   DOI   ScienceOn
10 김조연, 신애경, 박국태, 최병순 (2001). 사회적 상호작용을 강조한 과학탐구실험의 효과 및 인지수준에 따른 상호작용 분석. 대한화학회지, 45(5), 470 -480
11 Lumpe, A. T., & Styer, .J. R. (1995). Peer collaboration and concept develpment: Learning about photosynthesis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(1), 71-98   DOI   ScienceOn
12 박종윤, 정인화, 남정희, 최경희, 최병순 (2006). 중학교 과학 수업에서 질문과 피드백을 활용한 교사-학생 상호작용 강화 수업 전략의 개발 및 적용. 한국과학교육학회지, 26(2), 239-245
13 Lee, S. K., Park, H.J., Myeong, K. O., & Kang, K. H. (2003). A case stud of classroom cultural aspects affecting discussion and discourse; A conceptual ecological approach. Journal of Korean Association Research in Science Education, 23(4), 331-340
14 Shepardson, D. P. (1996). Social interactions and the mediation of science learn ug in two small groups of firstgraders. Journal of Reserch in Science Teaching, 33(2), 159-178   DOI
15 Richmond, G., & Strdey. J. (1996). Making meaning in classroorns: Social proceses in small-group discourse and scientific knowledge building. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(8),839-858   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Jones, M. G. & Carter, G. (1994). Verbal and nonverbal behavior of al: ility grouped dyads. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(6),603-619   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Lunetta, V. M. (1998). The school science laboratory History perspectives and cntext of contemporary teaching, In B. J Fraser, & K.G. Tobin (Eds). International Handbook of science education (pp. 249-262). London Kluwer Academic Publishers
18 김혜심, 이은경, 강성주 (2006) 실생활 소재 탐구 실험 형태에 따른 학생 학생 상호작용에서의 학습 접근 수준 분석. 한국과학교육학회지, 26(1), 16-24
19 Bianchini, J. A. (1997), Where knowledge construction, equity and context intersect: Student learning of science in small groups. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(10), 1039-1065   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Hand. B., Treagust, D.F., & Vance, K. (1997).Student perceptions of the social constructivist classroom. Science Education, 81(5), 561-575   DOI   ScienceOn
21 이현영, 장상실, 성숙경, 강성주, 최병순 (2002). 사회적 상호작용을 강조한 과학탐구 실험과정에서 학생학생 상호작용 양상 분석. 한국과학교육학회지, 22(3), 660-670
22 Anderson, R., Howe, C.. Soden, F, Holliday, J., & Low. J. (2001), Peer interaction and the learning of critical thinking skills in further education students, Instructional Science, 29, 1-32   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Chinn, C.A., & Malhotra, B. A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluation inquiry task. Science Education, 886, 175-218
24 Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case: study applications in edu.ation, San-Francisco: Jessey-Bass Publishers
25 Alexopoulou, E., & Driver, R. (1996). Small-group discussion in physics: Peer interaction modes in peers & fours. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(10), 1099-1114   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Hodson, D. K. (1990). A critical look at practical work in school science. School Science Review, 71 (256).33-40
27 Tien, L. T., Roth, M, & Kanipmeier, J. A. (2002).Implementation of a peeled team learning instructional approach in an undergra luate organic chemistry course. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(7), 606-632   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Kurth, L. A.,. Gardner, R., & Smith, E. L. (2002). Student use of narrative and paradigmatic forms of talk in elementary science conersations, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(9), 93-818