Browse > Article

Rethinking K-6 Scientific literacy: A Case Study of Using Science Books as Tool to Cultivate a Fundamental Sense of Scientific Literacy  

Kim, Mi-Jung (Seoul National University)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education / v.27, no.8, 2007 , pp. 711-723 More about this Journal
Abstract
As the discourse of scientific literacy has broadly summed up the goals of science education in the current decade, this study attempts to question how we contextualize appropriate interpretations and feasible approaches to scientific literacy in K-6 science education. With respect to the complex praxis of scientific knowledge and practice, this study emphasizes the participatory framework of scientific literacy which interweaves children's everyday experiences and science learning. This study also concerns children's abilities to understand and enact scientific enterprises (i.e., children's fundamental sense of scientific literacy). As a way of developing K-6 scientific literacy, this study investigates how using science books can broaden the scope of children's understandings of science in life connections and promote a fundamental sense of scientific literacy through talking, reading, and writing skills in Grade two science classrooms in Canada. Second graders were engaged in learning "sound" for five weeks. During science lessons, children's talks were recorded and their writings were collected for data interpretation. This research finds that using science books can encourage children to become engaged in communicative activities such as talking, reading, and writing in science; furthermore, using science books develops children's inquiry skills. These findings open a further discussion on scientific literacy at the K-6 levels.
Keywords
K-6 scientific literacy; science talks and writing; science books; children's inquiry skills;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Aikenhead, G. (1994): What is STS Science Teaching? In J. Solomon & G. Aikenhead (Eds.), STS education: International perspectives on reform, (pp. 47-59). New York & London: Teachers College Columbia University
2 Aikenhead, G. (2006). Science education for everyday life: Evidence-based practice. New York: Teachers College Press
3 Galbraith, P., Carss, M., Grice, R., Endean, L., & Warry, M. (1997). Toward scientific literacy for the third millennium: a view from Australia. International journal of science education, 19(4), 447-467   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Hand, B., Prain, V., Lawrence, C., & Yore, L. (1999). A writing in science framework designed to enhance science literacy. International journal of science education, 21(10), 1021-1035   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Keys, C. (1999). Revitalizing instruction on scientific genres: connecting knowledge production in the writing to learn in science. Science education 83(1), 115-130   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Pedretti, E. (2003). Teaching science, technology, society and environment (STSE) education. In D. Zeidler (Ed.), The role of moral reasoning on socioscientific issues and discourse in science education (pp. 219-240). Dordrecht, Boston, & London: Kluwer Academic Publishers
7 Shamos, M. (1995). The myth of scientific literacy. New Brunswick & New Jersey: Rutgers University Press
8 Song, J. (2006). Humanistic science education thorough context-rich approaches. Journal of Korean elementary science education, 25(4), 383-395
9 Solomon, J. (1993). Teaching science, technology and society. Buckingham & Philadelphia: Open University Press
10 Norris, S. & Phillips, L. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87(2), 224-240   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Zimmermam, C., Bisanz, G., Bisanz, J., Klein, J., & Klein, P. (2001). Science at the supermarket: a comparison of what appears in the popular press, experts' advice to readers, and what students what to know. Public understanding of science, 10, 37-58   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Zeidler, D., Walker, K., Ackett, W., & Simmons, M. (2002). Tangled up in views: Beliefs in the nature of science and responses to socicoscientific dilemmas. Science education, 86(3), 343-367   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R. & Scott, P. (1996). Young people's images of science. Buckingham & Philadelphia: Open University Press
14 Hurd, P. (2002). Modernizing science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 39(1), 3-9   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Rennie, L. & Jarvis, T. (1995). Children's choice of drawings to communicate their ideas about technology. Research in science education, 25(3), 239-252   DOI
16 Kolsto, S (2000). Consensus projects: teaching science for citizenship. International journal of science education, 22(6), 654-664
17 Roth, W-M. & Desautels, J. (2004). Educating for citizenship: Reappraising the role of science education. Canadian Journal of science, mathematics and technology education, 4(2), 149-168   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Bybee, R. W. (1997). Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practices. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann
19 Hand, B. & Keys, C. (1999). Inquiry investigation: a new approach to laboratory reports. The science teacher, 66, 27-29
20 Yager, R. (2000). A vision for what science education should be like for the first 25 years of a new millennium. School Science & Mathematics, 100(6), 327-342   DOI   ScienceOn
21 DeBoer, G. (2000). Scientific literacy: another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 582-601   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Hurd, P. (1998). Scientific literacy: New minds for a changing world. Science education, 82(3), 407 -416   DOI   ScienceOn
23 National Resource Center (1997). Science for All Children: A Guide to Improving Elementary Science Education in Your School District. Washington DC: National Academy Press
24 Roberts, D. (1983). Scientific literacy: Towards balance in setting goals for school science programs. Toronto: Guidance Centre, University of Toronto
25 Fleming, R. (1989). Literacy for a technological age. Science Education, 73(4), 391-404   DOI
26 Hand, B. & Prain, V. (2003). Teachers implementing writing to learn strategies in junior secondary science: a case study. Science education, 86(6), 737-755   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Hodson, D. (2003), Time for action: science education for an alternative future. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 645-670   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Wheatly, G. (1991). Constructivist perspectives on science and mathematics learning. Science education, 75(1), 9-21   DOI
29 Zeidler, D., Sadler, T., Simmons, M., & Howes E. (2005). Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socioscientific issues education. Science Education, 89(3), 357-377   DOI   ScienceOn
30 Blades, D. (1995). Procedures of power in a curriculum-discourse: Conversations from home. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 11(4), 125-155
31 Falk, J. (2001). Free-choice science learning: Framing the discussion. In J. Falk (Ed.), Free-choice science education (pp. 3-20), New York: Teachers College Press
32 Gallas, K. (1995). Talking their way into science: hearing children's questions and theories, responding with curricula. New York: Teachers College Press
33 Roberts, D. (1995). Building companion meanings into school science programs. Nordisk Pedagogik, 15(2), 108-124
34 Yore, L., Bisanz, G., & Hand, B. (2003). Examining the literacy component of science literacy: 25 years of language arts and science research. International journal of science education, 25(6), 689-725   DOI   ScienceOn
35 Zimmermam, C., Bisanz, G., & Bisanz, J. (1998). Everyday scientific literacy: Do students use information about the social context and methods of research to evaluate news briefs about science? The Alberta journal of educational research, XLIV(2), 188-207
36 Hand, B., Alvermann, D., Gee, J., Guzzetti, B., Norris, S., Philips, L., Prain, V., & Yore, L. (2003). Message from the 'Island Group': what is literacy in science literacy? Journal of research in science teaching, 40(7), 607-615   DOI   ScienceOn
37 Kolsto, S. (2001). Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues. Science education, 85(3), 291-310   DOI   ScienceOn
38 Jenkins, E. (2000). 'Science for all': times for a paradigm shift? In R. Miller (Ed.), Improving science education: the contribution of research (pp. 207-226). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press
39 Blades, D. (1997). Procedures of power and curriculum change: Foucault and the quest for possibilities in science education. New York: Peter Lang