1 |
Cosgrove, M., & Osborne, R. (1981). Physical change (Working Paper 26): Learning in science project. Unpublished manuscript, Hamilton, N.Z
|
2 |
Edens, K. M., & Potter, E. F. (2001). Promoting conceptual understanding through pictorial representation. Studies in Art Education, 42(3), 214-233
DOI
ScienceOn
|
3 |
Gabel, D., Samuel, K. V., & Hunn, D. (1987). Understanding the particulate nature of matter. Journal of Chemical Education, 64(8), 695-697
DOI
|
4 |
Johnstone, A. H. (1991). Why is science difficult to learn? Things are seldom what they seem. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 7, 75-83
DOI
|
5 |
Kang, H., Kim, B., & Noh, T. (2005). Drawing and writing as methods to assist students in connecting and integrating external representations in learning the particulate nature of matter with multiple representations. Journal of Korea Association of Research in Science Education. 25(4), 533-540
|
6 |
Keig, P. F., & Rubba, P. A. (1993). Translation of representations of the structure of matter and its relationship to reasoning, gender, spatial reasoning, and specific prior knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(8), 883-903
DOI
ScienceOn
|
7 |
Krajcik, J. S. (1991). Developing students understanding of chemical concepts. In S. M. Glynn, R. H. Yeany & B. K. Britton (Eds.), The psychology of learning science (pp. 117-147). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
|
8 |
Laverty, D. T., & McGarvey, J. E. B. (1991). A 'constructivist' approach to learning. Education in Chemistry, 28(4), 99-102
|
9 |
Lemke, J. (2001). Articulating communities: Sociocultural perspectives on science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(3), 296-316
DOI
ScienceOn
|
10 |
Noh, T., & Jeon, K. (1997). The instructional effect of a four-stage problem solving approach visually emphasizing the molecular level of matter upon students' conceptions and problem solving ability. Journal of Korea Association of Research in Science Education, 17(3), 313-312
|
11 |
Noh, T., & Scharmann, L. C. (1997). Instructional influence of a molecular-level pictorial presentation of matter on students' conceptions and problem-solving ability. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(2), 199-217
DOI
ScienceOn
|
12 |
Prieto, T., Blanco, A., & Rodriguez, A. (1989). The ideas of 11 to 14 year old students about the nature of solutions. International Journal of Science Education, 11(4), 451-463
DOI
ScienceOn
|
13 |
Raviolo, A. (2001). Assessing students' conceptual understanding of solubility equilibrium. Journal of Chemical Education, 78(5), 629-631
DOI
ScienceOn
|
14 |
Renstroem, L., Andersson, B., & Marton, F. (1990). Students' conceptions of matter. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(3), 555-569
DOI
|
15 |
Schollum, B. (1981). Chemical change (Working Paper 27): Learning in science project. Hamilton, New Zealand: University of Waikato
|
16 |
Shavelson, R. J., Baxter, G., & Pine, J. (1991). Performance assessment in science. Applied Measurement in Education, 4(4), 347-362
DOI
ScienceOn
|
17 |
Wu, H-K., Krajcik, J. S., & Soloway, E. (2001). Promoting understanding of chemical representations: students' use of a visualization tool in the classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(7), 821-842
DOI
ScienceOn
|
18 |
Boo, H.-K., & Watson, J. R. (2001). Progression in high school students' (Aged 16-18) conceptualizations about chemical reactions in solution. Science Education, 85, 568-585
DOI
ScienceOn
|
19 |
Yarroch, W. L. (1985). Student understanding of chemical equation balancing. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22(5), 449-459
DOI
|
20 |
Ben-Zvi, R., Eylon, B.-S., & Silberstein, J. (1987). Students' visulisation of a chemical reation. Education in Chemistry, 117-120
|
21 |
Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211-227
DOI
|
22 |
Noh, T., & You, J., & Han, J. (2003). The effect of molecular level drawing-based instruction. Journal of Korea Association of Research in Science Education, 23(6), 609-616
|
23 |
Driver, R., Squires, A., Rushworth, P., & Wood-Robinson, V. (1994). Making sense of secondary science: Research into children's ideas. London, New York: Routledge
|
24 |
Kozma, R., Chin, E., Russell, J., & Marx, N. (2000). The roles of representations and tools in the chemistry laboratory and their implications for chemistry learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(2), 105-144
DOI
ScienceOn
|
25 |
Williamson, V. M., & Abraham, M. R. (1995). The effects of computer animation on the particulate mental models of college chemistry students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(5), 521-534
DOI
ScienceOn
|
26 |
Dove, J. E., Everett, L. A., & Preece, P. F. W. (1999). Exploring a hydrological concepts through children's drawings. International Journal of Science Education, 21(5), 485-497
DOI
ScienceOn
|
27 |
Ebenezer, J. V., & Gaskell, P. J. (1995). Relational conceptual change in solution chemistry. Science Education, 79(1), 1-17
DOI
ScienceOn
|
28 |
Stavridou, H., & Solomounidou, C. (1989). Physical phenomena-chemical phenomena: Do pupils make the distinction? International Journal of Science Education, 11, 83-92
DOI
ScienceOn
|
29 |
Lesh, R., Post, T., & Behr, M. (1987). Representations and translation among representations in mathematics learning and problem solving. In C. Janvier (Ed.), Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 33-40). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
|
30 |
Burke, K. A., Greenbowe, T. J., & Windschitl, M. A. (1998). Developing and using conceptual computer animations for chemistry instruction. Journal of Chemical Education, 75(12), 1658-1661
DOI
|
31 |
Johnstone, A. H. (1982). Macro and micro chemistry. School Science Review, 64(227), 377-379
|
32 |
Ebenezer, J. V., & Erickson, G. L. (1996). Chemistry students' conceptions of solubility: A phenomenography. Science Education, 80(2), 181-201
DOI
|
33 |
Kozma, R., Russell, J., Jones, T., Marx, N., & Davis, J. (1996). The use of multiple, linked representations to facilitate science understanding. In R. G. S. Vosniadou, E. DeCorte, & H. Mandel (Eds.), International perspective on the psychological foundations of technology-based learning environments (pp. 41-60). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
|
34 |
Miles, M., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An Expanded sourcebook. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks
|
35 |
Nurrenbem, S., & Pickering, M. (1987). Concept learning versus problem solving: Is there a difference? Journal of Chemical Education, 64(6), 508-509
DOI
|
36 |
Kang, H., & Noh, T. (2006). The influence of situational interst, attention, and cognitive effort on drawing as a method to assist students to connect and integrate multiple external representations. Journal of Korea Association of Research in Science Education. 26(4), 510-517
|
37 |
Gabel, D. (1993). Use of the particle nature of matter in developing conceptual understanding. Journal of Chemical Education, 70(3), 193-194
DOI
ScienceOn
|
38 |
Griffiths, A. K., & Preston, K. R. (1992). Grade-12 students' misconceptions relating to fundamental characteristics of atoms and molecules. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(6), 611-628
DOI
|
39 |
Kozma, R. (2000). The use of multiple representations and the social construction of understanding in chemistry. In M. J. R. Kozma (Ed.), Innovations in science and mathematics education: Advance designs for technologies of learning (pp. 11-46). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
|
40 |
Driver, R. (1985). Beyond appearance: The conservation of matter under physical and 6chemical transformations. In R. Driver, E. Guesne & A. Tiberghien (Eds.), Children's ideas in science (1 ed., pp. 145-169). Philadelphia: Open University Press
|
41 |
Jones, T., & Berger, C. (1995, April). Students' use of multimedia science instruction: The MTV generation? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Francisco
|
42 |
Ault, A. (2001). How to say how much: Amounts and stoichiometry. Journal of Chemical Education, 78(10), 1347-1349
DOI
ScienceOn
|
43 |
Randell, S. (1995). Generating thinking-aloud protocols: Impacts on the narrative writing of college students. American Journal of Psychology, 108(1), 89-98
DOI
ScienceOn
|
44 |
Fensham, N., & Fensham, P. (1987). Descriptions and frameworks of solutions and rections in solutions. Research in Science Education, 17, 139-148
DOI
|
45 |
Magnusson, S. J., Templin, M., & Boyle, R. A. (1997). Dynamic science assessment: A new approach for investigating conceptual change. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6(1), 91-142
DOI
ScienceOn
|
46 |
Kozma, R., & Russell, J. (1997). Multimedia and understanding: Expert and novice responses to different representations of chemical phenomena. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 949-968
DOI
ScienceOn
|
47 |
Wu, H-K., & Shah, P. (2004). Exploring visuospatial thinking in chemistry learning. Science Education, 88(3), 456-492
|
48 |
Ardac, D., & Akaygun, S. (2004). Effectiveness of multimedia-based instruction that emphasizes molecular representations on students' understanding of chemical change. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(4), 317-337
DOI
ScienceOn
|
49 |
Brosnan, T., & Reynolds, Y. (2001). Students' explanations of chemical phenomena: Macro and micro differences. Research in Science and Technological Education, 19(1), 69-78
DOI
ScienceOn
|
50 |
Gabel, D. (1998). The complexity of chemistry and implications for teaching. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International Handbook of Science Education (pp. 233-249). London: Kluwer Academic Press
|
51 |
Schank, P., & Kozma, R. (2002). Learning chemistry through the use of a representation-based knowledge building environment. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 21(3), 253-279
|
52 |
Lee, S-Y. (2005). Investigating student's understandings of light using Dynamic Science Assessment method. Journal of Korean Science Education, 25(1), 41-56
|
53 |
Weber, R. (1990). Basic content analysis: Quantitative applications in the social sciences. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks
|
54 |
Gabel, D., Briner, D., & Haines, D. (1992). Modeling with magnets: A unified approach to chemistry problem solving. The Science Teacher, 59(Mar), 58-63
|
55 |
Bowen, C. W. (1990). Representational systems used by graduate students while preblem solving in organic synthesis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(4), 351-370
DOI
|
56 |
Nussbaum, J. (1985). The particulate nature of matter in the gaseous phase. In R. Driver, E. Guesne & A. Tiberghien (Eds.), Children's ideas in science. Milton Keynes: Open University Press
|
57 |
Pozo, J. I., Gomez C., & Miguel A. (2005). The embodied nature of implicit theories: The consistency of ideas about the nature of matter. Cognition & Instruction, 23(3), 351-387
DOI
ScienceOn
|
58 |
Roth, W. M., & McGinn, M. (1998). Inscriptions: Toward a theory of representing as a social practice. Review of Educational Research, 68, 35-59
DOI
ScienceOn
|
59 |
Singer, J. E., Wu, H-K., & Tal, R. (2003). Students' understanding of the particulate nature of matter. School Science and Mathematics, 103(1), 28-44
DOI
ScienceOn
|
60 |
Han, J. Y., Lee, J. Y., Kwack, J. H., & Noh, T. (2006). The effects of drawing and analyzing pictures in concept learning of the particulate nature of matter: A comparison based on student visual learning style. Journal of Korea Association of Research in Science Education. 26(1), 9-15
|
61 |
Sanger, M. J., & Greenbowe, T. J. (2000). Addressing student misconceptions concerning electron flow in aqueous solutions with instruction including computer animations and conceptual change strategies. International Journal of Science Education, 22(5), 521-537
DOI
ScienceOn
|
62 |
Unsworth, L. (2001). Evaluating the language of different types of explanations in junior high school science texts. International Journal of Science Education, 23(6), 585-609
DOI
ScienceOn
|