1 |
Ben-Zvi, R., Eylon, B., & Silberstein, J. (1986). Is an atom of copper malleable? Journal of Chemical Education, 63(1), 64-66
DOI
|
2 |
Dori, Y.J. & Barak, M. (2001). Virtual and physical molecular modeling: Fostering model perception and spatial understanding. Educational Technology & Society, 4(1), 1-14
|
3 |
Gilbert, J. K., Boulter, C. J., & Rutherford, M. (2000). Explanations with models in science education. In J. K. Gilbert & C. J. Boulter (Eds.), Developing models in science education (pp. 193-208). Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher
|
4 |
Hardwicke, A. J. (1995). Using molecular models to teach chemistry. School Science Review, 77(278), 47-56
|
5 |
Harrison, A. G. & Treagust, D.F. (1996). Secondary students' mental models of atoms and molecules: Implications for teaching chemistry. Science Education, 80(5), 509-534
DOI
ScienceOn
|
6 |
Head, J., Bucat, R., Mocerino, M., & Treagust, D. (2004). Exploring students' abilities to use two different styles of structural representation in organic chemistry. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the national Association for research in Science Teaching, Vancouver, Canada
|
7 |
Kozma, R. B., Chin, E., Russell, J., & Marz, N. (2000). The roles of representations and tools in the chemistry laboratory and their implications for chemistry Learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(2), 105-143
DOI
ScienceOn
|
8 |
Noh, T & Scharmann, L. C. (1997) Instructional influence of a molecular-level pictorial presentation of matter on students' conceptions and problem-solving ability. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(2), 199-217
DOI
ScienceOn
|
9 |
Peterson, Q.R. (1970). Some reflections on the use and abuse of molecular models. Journal of Chemical Education, 47(1), 24-29
DOI
|
10 |
Tasker, D. & Dalton, R. (2006). Research into practice: Visualization of the molecular world using animations. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 7(2), 141-159
DOI
|
11 |
Wu, H. K., Krajcik, l S., & Soloway, E. (2001). Promoting understanding of chemical representations: Students' use of a visualization tool in the classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(7), 821-842
DOI
ScienceOn
|
12 |
Zare, R. N. (2002). Visualizing Chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 79(11), 1290-1291
DOI
ScienceOn
|
13 |
Zieba, M.L., Bucat, B., Mocerino, M.,& Treagust, D. (2002). Teaching, learning and reaction mechanism. Paper presented at the 33rd Annual Conference of the Australasian Science Education Research Association, Townsville, Queensland
|
14 |
Johnstone, A. H. (2000). Teaching of chemistry: logical or psychological? Chemistry Education Research and Practice in Europe, 1(1), 9-15
DOI
|
15 |
Lemke, J. (1998). Multiplying meaning: visual and verbal semiotics in scientific text. In J. R. Martin & R. Veel (Eds.), Reading science: functional perspectives on discourses of science (pp. 87-113). London: Routledge
|
16 |
Kozma, B. (2000). The use of multiple representations and the social construction of understanding in chemistry. In M. J. R. Kozma (Ed.), Innovations in science and mathematics education: Advance designs for technologies of learning (pp. 11-24). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
|
17 |
Kozma R. B. & Russell, J. (1997). Multimedia and understanding: Expert and novice responses to different representations of chemical phenomena. Journal of research in science teaching, 34(9), 949-968
DOI
ScienceOn
|
18 |
ColI R.K. & Treagust D.F., (2001), Learners' mental models of chemical bonding, Research in Science Education, 31 (3), 357-382
DOI
ScienceOn
|
19 |
Treagust, D. F. & Harrison, A. G. (1999). The genesis of effective scientific explanations for the classroom. In lLoughran (ed.), researching teaching: Methodologies and practices for understanding pedagogy (pp. 28-43). London: Palmer Press
|
20 |
Johnstone, A. H. (1993). The development of chemistry teaching: A changing response to changing demand. Journal of Chemical Education, 70(9), 701 -704
DOI
ScienceOn
|
21 |
Zieba, M.L. (2004). Teaching and learning about reaction mechanisms in organic chemistry. Unpublished thesis, University of Western Australia
|
22 |
Khan, S. (2005). Constructing Visualizable Models in Chemistry. Paper presented at the American Education Research Association Conference, Montreal, 11 th-15th, April
|
23 |
Grosslight, L., Unger, C., Jay, E. & Smith, C.L. (1991). Understanding models and their use in science: Conceptions of middle and high school students and experts. Journal of Research In Science Teaching. 28(9). 799-822
DOI
|
24 |
Meislick, H., Nechamkin, H., & Sharfkin, J. (2000). Organic chemistry. New York: Hill McGraw
|
25 |
Chittleborough, G. & Treagust, D. F. (2007). The modelling ability of non major chemistry students and their understanding of the sub-microscopic level. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8 (3), 274-292
DOI
|
26 |
Gilbert, J.K. & Boulter, C. (2001). Developing models in science education. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher
|
27 |
Harrison A.G., (2001). Textbooks for outcomes science: a review, The Queensland Science Teacher, 27, 20-22
|
28 |
Bodner, G. M. & Domin, D. S. (2000). Mental models: the role of representations in problem solving in chemistry. University Chemistry Education, 4(1), 24-30
|
29 |
Jones, L.L., Jordan, K.D., & Stillings, N.A. (2005). Molecular visualization in chemical education: The role of multidisciplinary collaboration. Chemical Education Research and Practice, 6(3), 136-149
DOI
|
30 |
Marquez, C., Izquierdo, M. & Spinet, M. (2006). Multimodal science teachers' discourse in modeling the water cycle. International Journal of Science Education, 90(2), 202-226
|
31 |
Han, J. & Roth, W.M. (2005). Chemical inscriptions in Korean textbooks: Semiotics of macro and microworld. Science Education, 90(2),173-201
DOI
ScienceOn
|
32 |
McMurry, J. (1992). Organic chemistry: 3rd edition. Wadsworth: Cole Publishing Company
|
33 |
Nyle, M. J. (1993). From chemical philosophy to theoretical chemistry. Berkeley: University of California Press
|
34 |
Wu, H. K. (2003). Linking the microscopic view of chemistry to real-life experiences: Intertextuality in a high-school science classroom. Science Education, 87(6), 868-891
DOI
ScienceOn
|
35 |
Ferk, V. & Vrtacnik, M. (2003). Students' understanding of molecular structure representations. International Journal of Science Education. 25(10), 1227-1245
DOI
ScienceOn
|
36 |
Griffiths, A. K, & Preston, K R. (1992). Grade-12 Students' misconceptions relating to fundamental characteristics of atoms and molecules. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(6), 611-628
DOI
|
37 |
Jordan, B. & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(1), 39-103
DOI
ScienceOn
|
38 |
Wu, H. K. & Shah, P. (2004). Exploring visuospatial thinking in chemistry learning. Science Education, 88(3), 465-492
DOI
ScienceOn
|
39 |
Gilbert, J.K., Jong, O. D., Justi, R. & Treagust, D. F. (2002). Chemical education: Towards research based practice. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers
|
40 |
Treagust, D. F., Chittleborough, G. D., & and Mamiala, T. L. (2004). Students' understanding of the descriptive and predictive nature of teaching models in organic chemistry. Research in Science Education, 34(1), 1-20
DOI
ScienceOn
|
41 |
Ingham A.I. and Gilbert J.K., (1991), The use of analogue models by students of chemistry at higher education level, International Journal of Science Education, 13, 203-215
DOI
ScienceOn
|
42 |
Habraken, C. (1996). Perceptions of chemistry: Why is the common perception of Chemistry, the most visual of sciences, so distorted? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 27(5), 193-201
|
43 |
Jones, M. B. (2001). Molecular modelling in the undergraduate chemistry curriculum. Journal of Chemical Education, 78(7), 867-868
DOI
ScienceOn
|
44 |
Chang, H. Y., Scott, L. A., Quintana, C., & Krajcik, J. (2004). Chemation: classroom impact of a handheld chemistry modeling and animation tool. Proceeding of the 2004 conference on Interaction design and children: building a community (p. 119 -120). Maryland, USA
|
45 |
Copolo, C.F. & Hounshell, P.B. (1995). Using three dimensional models to teach molecular structures in high school chemistry. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 4(4), 295-305
DOI
|
46 |
Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. Amercian Anthropologist, 96, 606-633
DOI
ScienceOn
|
47 |
Ochs, E., Gonzales, P., & Jacoby, S. (1996). 'When I come down I'm in the domain state': grammar and graphic representation in the interpretive activity of physicists. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, & SA Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 328-369). New York: Cambridge University press
|