1 |
Hanson, N. R. (1961). Patterns of discovery: An inquiry into the conceptual foundations of science. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press
|
2 |
Hodson, D. (1998). Is this really what scientists do? In J. Wellington (Ed.), Practical work in school science: Which way now? (pp. 93-108). London: Routledge
|
3 |
Lederman, N. G. (1998). The state of science education: subject matter without context. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 3(2). from http://unr. edu/homepage/j cannon/ejse/lederman .html
|
4 |
McComas, W. F. (1998). The principal elements of the nature of science: Dispelling the myths. In W.F. McComas (Ed.), The Nature of Science in Science Education: Rationales and Strategies (pp. 53-70). Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers
|
5 |
National Research Council [NRC]. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards. from http://darwin.nap.edulhtml/inquiry_addendum/ch2.html
|
6 |
Park, Jongwon. (2006). Modelling Analysis of Students' Processes of Generating Scientific Explanatory Hypotheses. International Journal of Science Education. 28(5), 469-489
DOI
ScienceOn
|
7 |
Ping-Kee Tao. (2003). Eliciting and developing junior secondary students' understanding of the nature of science through a peer collaboration instruction in science stories. International Journal of Science Education, 25(2), 147-171
DOI
ScienceOn
|
8 |
Roehig G.H. and Luft, J.A (2005). Constraints experienced by beginning secondary science teachers in implementing scientific inquiry lessons. International Journal of Science Education, 26(1), 3-24
|
9 |
Tsai, C. (2001). A review and discussion of epistemological commitments, metacognition, and critical thinking with suggestions on their enhancement in internet-assisted chemistry classrooms. Journal of Chemical Education, 78(7), 970-974
DOI
ScienceOn
|
10 |
Vhurumuku, E., Holtman, L., Mikalsen, O., and Kolsto, S.D. (2006). An investigation of Zimbabwe high school chemistry students' laboratory work-based images of the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(2), 127-149
DOI
ScienceOn
|
11 |
Bianchini, J., and Colburn, A. (2000). Teaching the nature of science through inquiry to prospective elementary teachers: A tale of two researchers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(2), 177-209
DOI
ScienceOn
|
12 |
Donnelly, J. (2001). Contested terrain or unified project? 'The nature of science' in the National Curriculum for England and Wales. International Journal of Science Education, 23(2), 181-195
DOI
ScienceOn
|
13 |
Chalmers, A.F. (1986). What is this thing called science? Milton Keynes: Open University Press
|
14 |
Chinn, C. A., and Malhotra, B. A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating in inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86, 175 - 218
DOI
ScienceOn
|
15 |
Hand, B., Prain, V., Lawrence, C. and Yore, L. D. (1999). A writing in science framework designed to improve science literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 10, 1021-1036
|
16 |
Park, Jongwon (2003a). An analysis of the processes of conceptual change through the successive refinement and articulation of student's conceptual framework - focused on the theoretical discussions - Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 23(2), 357-377
|
17 |
Sandoval, W.A. (2005). Understanding students' practical epistemologies and their influence on learning through inquiry. Science Education, 89, 634-656
DOI
ScienceOn
|
18 |
Cleminson, A. (1990). Establishing an epistemological base for science teaching in light of contemporary notions of the nature of science and of how children learn science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 429-445
DOI
|
19 |
McComas, W. F., and Olson, J. K. (1998). The nature of science in international science education standards documents. In W.F. McComas (Ed.), The Nature of Science in Science Education: Rationales and Strategies (pp. 41-52). Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers
|
20 |
Province of British of Columbia [PBC] (1996). Physics 11 and 12. Province of British of Columbia, Ministry of Education, Canada
|
21 |
Sandoval, W.A., and Reiser, B.J. (2004). Explanation- Driven inquiry: integrating conceptual and epistemic scaffolds for scientific inquiry. Science Education, 88, 345-372
DOI
ScienceOn
|
22 |
Martin, M. (1972) Concepts of Education: a Philosophical Analysis (London: Scott, Foresman and Company)
|
23 |
Abd-EI-Khalick, F. and Lederman, N. G. (2000). Improving science teachers' conceptions of nature of science: a critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 665-701
DOI
ScienceOn
|
24 |
Park, Jongwon, and Han, Sooja. (2002). Deductive reasoning to promote the change of concept about force and motion. International Journal of Science Education. 24(6), 593-610
DOI
ScienceOn
|
25 |
Brickhouse, N.W. (1990). Teachers' beliefs about the nature of science ands their relationship to classroom practice. Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 53-62
DOI
|
26 |
Lederman, N.G., and Abd-EI-Khalick, F. (1998). Avoiding de-natured science: Activities that promote understandings of the nature of science. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in history of science in science education: Rationales and strategies. (pp. 83-126). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers
|
27 |
Matthews, M. R. (1994). Science Teaching: The Role of History and Philosophy of Science. New York: Routledge
|
28 |
Popper, K. R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchnson
|
29 |
Schauble, L., Glaser, R., Duschl, R.A., Schulz, S., and John, J. (1995). Students' understanding of the objectives and procedures of experimentation in the science classroom. The Journal of the Learning Science, 4(2), 131-166
DOI
ScienceOn
|
30 |
Hempel, C.G. (1965). Aspects of Scientific Explanation. New York: The Free Press
|
31 |
Park, Jongwon (2003b). An analysis of the processes of conceptual change through the successive refmement and articulation of student's conceptual framework - focused on university students' responses - Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 23(3), 276-285
|
32 |
Rudolph, J.L. (2000). Reconsidering the 'nature of science' as a curriculum component. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32(3), 403-419
DOI
ScienceOn
|
33 |
Bell., R., and Lederman, N.G. (2003). Understandings of the nature of science and decision making on science and technology based issues. Science Education, 87, 352-377
DOI
ScienceOn
|
34 |
Bartholomew, H., Osborne, J., and Ratcliffe, M. (2004). Teaching pupils 'ideas-about-science': Five dimensions of effective practice. Science Education, 88, 655-682
DOI
ScienceOn
|
35 |
Jin, Jeong-Mee. (2005). Analysis and Survey of the Teacher's Recognition of the Inquiry unit in High school Science textbook. (Master thesis, Korea National University of Education, 2005)
|
36 |
Alters, B. J. (1997). Whose nature of science? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 39-55
DOI
ScienceOn
|
37 |
Bell, P., and Linn, M.C. (2002). Beliefs about science: how does science instruction contribute? In B.K. Hofer and P.R. Pintrich (Eds.) Personal Epistemology: The Psychology of Beliefs about Knowledge and Knowing (pp. 321-346). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers
|
38 |
Rudolph, J.L. (2005). Inquiry, instrumentalism, and the public understanding of science. Science Education, 89, 803-821
DOI
ScienceOn
|
39 |
Osborne, J., Collins, S., Ratcliffe, M., Millar, R., and Duschl, R. (2003). What 'Ideas-about-Science' should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the expert community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 692-720
DOI
ScienceOn
|
40 |
Park, Jongwon, Kim, Ikgyun, Kim, Myungwhan, and Lee, Moo. (2001). Analysis of the students' processes of confirmation and falsification of the hypotheses in electrostatics. International Journal of Science Education. 23(12), 1219-1236
DOI
ScienceOn
|
41 |
Toth, E.E., Suthers, D.D., and Lesgold, A. (2002). 'Mapping to know': The effects of representational guidance and reflective assessment on scientific inquiry. Science Education, 86, 264-286
DOI
ScienceOn
|
42 |
Lederman, N.G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, G.L., and Schwartz, R.S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners' conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 497-521
DOI
ScienceOn
|
43 |
Peirce, C. S. (1955) Abduction and induction. In J. Buchler (Ed.), Philosophical writings of Peirce (pp. 150-156). New York: Dover Publication
|
44 |
Klahr, D., and Dunbar, K. (1988). Dual space search during scientific reasoning. Cognitive Science, 12, 1-48
DOI
ScienceOn
|
45 |
National Science Teachers Association [NSTA]. (2000). NSTA position statement: The nature of science. Document retrieved: 3/18/03. from http:// www.nsta.org/159&psid=22
|
46 |
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) (1994). Project 2061: Science for All Americans. New York: Oxford University Press
|
47 |
Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolution. 2nd ed. Chicago: Chicago University Press
|
48 |
Akerson, V.L., Morrison, J.A., and McDuffie, A.R. (2006). One course is not enough: Preservice elementary teachers' retention of improved views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(2), 194-213
DOI
ScienceOn
|
49 |
Kolsto, S.D. (2001). Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues. Science Education, 85, 291-310
DOI
ScienceOn
|
50 |
Lederman, N. G. (1999). Teachers' understanding of the nature of science and classroom practice: factors that facilitate or impede the relationship. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 916-929
DOI
ScienceOn
|
51 |
National Research Council [NRC]. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academic Press
|
52 |
Lakatos, I. (1994). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In J. Worrall and G. Currie, (eds), The methodology of scientific research programmes: Philosophical papers Vol.J (pp. 8-101), New York: Cambridge University Press
|
53 |
Bell, P., and Linn, M.C. (2000). Scientific arguments as learning artifacts: designing for learning from the web with KIE. International Journal of Science Education, 22(8), 797-817
DOI
ScienceOn
|
54 |
Matthews, M. R. (1998). In defense of modest goals when teaching about the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 167 -174
|
55 |
Windschitl, M., and Andre, T. (1998). Using computer simulations to enhance conceptual change: The roles of constructivist instruction and student epistemological belief. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(2), 145-160
DOI
ScienceOn
|
56 |
Driver, D., Leach, J., Millar, R., and Scott, P. (1996). Young people's images of science. Buckingham Open University Press
|