Browse > Article

High School Science Teachers' and Students' Conceptions Related to Osmosis  

Won, Jeong-Ae (Daejeon Mebong Elementary School)
Ko, Young-Hwan (Suhmoon Girls' Middle School)
Paik, Seoung-Hey (Korea National University of Education)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education / v.27, no.2, 2007 , pp. 144-152 More about this Journal
Abstract
In this study, high school science teachers' and students' various conceptions related to osmosis phenomena were compared with and analyzed in relation to the content of science textbooks used in high school science classrooms and college science courses. The questionnaires developed by the researchers were administered to science teachers and students. Differences can be found between the explanations of science textbooks on osmotic pressure and semi-permeable membranes. Many science teachers and students thought of osmotic pressure as 'membrane pressure occurred by the movement of a solvent'. Moreover, the types of teachers of semi-permeable membranes were similar regardless of their academic majors. Many of the teachers thought of a semi-permeable membrane as a membrane that 'passes small-size particles'; however, many students thought of this type of membrane as being 'selectively permeable'. Also, the salt-pickling cabbage phenomenon seemed to cause significant confusion to science teachers and students. These study results show that teachers and students possess various conceptions related to the osmosis phenomena. These different conceptions related to osmosis phenomena might cause confusion and diverse conceptions including misconceptions among teachers and students.
Keywords
general high school; attached high school; science high school; osmotic pressure; semi-permeable membranes; osmosis phenomena; biology textbook; chemistry textbook;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Friedler, Y., Amir, R., & Tamir, P. (1987). High school students' difficulties in understanding osmosis. Science Education, 9(5), 541-551   DOI
2 Jo, J. I. & Lee, H. U. (1994); The effectiveness of learning cycle approach based on the model of molecular movement of diffusion and osmosis. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 14(3), 293-303
3 Ko, Y. H., Kang, D. H., Ryu, O. H., & Paik, S. H. (2002). Analysis of types on osmosis pressure and semipermeable membrane concept in chemistry and biology textbooks. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 22(3), 444-454
4 Mcknight, E. J., & Hackling, M. W. (1994). Students misconceptions of diffusion and osmosis. Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference of the Western Australian Science Education Association, Perth, November
5 Odom, A. L., & Barrow, L. H. (1995). Development and application of a two-tier diagnostic test measuring college biology students' understanding of diffusion and osmosis after a course of instruction, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(1), 45-61   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Park, K. H. (1998). A Study on the high school students' conceptions and misconceptions of diffusion. A thesis of master degree in Korean National University of Education. Chungbuk: Korean National University of Education Press
7 Sin, S. O. (1993). A study on the school students' conceptions and misconceptions of diffusion and osmosis. A thesis of master degree in Jeonnam National University. Gwangju: Jeonnam National University Press
8 Christianson, R. G., & Fisher, K. M. (1999). Comparison of student leaming about diffusion and osmosis in constructivist and traditional classrooms. Science Education, 21(6), 687-698   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Johnstone, A. H., & Mahmoud, N. A. (1980b). Pupils' problems with water potential. Journal of Biological Education, 14(4), 325-328   DOI
10 Murray, D. L. (1983). Misconceptions of osmosis. In H. Helm and J. D. Novak (Eds.), Proceedings of the international Seminar: Misconceptions in Science and Mathematics (pp. 428-433). New York: Cornell University Press
11 Friedler, Y., Amir, R., & Tamir, P. (1985). Identifying students' difficulties in understanding concepts pertaining to cell water relation: An exploratory study. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (58th, French Lick Spring, IN, April), 15-18
12 Jeong, K. S. (1999). An investigation on the secondary biology textbooks' misconception in the definition of vessel-sieve tube-diffusion-osmosis and transpiration evaporation. A thesis of master degree in Gyeongsang National University. Chinju: Gyeongsang National University Press
13 Soyibo, K. (1983). Selected science misconceptions amongst some Nigerian school students. In H. Helm and J. D. Novak (Eds.), Proceedings of the international Seminar: Misconceptions in Science and Mathematics (pp. 443-445). New York: Cornell University Press
14 Johnstone, A. H., & Mahmoud, N. A. (1980a). Isolating topics of high-perceived difficulty in school biology. Journal of Biological Education, 14(2), 163-166   DOI
15 Noggle, J. H. (1996). Physical chemistry (3rd ed). New York: Harper Collins College Publishers