Browse > Article

Students' Characteristics of the Reflective Inquiry Dispositions According to the Modes of Interaction of Small Group in High School Earth Science Inquiry Class  

Park, Mi-Ra (Korea National University of Education)
Jeong, Jin-Woo (Korea National University of Education)
Cheong, Cheol (Daegu University)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education / v.26, no.7, 2006 , pp. 843-855 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to understand the substance of the reflective inquiry of students and obtain educational suggestion to the inquiry class for the promotion of the reflective inquiry, by checking out which characteristics the reflective inquiry showed according to the modes of interaction of small group in highschool earth science inquiry class. The result of study is shown as follows. At the stage of developmentand conclusion, the reflective inquiry relating the task context to data context was often appeared on the group of the modes of comfort interaction, but it was very rare on the group of modes of confrontation interaction. And the reflective inquiry scale value of the latter was two times lower than the former, The comfort group showed much more reflective inquiry statements quantitatively and performed much more meaningful reflective inquiry relating the task context to the data context. The heterogeneous group in the inquiry ability and the cognitive style showed confrontation interaction modes in the affective domain, having the most negative influence on the reflective inquiry. The homogeneous group both in the cognitive style and the inquiry ability showed the comfort interaction mode, having positive int1uence on the reflective inquiry.
Keywords
reflective inquiry; interaction of small group; modes of interaction; comfort interaction; confrontation interaction;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 강석진(2000). 토론과정에서 사회적 합의 형성을 강조한 개념학습전략: 교수효과 및 소집단 토론에서의 언어적 상호작용. 서울대학교 박사학위 논문
2 Loh, B., Radinsky, J., Russell, E., Gomez, L. M., Reiser, B. J., & Edelson, D. C. (1998). The Progress Portfolio: Designing reflective tools for a classroom context. Proceedings of CHI 98, Los Angeles, CA, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
3 Lonning, R. A.(1993). Effect of cooperative learning strategies on student verbal interactions and achievement during conceptual change instruction in 10th grade general science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(9), 1087-1101   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Mundt, J., Bramlette, J., Finn, L. E., Olson, J., Aores, S., North-Tomcyzk, K., Lachance-Whitcomb, J., Loh, B., & Radinsky, Hin press). Earth structures and processes: exploring earth's crust with models & data. A middle school thematic science curriculum from the Center for Learning Technologies in Urban Schools
5 이현영, 장상실, 성숙경, 이상권, 강성주, 최병순(2002). 사회적 상호작용을 강조한 과학 탐구실험 과정에서 학생-학생 상호작용 양상 분석. 한국과학교육학회지, 22(3), 660-670
6 Turner, T., & DiMarco, W.(1998). Learning to teach science in the secondary school. New York: Routledge
7 Loh, B., Radinsky, J., Reiser, B. J., Gomez, L. M., Edelson, D. & Russell, E. (1997). The Progress Portfolio: Promoting reflective inquiry in complex investigation environments. Proceedings of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning'97, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
8 Loh, B.(2003). Using articulation and inscription as catalysts for reflection: Design principles for reflective inquiry. Doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University
9 NRC(National Research Council) (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press
10 Radinsky, J.(2000). Making sense of complex data: A framework for studying students' development of reflective inquiry dispositions. Doctoral Dissertation, Northwestern University
11 중앙적성연구소(1987). 표준화 성격진단점사
12 Witkin, H. A., Moore, C. A., Goodenough, D. R., & Cox, P. W.(1977). Field dependent and field independent cognitive styles and their educational implication. Review of Educational Research, 47, 1-64   DOI   ScienceOn
13 이현영 (2002) 사회적 상호작용을 강조한 과학 탐구 실험 과정에서 학생- 학생 상호작용 양상 분석 한국교원대학교 석사학위논문
14 Kim, K., Grabowski, B. L., & Sharma, P.(2004). Designing a classroom as a learner-centered learning environment prompting students' reflective thinking in K-12. (ED 485059)
15 강석진, 한수진, 노태희 (2002). 과학개념 학습에서 협동적 소집단 토론의 효과. 한국과학교육학회지, 22(1), 93-101
16 전윤식, 장혁표(1983). 집단잠입도형검사 태화 출판사
17 Bianchini, J. A. (1997). Where knowledge construction, equity, and context intersect: Student learning of science in small groups. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(10), 1039-1065   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Loh, B., Reiser, B. J., Radinsky, J., Edelson, D. C, Gomez, L. M, & Marshal, S. (2001). Developing reflective inquiry practices: A case study of software, the teacher, and students. In S. K. Crowley & C. Schunn & T. Okada (Eds), Designing for science: implications from everyday, classroom, and professional settings. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
19 Burns, J., Okey, J., & Wise, K. (1985). Development of an Integrated Process Skills Test: TIPS II. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22(2), 169-177   DOI
20 Radinsky, J., Leimberer, J. M., & Gomez, L. M. (2000). Reflective inquiry with complex data: A case study of dispositional learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA, April 24-28
21 Mahanz, M.(1997). The content and nature of reflective teaching: A case of an expert middle school science teacher. Gearing House, 70(3), 143-150   DOI
22 성숙경(2005) 사회적 상호작용을 강조한 과학탐구 실험에서 언어적 상호작용의 변화와 특성. 한국교원대학교 박사학위논문