1 |
Kim, C.-J. (2002). Inference frequently used in earth science. Journal of the Korean Earth Sciecne Society, 23(2), 188-193
|
2 |
Mannoia, V. J. (1980). What is science? An introduction to the structure and methodology of science. Lanham, MD: University of Press of America
|
3 |
Solomon, M. (1992). Scientific rationality and human reasoning. Philosophy of Science, 59, 439-455
ScienceOn
|
4 |
김찬종 (1998). 초등 과학 우수 학생의 일상적 맥락의 과학 문제 해결 과정: 서답형 문항에 대한 응답 분석. 한국초등과학교육학회지, 17(1), 75-87
|
5 |
Baker, V. R. (2(H)). Conversing with the Earth: The geological approach to understanding. In R. Frodeman (Ed.), Earth matters: The earth sciences, philosophy, and the claims of community, (pp. 2-10). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall
|
6 |
Elgelhardt, W. von., & Zimmermann, J. (1982). Theory of earth science (translated by L. Fischer). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
|
7 |
Baker, V. R. (1996). Hypothese and geomorphological reasoning. In B. L. Rhoads & C. E. Thorn (Eds.), The scientific nature of geomorphology, (pp. 57-85). New York, NY: John Wiely & Sons
|
8 |
Johnson, T. R, & Krems, J. F. (2001). Use of current explanations in multicausal abductive reasoning. Cognitive Science, 25, 903-939
ScienceOn
|
9 |
Magnani, L. (2001). Abduction, reason, and science: Process of discovery and explanation. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers
|
10 |
Thagard, P. (1988). Computational philosophy of science. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press
|
11 |
Shelley, C. (1996). Visual abductive reasoning in archaeology. Philosophy of Science, 63, 278-301
ScienceOn
|
12 |
National Research Council (19%). National Science Education Standards. Washington, EC: National Academy Press
|
13 |
Thagard, P. (1992). Conceptual revolutions. Princeton, N.I: Princeton University Press
|
14 |
Eco, U. (1983). Horns, hooves, insteps: Some hypotheses on three types of abduction. In U. Eco & T. A. Sebeok (Ed.), The sign of three: Dupin, Holmes, Peirce, (pp. 198-220). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press
|
15 |
Leak, D. B. (1995). Abduction, experience, and goals: A model of everyday abductive explanation. The Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 7, 407-428
ScienceOn
|
16 |
Schumm, S. A. (1991). To interpret the Earth: Ten ways to be wrong. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
|
17 |
오필석, 김찬종 (2005). 지구과학의 한 탐구 방법으로서 귀추법에 대한 이론적 고찰. 한국과학교육학회지, 25(6), 610-623
|
18 |
오필석 (2005). 지구과학적으로 탐구하기: 지구과학 수업에서의 귀추적 탐구. 함께하는 지구과학교육, 4(1), 52-60
|
19 |
권용주, 심해숙, 정진수, 박국태 (2003). 수증기 응결에 관한 초등학생들의 가설 생성에서 귀추의 역할과 과정. 한국지구과학회지, 24(4), 250-257
|
20 |
Giere, R. N. (1999). Science without laws. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press
|
21 |
박종원 (2001). 학생의 과학적 설명 가설의 생성 과정 분석: 대학생의 반응 분석을 중심으로. 한국과학교육학회지, 21(3), 209-621
|
22 |
Rhoads, B. L, & Thorn, C. E. (1996). Observation in geomorphology. In B. L. Rhoads & C. E. Thorn (Eds.), The scientific nature of geomorphology, (pp. 21-56). New York, NY: John Wiely & Sons
|
23 |
Gilbert, G. K. (1896). The origin of hypotheses: Illustrated by the discussion of a topographical problem. Science, New Series, 3(53), 1-13
|
24 |
Schurz, G. (2002). Model of abduction: From an interrogative viewpoint. In G. Schurz & M. Werning. (Eds.), Philosophical prepublication series of the chair of theoretical philosophy at the University of Duseldorf. Available from http://thphil.phil-fak.uni-duesseldorf.de/index.php/filemanager/download/68/ModelsAbducReasoning.pdf
|
25 |
Kim, C.-J. (2003). Preparing teachers for systems science methodology. In V. J. Mayer (Ed.), Implementing global science literacy, (pp. 255-266). Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University
|
26 |
Kim, J., & Cunningham, D. J. (2003). A syllogism for formulating hypotheses. Semiotica, 144, 303-317
|
27 |
Duschl, R. A., & Smith, M. J. (2001). Earth science. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Subject-specific instructional methods and activities, (pp. 269-290). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science
|
28 |
Dodick, J., & Orion, N. (2003). Geology as an historical science: Its perception within science and the educational system. Science & Education, 12, 197-211
|
29 |
Gilbert, S. W., & Ireton, S. W. (2003). Understanding models in earth and space science. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press
|
30 |
The Watercourse and Council for Environmental Education (1995). Project WET: Curriculum & Activity Guide. Bozeman, MT: Author
|
31 |
Harre, R. (1972). The philosophies of science. (민찬홍, 이병욱 (역) (1985). 과학철학. 서울: 서광사). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press
|
32 |
Harrowitz, N. (1983). The body of the detective model: Charles S. Peirce and Edgar Allan Poe. In U. Eco & T. A. Sebeok (Ed.), The sign of three: Dupin, Holmes, Peirce, (pp. 179-197). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press
|
33 |
Kruijff, G.-J. M. (2005). Peirce's late theory of abduction: A comprehensive account. Semiotica, 153, 431-454
|
34 |
Bonfantini, M A., & Proni, G. (1983). To guess or not to guess? In U. Eco & T. A. Sebeok (Ed.), The sign of three: Dupin, Holmes, Peirce, (pp. 119-134). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press
|