Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2006.26.4.502

Analysis of Physics Problem Solving Processes According to Cognitive Style  

Park, Yune-Bae (Kyungpook National University)
Cho, Yoon-Kyung (Kyungpook National University)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education / v.26, no.4, 2006 , pp. 502-509 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to analyze physics problem solving processes according to students' cognitive style in the area of 'Force and Motion' at high school level. Students who have already learned t e area of 'Force and Motion' during the first semester of the 10th grade have taken physics test and cognitive style test to choose students who have basic knowledge of physics and reflective or impulsive style. Four students who got over 19 points in the cognitive style test were selected as reflective students, and another four students who got below 12 points were selected as impulsive students. After explaining the purpose and procedure of this study, think-aloud method was introduced to the students, and the students practiced it. After that, the students solved three quantitative and qualitative problems each. Then, the questionnaire on the belief system on physics and physics problem solving and prerequisite knowledge test were also administered. By recording the students' problem solving processes, protocol was made and analyzed. After solving the problems, the students expressed their confidence, intimacy, and preference on each problem by the five point Likert scale. Impulsive students tended to succeed in solving more problems, less intimate, and more spontaneous and positive in seeking alternative solution when confronted with unacquainted problems. On the other hand, reflective students used more time in executing the problems even without planning, and used more time in solving problems and verification. Whether making effective plan or not was important rather than how much time they used in the planning step. In addition, repeating steps were more likely shown to impulsive students; they tended to be attached to their first idea.
Keywords
Physics education; Problem solving; Cognitive style; Protocol analysis; Reflection-Impulsivity;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 김성덕(1990). 인지양식과 문제해결과정 및 성취도와의 관계. 한국교원대학교 석사학위 논문
2 박학규, 권재술(1994). 물리 문제해결과정에서의 학생들의 사고 과정에 관한 연구. 한국과학교육학회지, 14(1). 85-102
3 Kagan, J. (1966). Reflection-impulsivity: The generality and dynamics of conceptual tempo. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 71, 17-24
4 Kagan, S., & Kogan, N. (1970). Individuality and cognitive performance. In P. IT. Mussen(Ed), Carmichaefs manual of child psychology. NY: Wiley & Sons
5 Mann, L. (1973). Differences between reflective and impulsive children in tempo and quality of decision making. Child Development, 44(2), 274-279
6 박학규, 권재술(1990). 물리 문제해결에 관한 초심자의 프로토콜 분석 연구. 한국과학교육학회지, 10(1), 57-64
7 Kagan, J. (1965). The matching familiar figures test. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
8 박윤배, 김미영 (2006). 협동해결과 개별해결에서 나타난 물리문제해결과정의 차이. 한국과학교육학회지, 26(1), 114-121
9 Guilford, J. P. (1980). Cognitive styles: What are they? Educational Psychology and Measurement, 40(3), 715-735
10 박윤배(1988). Expert-novice differences of mental representation and problem dolving strtegy in mechanics peoblem. 한국과학교육학회지, 8(2), 43-52
11 박학규(1993). 학생들의 물리 문제해결과정과 문제 공간의 유형 분석. 한국교원대학교 대학원 박사학위논문
12 Mollick, L. R, & Messer, S. B. (1978). The relation of reflection-impulsivity to intelligence tests. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 132(1), 157-158   ScienceOn
13 Larkin, J. H., McDermott, J., Simon, D. P., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Models of competence in solving physics problems. Cognitive Science, 4, 317-345   ScienceOn
14 박윤배, 조윤경(2005). 정성적, 정량적 문제에 대한 고등학생들의 물리 문제해결과정 분석. 한국과학교육학회지, 25(4), 526-532
15 Goldstein, K. M, & Blackman, S. (1976). Cognitive complexity, maternal child rearing and acquiescence. Social Behavior and Personality, 4(1), 97-102
16 박영수(1989). 인지양식(충동성)과 자료제시유형이 학업성취에 미치는 효과 연구. 전북대학교 대학원 석사학위 논문
17 홍미영(1995). 문제와 문제해결자의 특성이 화학 문제해결에 미치는 영향. 서울대학교 대학원 과학교육과 박사학위논문
18 박윤배(1991). 역학문제해결에 있어서의 오류 유형. 물리교육, 9(1), 14-23
19 김상동(1998). 학생들의 인지양식에 따른 역학에 관한 정성적 문항과 정량적 문항의 난이도 비교. 한국교원대학교 대학원 석사학위논문
20 정범모, 이종승(1994). 인성진단검사 실시요강. 서울: 코리안 테스팅 센터
21 박학규, 이용현(1993). 물리 문제해결과정에서 중학생들의 사고 과정의 특성 분석. 한국과학교육학회지, 13(1), 31-47