Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2006.26.2.177

Aims of Laboratory Activities in School Science: A Delphi Study of Expert Community  

Yang, Il-Ho (Korea National University of Education)
Cho, Hyun-Jun (Korea National University of Education)
Jeong, Jin-Woo (Korea National University of Education)
Hur, Myung (Ewha Womans University)
Kim, Young-Shin (Kyungpook National University)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education / v.26, no.2, 2006 , pp. 177-190 More about this Journal
Abstract
Numerous aims of laboratory activities have been suggested by a number of researchers in science education; however the lists of aims very according to researcher. As such, there is still no agreement educational goals on the in science laboratory activities by experts in science education. The purpose of this study was to obtain a consensus using the Delphi technique on the aims of laboratory activities from expert community. This expert community consisted of four scientists, four science educators, six elementary school teachers, and seven secondary school teachers. The list of aims obtained from the expert community were tested with the Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test to determine whether IQR between 2nd and 3rd was convergent. Results of this study produced, lists of aims of laboratory activities according to school science level. There were seven aims for elementary school science, nine aims for secondary school science, and thirteen aims for university science.
Keywords
aims of laboratory activities; Delphi technique; expert community;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 김주훈, 이미경 (2003). 과학과 교육목표 및 내용체계 연구(I). 한국교육과정 평가원, 연구보고 RRC 2003-4, 28-43
2 노태희, 최용남 (1996) 초.중.고 학생들의 과학 수업환경 인식 및 태도와의 관계성 조사. 한국과학교육학회지, 16(2), 217-225
3 송진웅, 박승재, 장경애 (1992). 초중고 남녀 학생의 과학수업과 과학자에 대한 태도. 한국과학교육학회지, 12(3),109-118
4 심규철, 김현섭, 박영철 (2001). 중.고등학생 및 대학생의 과학 관련 태도에 대한 비교 연구. 한국과학교육학회지, 21(3), 558-565
5 임청환 (1995). 국민학생과 중학생들의 과학에 관련된 태도연구. 한국과학교육학회지, 15(2), 194-200
6 허명 (1993) 초.중.고 학생의 과학 및 과학교과에 대한 태도 조사 연구. 한국과학교육학회지, 13(3), 334-340
7 Babikian, Y. (1971). An empirical investigation to determine the relative effectiveness of discovery, laboratory, and expository methods of teaching science concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 8(3), 201-209
8 Boud, D. J. (1980). The aims of science laboratory course: A survey of studnets, graduates and practising scientists. European Journal of Science Education, 2(4), 415-421
9 Boud, D., Dunn, J., & Hegarty-Hazel, E. (1986). Teaching in laboratories. Guilford: SRHE & NFER-Nelson
10 Bybee, R., & DeBoer, G. (1994). Research on goals for the science curriculum. Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 357-387). New York:MacMillan
11 Collins, S., Osborne, J., Ratcliffe, M., Millar, R., & Duschl, R. (2001). What 'ideas-about-science' should be taught in school science? A delphi study of the expert community. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Educational Research Association 2001, Seattle, 1-29
12 Gardner, B. J. (1975). Attitudes to science: A review. Studies in Science Education, 2, 1-41
13 Gardner, P., & Gauld, C. (1990). Labwork and students attitudes. In E. Hegarty-Hazel (Ed.), The student laboratory and the science curriculum (pp. 132-156). London: Routledge
14 Garnett, P. J., & O' Loughlin, M. O. (1989). Using practical tests to assess laboratory work in chemistry. Australian Science Teachers Journal. 35(4), 27-37
15 Germann, P. J., Aram, R., & Burke, G (1996a). Identifying patterns and relationships among the responses of seventh-grade students to the science process skill of designing experiments. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 79-99
16 Hart, C, Mulhall, P., Berry, A., Loughran, J., & Gunstone, R. (2000). What is the purpose of this experiment? Or can students learn something from doing experiments? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(7), 655-675   ScienceOn
17 Hellingman, C. (1982). A trial list of objectives of experimental work in science education. European Journal of Science Mathematics Education, 4(1), 29-43   ScienceOn
18 Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88(1), 28-54   ScienceOn
19 Karnpourakis, C., & Tsaparlis, G. (2003). A study of the effect of a practical activity on problem solving in chemistry. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice, 4(3). 319-333
20 Lunetta, V. N. (1998). The School Science Laboratory: Historical perspectives and context for contemporary teaching. In B. Fraser & K. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education, part 1 (pp. 249-262). Kluwer Academic Publishers
21 Padilla, M. J., Okey, J. R., & Dillashaw, F. G. (1981). The relationship between science process skill and formal thinking abilities. A Paper Presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching Annual Meeting (54th, Grossinger's in the Catskills, Ellenville, NY, April 5-8). ED 201 488
22 Robertson, M., Line, M., Jones, S., & Thomas, S. (2000). International students, learning environments and perceptions: A case study using the Delphi technique. Higher Education Research & Development, 19(1), 89- 102   ScienceOn
23 Roth, W. M. (1994). Experimenting in a constructivist high school physics laboratory. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 197-223   ScienceOn
24 Schibeci, R. A. (1983). Selecting appropriate attitudinal objectives for school science. Science Education, 67(5), 595-603
25 Watson, R. (2000). The role of practical work. In M. Monk & J. Osborne (Eds.), Good practice in science teaching: What research has to say, (pp. 57-71). Buckingham: Open University Press
26 Wellington, J. J. (2000). Teaching and learning secondary science - contemporary issues and practical approaches (pp. 145-155). London and New York; Routledge
27 권치순, 허명, 양일호, 김영선 (2004). 초.중고 학생들의 과학 태도 변화에 대한 학습환경의 원인 분석. 한국과학교육학회지, 24(6), 1256-1271
28 Germann, P. J., & Aram, R. (1996). Students performance on the science process skills of recording data, analysing data, drawing conclusions and providing evidence. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 13, 773-798
29 Kerr, J. (1963). A Classic enquiry into the nature and purpose of school science practical work, based on a study of 701 teachers in 151 schools. Practical work in school science, Leicester: Leicester University Press
30 Nott, M., & Wellington, J. J. (1996). When the black box springs open: practical work in schools and the nature of science, International Journal of Science Education, 18, 807-824   ScienceOn
31 Oliver, J. S., & Simpson, R. D. (1988). Influences of attitude toward science, achievement motivation, and science self concept on achievement in science: A longitudinal study. Science Education, 72(2), 143-155
32 Wellington, J. J. (1998). Practical work in school: time for a re-appraisal. In J. J. Wellington (Ed.), Practical work in School Science (pp. 3-15). NY: Routledge
33 AAAS (American Association for the Advancement of science). (1993). Benchmarks for Science Literacy (pp.281-300). New York: Oxford University Press
34 이미경, 김경희 (2004). 과학에 대한 태도와 과학성취도의 관계, 한국과학교육학회지, 24(2), 399-407
35 Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (1982). The role of laboratory in science teaching: Neglected aspects of research. Review of Educational Research, 52(2), 201-217   ScienceOn
36 Molitor, L., & George, K. (1976). Development of a test of science precess skills. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 13, 405-412
37 Hegarty-Hazel, E. (Ed.). (1990). The student laboratory and the science curriculum. Routledge: London
38 Osborne, J., Collins, S., Ratcliffe, M., Millar, R., & Duschl, R. (2003). What 'ideas-about-science' should be taught in school science? A delphi study of the expert community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(7), 692-720   ScienceOn
39 이지현, 남정희, 문성배 (2003). 실험실습법에 의한 수행평가가 중학생의 과학성취도 및 정의적 영역에 미치는 영향. 한국과학교육학회지, 23(1), 66-74
40 Nott, M. (1997). Keeping scientists in their place. School Science Review, 78(285), 49-60
41 Clough, M. P., & Clark, R. (1994). Cookbooks and constructivism- a better approach to laboratory activities. The Science Teacher, 61(2), 34-37
42 Staer, H., Goodrum, D., & Hackling, M. (1998). High school laboratory work in western australia: Openness to inquiry. Research in Science Education, 28(2), 219-228   ScienceOn
43 Trumper, R. (2003). The physics laboratory-a historical overview and future perspectives. Science & Education, 12(4), 645-670
44 Bartholomew, H., Osborn, J., & Ratcliffe, M. (2004). Teaching students 'ideas-about-science': Five dimensions of effective practice. Science Education, 88(5), 655-682   ScienceOn
45 Bredderman, T. (1983 ). Effects of activity-based elementary science on student outcomes: A quantitative synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 53, 499-518   ScienceOn
46 Cyphert, F. R., & Gant, W. L. (1970). The Delphi technique: A tool for collecting opinions in teacher education. In Exploring the potential of the Delphi technique by analyzing its application. Syrnposium conducted by AERA in Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
47 McComas, W. F. (1997). Research on Curriculum, teaching, and learning- TIle laboratory environment: An ecological perspective. Science Education International, 8(2), 12-16
48 Lazarowitz, R., & Tamir, R. (1994). Research on using laboratory instruction in science. In D. Gabel (Ed), Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning (pp. 94-128). New York: MacMillan
49 Chang, C.-Y., & Weng, Y.-H. (2002). An exploratory study on students' problem-solving ability in earth science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(5), 441-451   ScienceOn
50 Johnstone, A. H., & Al-Shuaili, A. (2001). Learning in the laboratory: Some thoughts from the literature. University chemistry education, 5(2), 42-51
51 Tobin, K. (1990). Research on science laboratory activities: In pursuit of better questions and answers to improve learning. School Science and Mathematics, 90(5), 403-418
52 김영신, 양일호 (2005). 초등학교 학생들의 과학 태도 변화에 영향을 미치는 요인 분석. 초등과학교육, 24(3), 292-300
53 Gess-Newsome, J. (2002). The use and impact of explicit instruction about the nature of science and science inquiry in an elementary science methods course. Science & Education, 11, 55-67
54 Kenyon, L., & Reiser, B. (2005). Students' epistemologies of science and their influence on inquiry practices. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, April 4-7, 2005. Dallas, TX
55 윤덕근, 김성사, 차희영, 이길재, 정완호 (2004). 과학고 학생들의 창의력과 과학적 사고력 향상을 위한 생물 실험 모듈의 적용효과. 한국과학교육학회지, 24(3), 556-564
56 Foster, D., & Lock, R. (1987). Teaching science (pp. 11-13). London: Croom Helm
57 Beaumont-Walters, Y., & Soyibo, K. (2001). An analysis of high school students' performance on five integrated science process skills. Research in Science and Technological Education, 19(2), 133-145   ScienceOn
58 Gupta, V. (2001). Aims of laboratory teaching. Centre for Development of Teaching and Learning, 4(1), 1-3
59 Rowe, G., & Wright, G. (2001). Expert opinions in forecasting: The role of the Delphi technique. International Series In Operations Research and Management Science, -(30), 125-144
60 교육부 (1992). 고등학교 과학과 교육과정해설-공통과학, 물리, 화학, 생물, 지구과학. 교육부 고시 제 1992-19호, 서울: 대한교과서 주식회사
61 이종성 (2001). 델파이 방법. 서울: 교육과학사
62 Hodson, D. (1996). Practical work in school science: Exploring some directions for change. International Journal of Science Education, 18(7), 755-760   ScienceOn
63 White, R. T. (1996). The link between the laboratory and teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 18(7). 761-774   ScienceOn
64 김효남, 정완호, 정진우, 양일호, 김영신 (1999). 초.중고 학생들의 과학 정의적 특성 추이 분석을 위한 단적 연구. 한국과학교육학회지, 19(2), 194-203
65 AAAS (American Association for the Advancement of Science). (1989). Science for all americans: a project 2061 report on literacy coaIs in science, mathematics, and technology (pp. 11-15). Washigton, D. C.: AAAS Publication
66 Boud, D. J. (1973). The laboratory aims questionnairea new method for course improbement? Higher Education, 2. 81-94
67 권용주, Lawson, A. E. (1999). Why do most science educators encourage to teach school science through lab-based instruction?: a neurological explanation. 한국과학교육학회지, 19(1), 29-40
68 Nott, M., & Smith, R. (1995). 'Talking your way out of it', 'rigging', and 'conjuring': What science teachers do when practieals go wrong. International Journal of Science Education, 17, 399-410   ScienceOn
69 조연순, 성진숙, 채제숙, 구성혜 (2000). 창의적 문제해결력 신장을 위한 초등과학교육과정 개발 및 적용. 한국과학교육학회지, 20(2), 307-328
70 Hofstein, A. (2004), The laboratory in chemistry education: Thirty years of experience with developments, implementation, and research. Chemistry Education, 5(3), 247-264
71 Bekalo, S., & Welford, G. (2000) . Practical activity in Ethiopian secondary physical sciences: Implications for policy and practice of the match between the intended and implemented curriculum. Research Papers in Education, 15(2), 185-212   ScienceOn
72 임청환, 남진수 (1999). 초등학생의 정신용량과 인지양식에 따른 과학탐구능력. 한국과학교육학회지, 19(3), 441-447
73 장소영, 노석구 (2005). 초등학생의 과학선호도에 영향을 주는 과학수업에 대한 인식 조사. 초등과학교육, 24(4), 435-442
74 Nakayama, G. (1988). A study of the relationship between cognitive styles and integrated science process skills. ERIC No. ED 291 592
75 Reynolds, A J., & Walberg, H. J. (1991). A structural model of science achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(1), 97-107
76 Amanda, B., Pam, M., Richard, G., & John, L. (1999). Helping students learn from laboratory work. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 45(1), 27-31
77 Hodson, D. (1998). Is this really what scientists do? Seeking a more authentic science in and beyond the school laboratory. In J. J. Wellington (Ed.), Practical work in School Science (pp. 93-108). NY: Routledge
78 Swain, J. R. L. (1974). Practical objectives- a review. Education in Chemistry, 11(4), 152-156
79 홍미영, 정은영, 맹희주 (2002). 초등학교 과학과 교수.학습 방법과 자료 개발 연구. 한국교육과정평가원, 연구보고 RRC 2002-18, 18-20
80 홍형득 (2002). 지식정보화사회와 차기정부의 과제. 한국행정학회 2002 추계학술대회 발표논문집, 351-368
81 Germann, P. J., Haskins, S., & Auls, S. (1996b). Analysis of nine high school biology laboratory manuals:Promoting scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 475-499
82 Hodson, D. (1988). Experiments in science and science teaching. Educational Philosophy Theory, 20(2), 253-266
83 Whitman. N. I. (1990). The committee meeting alternative: Using the Delphi Technique. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 20(7-8), 30-36
84 Tasker, R. (1981). Children's views and classroom experiences. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 27, 33-39
85 교육부 (1997). 초.중등학교 교육과정-국민공통 기본 교육과정. 교육부 고시 제 1997-15호[별책 1], 서울: 대한교과서 주식회사
86 서창교, 김은진, 이영숙 (2001). 웹에 기반한 델파이 의사결정지원시스템의 구현. 정보시스템연구, 10(1), 5-25
87 양일호, 조현준 (2005). 학교 과학수업에서 실험의 목적에 대한 고찰. 초등과학교육, 24(3) , 268-280
88 Garnett, P. J., Garnett P. J., & Hackling, M. W. (1995). Refocusing the chemistry lab: A case for laboratory-based investigations. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 41(2), 26-32